Aspiration Technologies in Flexible Ureteroscopic Urolithiasis Treatment: A Disruptive Concept in Pursuit of a Stone-Free Future.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1177/08927790251364285
Eve Frangopoulos, Ziv Savin, Ralph V Clayman, Vinay Durbhakula, William M Atallah, Aymon Ali, Jamie Landman, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"Aspiration Technologies in Flexible Ureteroscopic Urolithiasis Treatment: A Disruptive Concept in Pursuit of a Stone-Free Future.","authors":"Eve Frangopoulos, Ziv Savin, Ralph V Clayman, Vinay Durbhakula, William M Atallah, Aymon Ali, Jamie Landman, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1177/08927790251364285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic innovation has played a pivotal role in advancing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Integration of aspiration technology into flexible ureteroscopes (fURS), termed direct in-scope suction (DISS), and into ureteral access sheaths (s-UAS) are the most recent and rapidly progressing advancements. Aspiration technologies aim to augment stone-free rates (SFR) associated with traditional RIRS and may provide an alternative to retrograde management of large calculi typically managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This systematic and narrative review aims to consolidate the current evidence on aspiration devices used in RIRS. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Using the Covidence platform, a literature search was conducted including the PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to October 2024. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613059). Studies were categorized based on level of evidence and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and large-scale prospective studies; papers were excluded due to expired technology or absence of a traditional fURS comparator group. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Literature search yielded 232 articles. Following exclusion and manual review, 11 studies (1 RCT, 8 comparative cohort studies, and 2 large-scale observational studies) were selected for analysis. Assessing level 1 evidence, immediate and final SFRs were significantly higher in s-UAS groups. S-UAS was also superior to traditional fURS in achieving superior SFR for the management of renal calculi with level 3 evidence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Early studies utilizing contemporary aspiration technologies demonstrated superior efficacy and efficiency with respect to immediate SFR and operative times in patients undergoing fURS for renal stones between 1 and 2 cm compared with traditional fURS. Future studies adhering to standardized SFR criteria with postoperative thin-slice (2 mm) noncontrast computed tomography scanning is warranted to more precisely assess the effectiveness of aspiration technology-associated SFR values.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"829-840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251364285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic innovation has played a pivotal role in advancing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Integration of aspiration technology into flexible ureteroscopes (fURS), termed direct in-scope suction (DISS), and into ureteral access sheaths (s-UAS) are the most recent and rapidly progressing advancements. Aspiration technologies aim to augment stone-free rates (SFR) associated with traditional RIRS and may provide an alternative to retrograde management of large calculi typically managed with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This systematic and narrative review aims to consolidate the current evidence on aspiration devices used in RIRS. Methods: Using the Covidence platform, a literature search was conducted including the PubMed and Web of Science databases from inception to October 2024. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613059). Studies were categorized based on level of evidence and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparative observational studies, and large-scale prospective studies; papers were excluded due to expired technology or absence of a traditional fURS comparator group. Results: Literature search yielded 232 articles. Following exclusion and manual review, 11 studies (1 RCT, 8 comparative cohort studies, and 2 large-scale observational studies) were selected for analysis. Assessing level 1 evidence, immediate and final SFRs were significantly higher in s-UAS groups. S-UAS was also superior to traditional fURS in achieving superior SFR for the management of renal calculi with level 3 evidence. Conclusion: Early studies utilizing contemporary aspiration technologies demonstrated superior efficacy and efficiency with respect to immediate SFR and operative times in patients undergoing fURS for renal stones between 1 and 2 cm compared with traditional fURS. Future studies adhering to standardized SFR criteria with postoperative thin-slice (2 mm) noncontrast computed tomography scanning is warranted to more precisely assess the effectiveness of aspiration technology-associated SFR values.

软性输尿管镜下尿石症治疗中的抽吸技术:追求无结石未来的颠覆性概念。
内镜创新在推进逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中发挥了关键作用。将抽吸技术整合到柔性输尿管镜(fURS)中,称为直接镜内抽吸(DISS),并将其整合到输尿管通路鞘(s-UAS)中是最新和快速发展的进展。抽吸技术旨在提高与传统RIRS相关的无石率(SFR),并可能提供逆行治疗大结石的替代方案,通常采用经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)。这篇系统的叙述性综述旨在巩固RIRS中使用的吸音装置的现有证据。方法:利用covid平台检索PubMed和Web of Science数据库自成立至2024年10月的文献。该系统评价已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024613059)。研究根据证据水平进行分类,包括随机对照试验(rct)、比较观察性研究和大规模前瞻性研究;由于技术过期或缺乏传统的fURS比较组,论文被排除在外。结果:文献检索得到232篇。经排除和人工回顾,共选择11项研究(1项随机对照试验、8项比较队列研究和2项大规模观察性研究)进行分析。评估1级证据,s-UAS组的即时和最终sfr显著升高。S-UAS在治疗肾结石方面也优于传统fURS,具有3级证据。结论:早期研究表明,与传统的fURS相比,采用现代抽吸技术对1 - 2 cm的肾结石进行fURS的患者在立即SFR和手术时间方面具有优越的疗效和效率。未来的研究坚持标准化的SFR标准,术后薄层(2mm)非对比计算机断层扫描,以更准确地评估吸入技术相关SFR值的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信