Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Short-Term Cognitive Rehabilitation Protocols on the Improvement of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 2.1 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jare/6616509
Arezoo Mojarrad, Esmaeil Sadri Damirchi, Ali Sheykholeslami, Ali Rezaeisharif, Vahid Abbasi, Mohammadreza Noroozi Homayoon
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Short-Term Cognitive Rehabilitation Protocols on the Improvement of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Arezoo Mojarrad, Esmaeil Sadri Damirchi, Ali Sheykholeslami, Ali Rezaeisharif, Vahid Abbasi, Mohammadreza Noroozi Homayoon","doi":"10.1155/jare/6616509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Today, Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common diseases, especially in old age, and it is important to help recognize and treat this disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and short-term cognitive rehabilitation protocols on the improvement of depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. <b>Methods:</b> The research method was an extended experiment with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population included all patients over 65 years of age with mild Alzheimer's who had been referred to a neurologist in 2020, and among these people, 60 people were selected through available sampling and then randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. Then, the independent variables of the tDCS method for 10 sessions of 20 min once a week were applied to an experimental group and a short-term cognitive rehabilitation program of 9 sessions (90 min each session) was applied once a week to the second experimental group, and no intervention was performed on the third group. After the end of the intervention, the post-test was conducted with an interval of 1 week on the experimental and control groups. After 1 month, the studied groups were followed up again. A neuropsychological questionnaire (NPI) was used to collect information. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that both studied methods caused a significant reduction in depression in both the post-test and follow-up periods, but only the tDCS method was able to maintain its reduction in the follow-up period. Also, both methods have caused a significant improvement in the anxiety variable both during the post-test and during the follow-up period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, it can be concluded that both methods can be used to improve the symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6616509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/6616509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Today, Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common diseases, especially in old age, and it is important to help recognize and treat this disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and short-term cognitive rehabilitation protocols on the improvement of depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Methods: The research method was an extended experiment with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population included all patients over 65 years of age with mild Alzheimer's who had been referred to a neurologist in 2020, and among these people, 60 people were selected through available sampling and then randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. Then, the independent variables of the tDCS method for 10 sessions of 20 min once a week were applied to an experimental group and a short-term cognitive rehabilitation program of 9 sessions (90 min each session) was applied once a week to the second experimental group, and no intervention was performed on the third group. After the end of the intervention, the post-test was conducted with an interval of 1 week on the experimental and control groups. After 1 month, the studied groups were followed up again. A neuropsychological questionnaire (NPI) was used to collect information. Results: The results showed that both studied methods caused a significant reduction in depression in both the post-test and follow-up periods, but only the tDCS method was able to maintain its reduction in the follow-up period. Also, both methods have caused a significant improvement in the anxiety variable both during the post-test and during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that both methods can be used to improve the symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease.

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)与短期认知康复治疗对轻度阿尔茨海默病患者抑郁和焦虑症状改善效果的比较
目的:今天,阿尔茨海默病是最常见的疾病之一,尤其是在老年人中,帮助认识和治疗这种疾病是很重要的。本研究的目的是比较经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和短期认知康复方案对轻度阿尔茨海默病患者抑郁和焦虑症状的改善效果。方法:采用扩展实验法,设2个实验组和1个对照组。统计人群包括所有65岁以上的轻度阿尔茨海默氏症患者,他们在2020年转诊给神经科医生,在这些人中,通过现有的抽样选择了60人,然后随机分为两个实验组和一个对照组。然后,实验组采用tDCS方法的自变量,每次20分钟,每周1次,每次10次;第二实验组采用短期认知康复方案,每次90分钟,每周1次,第三组不进行干预。干预结束后,实验组和对照组每隔一周进行后测。1个月后,再次对实验组进行随访。采用神经心理学问卷(NPI)收集资料。结果:结果表明,两种研究方法在测试后和随访期间均能显著减少抑郁,但只有tDCS方法能够在随访期间保持其减少。此外,两种方法都在测试后和随访期间显著改善了焦虑变量。结论:因此,两种方法均可改善轻度阿尔茨海默病患者的抑郁和焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信