Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Patients with Anxiety in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Chuntana Reangsing, Sasinun Punsuwun, Sathit Wongsuraprakit
{"title":"Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Patients with Anxiety in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chuntana Reangsing, Sasinun Punsuwun, Sathit Wongsuraprakit","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> We synthesized the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on anxiety symptoms in adults with cancer. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We searched 11 electronic databases from inception to February 2024. We included studies comparing MBIs with usual care, waitlist controls, or no intervention for the improvement of patients with anxiety in cancer (CA). We only reviewed studies written in English. We used a random-effects model to compute the effect size. Funnel plot, <i>Q</i> statistics, and <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> were used to test the heterogeneity across studies. We examined moderators to explore sources of heterogeneity. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Across 26 included studies, 1431 adults with cancer participated in MBIs; 1289 served as controls. Mean age ranged from 42.8 to 70.7 years. Most patients were females (56%), and patients with breast cancer and mixed cancer (55.53% and 26.20%, respectively). Overall, MBIs reduced anxiety in the experimental groups compared to control groups (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.977, 95% confidence interval = 0.61, 1.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%), but with substantial heterogeneity. In subgroup analysis, funding, setting, <i>a priori</i> power analysis, providing MBIs in adults with cancer and anxiety disorders, and measuring anxiety after postintervention were moderators affecting the pooled effect size. No other quality indicators moderated the effect sizes of MBIs on anxiety. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> MBIs appear efficacious in improving patients with CA, especially for those with mild-to-moderate anxiety symptoms. Clinicians and health providers might consider using MBIs as an alternative complementary treatment for improving or preventing anxiety disorders in adults living with cancer. With heterogeneity of studies, a large number of primary studies is needed to explore the source of heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We synthesized the effects of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on anxiety symptoms in adults with cancer. Method: We searched 11 electronic databases from inception to February 2024. We included studies comparing MBIs with usual care, waitlist controls, or no intervention for the improvement of patients with anxiety in cancer (CA). We only reviewed studies written in English. We used a random-effects model to compute the effect size. Funnel plot, Q statistics, and I2 were used to test the heterogeneity across studies. We examined moderators to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results: Across 26 included studies, 1431 adults with cancer participated in MBIs; 1289 served as controls. Mean age ranged from 42.8 to 70.7 years. Most patients were females (56%), and patients with breast cancer and mixed cancer (55.53% and 26.20%, respectively). Overall, MBIs reduced anxiety in the experimental groups compared to control groups (Hedges' g = 0.977, 95% confidence interval = 0.61, 1.34, I2 = 95%), but with substantial heterogeneity. In subgroup analysis, funding, setting, a priori power analysis, providing MBIs in adults with cancer and anxiety disorders, and measuring anxiety after postintervention were moderators affecting the pooled effect size. No other quality indicators moderated the effect sizes of MBIs on anxiety. Conclusion: MBIs appear efficacious in improving patients with CA, especially for those with mild-to-moderate anxiety symptoms. Clinicians and health providers might consider using MBIs as an alternative complementary treatment for improving or preventing anxiety disorders in adults living with cancer. With heterogeneity of studies, a large number of primary studies is needed to explore the source of heterogeneity.

正念干预对癌症焦虑患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:我们综合了正念干预(MBIs)对成年癌症患者焦虑症状的影响。方法:检索自成立至2024年2月的11个电子数据库。我们纳入了比较mbi与常规护理、候补对照或无干预对改善癌症焦虑患者(CA)的研究。我们只复习了用英语写的研究。我们使用随机效应模型来计算效应大小。采用漏斗图、Q统计量和I2来检验各研究的异质性。我们检查了调节因子以探索异质性的来源。结果:在纳入的26项研究中,1431名成年癌症患者参与了MBIs;1289人作为对照。平均年龄42.8 ~ 70.7岁。以女性患者居多(56%),其次为乳腺癌和混合癌患者(分别为55.53%和26.20%)。总体而言,与对照组相比,MBIs减少了实验组的焦虑(Hedges' g = 0.977, 95%可信区间= 0.61,1.34,I2 = 95%),但存在很大的异质性。在亚组分析中,资金、环境、先验功率分析、为患有癌症和焦虑症的成年人提供mbi,以及干预后测量焦虑是影响综合效应大小的调节因子。没有其他质量指标调节mbi对焦虑的效应大小。结论:MBIs对CA患者有效,尤其是对有轻至中度焦虑症状的患者。临床医生和医疗服务提供者可能会考虑使用MBIs作为改善或预防成人癌症患者焦虑障碍的替代补充治疗。由于研究具有异质性,需要大量的初步研究来探索异质性的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信