Alexandra Lindsay-Perez, Rebecca Jurdon, Thomas King, Lydia Koffman, Nia Roberts, Richard J. McManus, David McCartney
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors in patients with hypertension","authors":"Alexandra Lindsay-Perez, Rebecca Jurdon, Thomas King, Lydia Koffman, Nia Roberts, Richard J. McManus, David McCartney","doi":"10.1038/s41371-025-01051-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, for which the management involves both lifestyle modification (diet, exercise etc) and medication. Digital interventions (mobile applications, websites, and SMS messages) are being developed to facilitate lifestyle change, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This review aimed to establish whether digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors are effective in reducing blood pressure in individuals with hypertension. A systematic search was run through MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. 5302 records were screened for eligibility and data on the primary outcome (systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and secondary outcomes (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and change in lifestyle factors) were extracted from eligible papers. Where sufficient data were available, meta-analysis was undertaken using a random effects model. 17 randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion (3040 patients). 12 studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Lifestyle change mediated by digital interventions were associated with a larger SBP reduction than controls (mean difference (MD) −2.91 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) −4.11, −1.71; p value (p) <0.0001). A significant difference was also seen in DBP reduction between groups (MD −1.13 mmHg; CI −1.91, −0.35; p = 0.005). Reporting of other secondary outcomes relating to lifestyle change was too heterogenous for meta-analysis. Digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors were associated with an improvement in blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but interpretation of the results is limited by significant heterogeneity between studies. Further research is required to understand which lifestyle factors, when targeted with digital interventions, result in maximal blood pressure reduction.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":"39 10","pages":"690-700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-025-01051-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-025-01051-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, for which the management involves both lifestyle modification (diet, exercise etc) and medication. Digital interventions (mobile applications, websites, and SMS messages) are being developed to facilitate lifestyle change, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This review aimed to establish whether digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors are effective in reducing blood pressure in individuals with hypertension. A systematic search was run through MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. 5302 records were screened for eligibility and data on the primary outcome (systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and secondary outcomes (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and change in lifestyle factors) were extracted from eligible papers. Where sufficient data were available, meta-analysis was undertaken using a random effects model. 17 randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion (3040 patients). 12 studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Lifestyle change mediated by digital interventions were associated with a larger SBP reduction than controls (mean difference (MD) −2.91 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI) −4.11, −1.71; p value (p) <0.0001). A significant difference was also seen in DBP reduction between groups (MD −1.13 mmHg; CI −1.91, −0.35; p = 0.005). Reporting of other secondary outcomes relating to lifestyle change was too heterogenous for meta-analysis. Digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors were associated with an improvement in blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but interpretation of the results is limited by significant heterogeneity between studies. Further research is required to understand which lifestyle factors, when targeted with digital interventions, result in maximal blood pressure reduction.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension.
The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.