Anshuman Saha, A P Anila, K V Pavan, Arpana Iyengar, Anil Vasudevan
{"title":"Inferior Vena Cava/Aorta Diameter Index for the Evaluation of Intravascular Volume Status in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome.","authors":"Anshuman Saha, A P Anila, K V Pavan, Arpana Iyengar, Anil Vasudevan","doi":"10.1007/s13312-025-00154-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To correlate the inferior vena cava/aorta diameter (IVC/Ao index) in children with nephrotic syndrome with clinical indicators of volume status, and to compare the IVC/Ao index between children in relapse and in remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective longitudinal study included children aged 2-18 years presenting with relapsed nephrotic syndrome. Low intravascular volume status was diagnosed if two of the three criteria (tachycardia, hypotension, prolonged capillary filling time) were present. Sonographic measurements of the IVC and aorta diameter were obtained by a single observer at recruitment and after achieving remission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and three children (73 boys) with a median (Q1, Q3) age 72 (24, 216) months were recruited. 26 (25%) children had low intravascular volume at recruitment. The mean (SD) IVC/Ao index was lower in low volume status compared to normal volume status [0.74 (0.2) vs 0.83 (0.1); P = 0.090]. The correlation between IVC/Ao index and heart rate (r = -0.29, P = 0.003) and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.23, P = 0.018) was weak. IVC/Ao index was not an independent predictor of volume status (OR = 0.04, P = 0.331). The mean (SD) IVC/Ao index increased significantly from when in relapse to remission [0.94 (0.1) vs 1.05 (0.2), respectively; P = 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IVC/Ao index was lower in relapse than in remission, and did not predict low intravascular volume status independently.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-025-00154-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To correlate the inferior vena cava/aorta diameter (IVC/Ao index) in children with nephrotic syndrome with clinical indicators of volume status, and to compare the IVC/Ao index between children in relapse and in remission.
Methods: This prospective longitudinal study included children aged 2-18 years presenting with relapsed nephrotic syndrome. Low intravascular volume status was diagnosed if two of the three criteria (tachycardia, hypotension, prolonged capillary filling time) were present. Sonographic measurements of the IVC and aorta diameter were obtained by a single observer at recruitment and after achieving remission.
Results: One hundred and three children (73 boys) with a median (Q1, Q3) age 72 (24, 216) months were recruited. 26 (25%) children had low intravascular volume at recruitment. The mean (SD) IVC/Ao index was lower in low volume status compared to normal volume status [0.74 (0.2) vs 0.83 (0.1); P = 0.090]. The correlation between IVC/Ao index and heart rate (r = -0.29, P = 0.003) and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.23, P = 0.018) was weak. IVC/Ao index was not an independent predictor of volume status (OR = 0.04, P = 0.331). The mean (SD) IVC/Ao index increased significantly from when in relapse to remission [0.94 (0.1) vs 1.05 (0.2), respectively; P = 0.001].
Conclusions: The IVC/Ao index was lower in relapse than in remission, and did not predict low intravascular volume status independently.
期刊介绍:
The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are:
-To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health.
-To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research.
-To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics.
-To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.