Marginal Fit of Three Commonly Used Veneers for Smile Enhancement: An In Vitro Study.

IF 2.1 Q1 Dentistry
Vinod Bandela, Shital Sonune, Ram Basany, Bharathi Munagapati, Saif Faruqi, Saraswathi Kanaparthi, Reef Basher Saad Alkayid, Wroud Alturqi Alshammari, Alreem Abdulaziz Alnuman, Eatedal Mukhlef Alruwaili, Miad Abdulnasser Alahmed, Almas Bassam Aljoufi, Haya Abdulrahman Alrayes, Munirah Saleh Alabid, Doaa Abdelaziz A Helal
{"title":"Marginal Fit of Three Commonly Used Veneers for Smile Enhancement: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Vinod Bandela, Shital Sonune, Ram Basany, Bharathi Munagapati, Saif Faruqi, Saraswathi Kanaparthi, Reef Basher Saad Alkayid, Wroud Alturqi Alshammari, Alreem Abdulaziz Alnuman, Eatedal Mukhlef Alruwaili, Miad Abdulnasser Alahmed, Almas Bassam Aljoufi, Haya Abdulrahman Alrayes, Munirah Saleh Alabid, Doaa Abdelaziz A Helal","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1810443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the marginal fit of three most commonly used veneers in dentistry.A maxillary central incisor was embedded in a self-cure acrylic resin block, with the crown and 2 mm of the root exposed to facilitate standardized tooth preparation. Following the preparation, 30 elastomeric impressions were made to produce master casts. These working dies were then randomly allocated to three experimental groups, each consisting of 15 samples. Group I comprised indirect composite veneers (ICV), fabricated using laboratory composite resin. Group II included pressable ceramic veneers (PCV), manufactured using heat-pressed lithium disilicate. Group III consisted of computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) ceramic veneers, fabricated through digital milling of lithium disilicate blocks. All veneers were fabricated in accordance with the respective manufacturer's guidelines and were carefully repositioned on the prepared tooth to evaluate the marginal discrepancy using a stereomicroscope.Three pre-designated points-mesio-labial, mid-labial, and disto-labial and mesio-palatal, mid-palatal, and disto-palatal on the labial and palatal margins-were measured. The values were recorded and analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test using SPSS software.ICV showed more variation with mean discrepancy of 189.24 ± 25.17 µm at cervical margin and 79.01 ± 11.68 µm at palatal area. PCV showed less variation with mean discrepancy of 48.2 ± 8.35 µm and 40.58 ± 9.47 µm at cervical and palatal areas, respectively. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic veneers showed mean discrepancy of 94.24 ± 9.00 µm at cervical and 52.72 ± 16.33 µm at palatal areas.Pressable ceramic veneers showed the best marginal fit at both cervical and palatal margins followed by CAD/CAM veneers. Indirect composite veneers showed poorest marginal fit. The marginal discrepancy values were within the clinically acceptable range for PCV and CAD/CAM ceramic veneers.It is of paramount importance that the dentist should choose wisely the veneer material taking the marginal fit into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1810443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the marginal fit of three most commonly used veneers in dentistry.A maxillary central incisor was embedded in a self-cure acrylic resin block, with the crown and 2 mm of the root exposed to facilitate standardized tooth preparation. Following the preparation, 30 elastomeric impressions were made to produce master casts. These working dies were then randomly allocated to three experimental groups, each consisting of 15 samples. Group I comprised indirect composite veneers (ICV), fabricated using laboratory composite resin. Group II included pressable ceramic veneers (PCV), manufactured using heat-pressed lithium disilicate. Group III consisted of computer-aided designing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) ceramic veneers, fabricated through digital milling of lithium disilicate blocks. All veneers were fabricated in accordance with the respective manufacturer's guidelines and were carefully repositioned on the prepared tooth to evaluate the marginal discrepancy using a stereomicroscope.Three pre-designated points-mesio-labial, mid-labial, and disto-labial and mesio-palatal, mid-palatal, and disto-palatal on the labial and palatal margins-were measured. The values were recorded and analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test using SPSS software.ICV showed more variation with mean discrepancy of 189.24 ± 25.17 µm at cervical margin and 79.01 ± 11.68 µm at palatal area. PCV showed less variation with mean discrepancy of 48.2 ± 8.35 µm and 40.58 ± 9.47 µm at cervical and palatal areas, respectively. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic veneers showed mean discrepancy of 94.24 ± 9.00 µm at cervical and 52.72 ± 16.33 µm at palatal areas.Pressable ceramic veneers showed the best marginal fit at both cervical and palatal margins followed by CAD/CAM veneers. Indirect composite veneers showed poorest marginal fit. The marginal discrepancy values were within the clinically acceptable range for PCV and CAD/CAM ceramic veneers.It is of paramount importance that the dentist should choose wisely the veneer material taking the marginal fit into account.

三种常用贴面增强微笑边缘贴合的体外研究
本研究的目的是评估三种最常用的贴面在牙科的边缘配合。上颌中切牙嵌入自固化丙烯酸树脂块中,露出牙冠和牙根2mm,便于标准化牙齿准备。在准备之后,制作了30个弹性体压模来生产母模。然后将这些工作模具随机分配到三个实验组,每个实验组由15个样本组成。第一组由间接复合贴面(ICV)组成,使用实验室复合树脂制造。第二组包括可压陶瓷单板(PCV),使用热压二硅酸锂制造。第三组包括计算机辅助设计(CAD)/计算机辅助制造(CAM)陶瓷贴面,通过二硅酸锂块的数字铣削制造。所有贴面都按照各自制造商的指导方针制作,并仔细地重新定位在准备好的牙齿上,使用体视显微镜评估边缘差异。测量了三个预先指定的点——中唇、中唇、离唇和中腭、中腭和离腭在唇和腭边缘。记录数据,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验,采用SPSS软件进行分析。ICV差异较大,颈缘平均差异为189.24±25.17µm,腭区平均差异为79.01±11.68µm。PCV变化较小,颈、腭区的平均差异分别为48.2±8.35µm和40.58±9.47µm。CAD/ cam制作的陶瓷贴面在颈部的平均差异为94.24±9.00µm,在腭区为52.72±16.33µm。可压性陶瓷贴面在颈、腭缘贴面效果最佳,其次为CAD/CAM贴面。间接复合贴面的边缘贴合最差。PCV和CAD/CAM陶瓷贴面的边缘差异值在临床可接受的范围内。牙医应明智地选择贴面材料,并考虑到边缘贴合,这是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信