Eve Frangopoulos, Ziv Savin, Ralph V Clayman, Vinay Durbhakula, William M Atallah, Aymon Ali, Jamie Landman, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"Aspiration Technologies in Flexible Ureteroscopic Urolithiasis Treatment: A Disruptive Concept in Pursuit of a Stone-Free Future.","authors":"Eve Frangopoulos, Ziv Savin, Ralph V Clayman, Vinay Durbhakula, William M Atallah, Aymon Ali, Jamie Landman, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1177/08927790251364285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic innovation has played a pivotal role in advancing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Integration of aspiration technology into flexible ureteroscopes (fURS), termed direct in-scope suction (DISS), and into ureteral access sheaths (s-UAS) are the most recent and rapidly progressing advancements. Aspiration technologies aim to augment stone-free rates (SFR) associated with traditional RIRS and may provide an alternative to retrograde management of large calculi typically managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This systematic and narrative review aims to consolidate the current evidence on aspiration devices used in RIRS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the Covidence platform, a literature search was conducted including the PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to October 2024. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613059). Studies were categorized based on level of evidence and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and large-scale prospective studies; papers were excluded due to expired technology or absence of a traditional fURS comparator group. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Literature search yielded 232 articles. Following exclusion and manual review, 11 studies (1 RCT, 8 comparative cohort studies, and 2 large-scale observational studies) were selected for analysis. Assessing level 1 evidence, immediate and final SFRs were significantly higher in s-UAS groups. S-UAS was also superior to traditional fURS in achieving superior SFR for the management of renal calculi with level 3 evidence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Early studies utilizing contemporary aspiration technologies demonstrated superior efficacy and efficiency with respect to immediate SFR and operative times in patients undergoing fURS for renal stones between 1 and 2 cm compared with traditional fURS. Future studies adhering to standardized SFR criteria with postoperative thin-slice (2 mm) noncontrast computed tomography scanning is warranted to more precisely assess the effectiveness of aspiration technology-associated SFR values.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"829-840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251364285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic innovation has played a pivotal role in advancing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Integration of aspiration technology into flexible ureteroscopes (fURS), termed direct in-scope suction (DISS), and into ureteral access sheaths (s-UAS) are the most recent and rapidly progressing advancements. Aspiration technologies aim to augment stone-free rates (SFR) associated with traditional RIRS and may provide an alternative to retrograde management of large calculi typically managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This systematic and narrative review aims to consolidate the current evidence on aspiration devices used in RIRS. Methods: Using the Covidence platform, a literature search was conducted including the PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to October 2024. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613059). Studies were categorized based on level of evidence and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and large-scale prospective studies; papers were excluded due to expired technology or absence of a traditional fURS comparator group. Results: Literature search yielded 232 articles. Following exclusion and manual review, 11 studies (1 RCT, 8 comparative cohort studies, and 2 large-scale observational studies) were selected for analysis. Assessing level 1 evidence, immediate and final SFRs were significantly higher in s-UAS groups. S-UAS was also superior to traditional fURS in achieving superior SFR for the management of renal calculi with level 3 evidence. Conclusion: Early studies utilizing contemporary aspiration technologies demonstrated superior efficacy and efficiency with respect to immediate SFR and operative times in patients undergoing fURS for renal stones between 1 and 2 cm compared with traditional fURS. Future studies adhering to standardized SFR criteria with postoperative thin-slice (2 mm) noncontrast computed tomography scanning is warranted to more precisely assess the effectiveness of aspiration technology-associated SFR values.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.