The effect of self-management and subjective recovery on social functioning in people with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study based on a community mental health centre.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Yeliz Karaçar, Seher Kaşlı, Kerime Bademli, Gönül Yavuz Çoşğun
{"title":"The effect of self-management and subjective recovery on social functioning in people with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study based on a community mental health centre.","authors":"Yeliz Karaçar, Seher Kaşlı, Kerime Bademli, Gönül Yavuz Çoşğun","doi":"10.1177/00207640251357076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can affect an individual's social functioning in various ways.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to determine the self-management and subjective recovery levels of individuals with schizophrenia and to examine the effects of these variables on their level of social functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on individuals with schizophrenia who were followed up at a community mental health centre. Data were collected using the 'Chronic Illness Self-Management Scale', 'Social Functionality Assessment Scale' and 'Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale'. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation analysis, and a stepwise multiple regression model were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subjective recovery of the participants was 52.56 (<i>SD</i> 19.95), social functioning 39.18 (<i>SD</i> 7.76), self-stigmatisation 2.49 (<i>SD</i> 0.93), coping with stigmatisation 2.95 (<i>SD</i> 0.70), health care effectiveness 3.22 (<i>SD</i> 0.93), and adherence to treatment 3.90 (<i>SD</i> 0.93). According to the Pearson correlation test, a statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between self-management, subjective recovery and social functioning (<i>r</i> = .595 and .525, <i>p</i> ⩽ .001). Subjective recovery, self-stigmatisation, and healthcare effectiveness levels explained 44.7% of the total variance in social functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the most important predictors of social functioning were subjective recovery, self-stigmatisation, and health care effectiveness self-management. To improve social functioning in schizophrenia, the development of self-management strategies that increase subjective recovery and promote social integration is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251357076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251357076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can affect an individual's social functioning in various ways.

Aims: This study aimed to determine the self-management and subjective recovery levels of individuals with schizophrenia and to examine the effects of these variables on their level of social functioning.

Methods: The study was conducted on individuals with schizophrenia who were followed up at a community mental health centre. Data were collected using the 'Chronic Illness Self-Management Scale', 'Social Functionality Assessment Scale' and 'Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale'. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation analysis, and a stepwise multiple regression model were used.

Results: The subjective recovery of the participants was 52.56 (SD 19.95), social functioning 39.18 (SD 7.76), self-stigmatisation 2.49 (SD 0.93), coping with stigmatisation 2.95 (SD 0.70), health care effectiveness 3.22 (SD 0.93), and adherence to treatment 3.90 (SD 0.93). According to the Pearson correlation test, a statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between self-management, subjective recovery and social functioning (r = .595 and .525, p ⩽ .001). Subjective recovery, self-stigmatisation, and healthcare effectiveness levels explained 44.7% of the total variance in social functioning.

Conclusion: In this study, the most important predictors of social functioning were subjective recovery, self-stigmatisation, and health care effectiveness self-management. To improve social functioning in schizophrenia, the development of self-management strategies that increase subjective recovery and promote social integration is recommended.

自我管理和主观康复对精神分裂症患者社会功能的影响:基于社区精神卫生中心的横断面研究
背景:精神分裂症是一种精神疾病,可以通过各种方式影响个体的社会功能。目的:本研究旨在确定精神分裂症患者的自我管理和主观恢复水平,并检查这些变量对其社会功能水平的影响。方法:对在社区精神卫生中心随访的精神分裂症患者进行研究。使用“慢性疾病自我管理量表”、“社会功能评估量表”和“主观康复评估量表”收集数据。采用描述性统计、Pearson相关分析和逐步多元回归模型。结果:受试者的主观恢复为52.56 (SD 19.95),社会功能为39.18 (SD 7.76),自我污名化为2.49 (SD 0.93),应对污名化为2.95 (SD 0.70),保健效果为3.22 (SD 0.93),治疗依从性为3.90 (SD 0.93)。根据Pearson相关检验,自我管理、主观恢复与社会功能之间存在统计学上显著的中度正相关(r =。595和.525,p≤.001)。主观恢复、自我污名化和医疗保健有效性水平解释了社会功能总方差的44.7%。结论:在本研究中,最重要的社会功能预测因子是主观恢复、自我污名化和医疗保健有效性自我管理。为了改善精神分裂症患者的社会功能,建议制定自我管理策略,增加主观恢复和促进社会融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信