Tumor Deposits in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as a Risk Factor of Peritoneal Metastasis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.113099
Alberto Vilar Tabanera, Manuel Díez Alonso, Yousef Allaoua, Lucas Casalduero, Fernando Mendoza Moreno, Félix Mañes, Belén Matías, Lucía Diego, Cristina Vera Mansilla, Laura Castellá Bataller, Raúl Diaz-Pedrero, Miguel A Ortega, Melchor Álvarez de Mon, Alberto Gutiérrez
{"title":"Tumor Deposits in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as a Risk Factor of Peritoneal Metastasis.","authors":"Alberto Vilar Tabanera, Manuel Díez Alonso, Yousef Allaoua, Lucas Casalduero, Fernando Mendoza Moreno, Félix Mañes, Belén Matías, Lucía Diego, Cristina Vera Mansilla, Laura Castellá Bataller, Raúl Diaz-Pedrero, Miguel A Ortega, Melchor Álvarez de Mon, Alberto Gutiérrez","doi":"10.7150/ijms.113099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although tumor deposits (TD) have been known for almost a century, their origin and mode of spread remain controversial. The main objective is to analyze the prognostic value of tumor deposits in non-metastatic colorectal cancer as a risk factor of global recurrence, locoregional recurrence, liver and lung metastasis and specially for peritoneal metastasis (PM). <b>Methods</b>: This study analyzed 1,425 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Four groups were built, according to the presence or absence of Lymph Node Metastasis (LNM) or TD. <b>Results</b>: The global recurrence rate in patients with TDs was significantly higher than those without TDs (17.8% vs 60.8%; p<0.001). Patients with TDs had a lower survival and suffered higher rates of liver metastasis (8.6% vs 26.7%; p<0.001); OR of 4.244 (95% CI: 3.004-5.994) and lung metastasis (7.4% vs 19.3%; p<0.001); (OR 3.585;95% CI: 2.397-5.362). However, the main differences were found in PM (4.7 % vs 26.1 %; p<0.001); (OR: 7.511 (95% CI:5.092-11.079). Distribution by groups shows that patients with TD and LNM had a higher rate of PM. Patients with TD without any LMN had higher PM rate than those with LNM without TD. In stage III, patients with TD suffered higher rates of PM, (26.1% vs 10.9%); p< 0.001). OR: 3.075 (95% CI: 1.969-4.803). <b>Conclusions</b>: The presence of TD increases the risk of peritoneal metastasis. Patients with TD without LNM had higher rate of peritoneal metastasis than those with LNM without TD. TD have independent prognostic value and provide complementary information. Prognostic value of TDs is underestimated in the current TNM system.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 13","pages":"3162-3173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.113099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although tumor deposits (TD) have been known for almost a century, their origin and mode of spread remain controversial. The main objective is to analyze the prognostic value of tumor deposits in non-metastatic colorectal cancer as a risk factor of global recurrence, locoregional recurrence, liver and lung metastasis and specially for peritoneal metastasis (PM). Methods: This study analyzed 1,425 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Four groups were built, according to the presence or absence of Lymph Node Metastasis (LNM) or TD. Results: The global recurrence rate in patients with TDs was significantly higher than those without TDs (17.8% vs 60.8%; p<0.001). Patients with TDs had a lower survival and suffered higher rates of liver metastasis (8.6% vs 26.7%; p<0.001); OR of 4.244 (95% CI: 3.004-5.994) and lung metastasis (7.4% vs 19.3%; p<0.001); (OR 3.585;95% CI: 2.397-5.362). However, the main differences were found in PM (4.7 % vs 26.1 %; p<0.001); (OR: 7.511 (95% CI:5.092-11.079). Distribution by groups shows that patients with TD and LNM had a higher rate of PM. Patients with TD without any LMN had higher PM rate than those with LNM without TD. In stage III, patients with TD suffered higher rates of PM, (26.1% vs 10.9%); p< 0.001). OR: 3.075 (95% CI: 1.969-4.803). Conclusions: The presence of TD increases the risk of peritoneal metastasis. Patients with TD without LNM had higher rate of peritoneal metastasis than those with LNM without TD. TD have independent prognostic value and provide complementary information. Prognostic value of TDs is underestimated in the current TNM system.

非转移性结直肠癌中的肿瘤沉积是腹膜转移的危险因素。
背景:虽然肿瘤沉积(TD)已被发现近一个世纪,但其起源和传播方式仍然存在争议。主要目的是分析肿瘤沉积物在非转移性结直肠癌中作为整体复发、局部复发、肝和肺转移,特别是腹膜转移(PM)的危险因素的预后价值。方法:本研究分析了1425例非转移性结直肠癌患者。根据有无淋巴结转移(LNM)或TD分为四组。结果:TDs患者的全球复发率显著高于无TDs患者(17.8% vs 60.8%;结论:TD的存在增加了腹膜转移的风险。无LNM的TD患者腹膜转移率高于无TD的LNM患者。TD具有独立的预后价值,并提供补充信息。目前的TNM系统低估了TDs的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信