Interpreting the clinical outcomes to date for AML-directed CAR T cell therapies.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Allison J Li, Jae H Park
{"title":"Interpreting the clinical outcomes to date for AML-directed CAR T cell therapies.","authors":"Allison J Li, Jae H Park","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapies hold potential as a new therapeutic approach for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML), but development has been challenging due to difficulty identifying the optimal targeting antigen. AML exhibits heterogenous and overlapping antigen expression with normal hematopoietic cells, raising concerns for poor efficacy and on-target/off-tumor hematotoxicity. However, it is not clear that these concerns have been fully borne out in available clinical data. Here, we review clinical studies of AML CAR T therapies with a focus on critically evaluating efficacy and toxicities.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Encouraging responses have been reported in a notable proportion of patients in published trials, especially when taking into consideration that patients have treatment-resistant disease after multiple lines of therapy. Rates of cytopenias after AML CAR T therapies vary and there are insufficient data to delineate whether they are due to on-target toxicity or off-target effects such as low marrow reserve and myelosuppressive inflammatory sequelae.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>These studies highlight the need for continued optimization of CAR T design and treatment strategies to enhance efficacy and reduce toxicities in AML. Further studies are needed to better understand the frequency/severity of cytopenias after AML CAR T therapies and to clarify the underlying on-/off-target mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapies hold potential as a new therapeutic approach for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML), but development has been challenging due to difficulty identifying the optimal targeting antigen. AML exhibits heterogenous and overlapping antigen expression with normal hematopoietic cells, raising concerns for poor efficacy and on-target/off-tumor hematotoxicity. However, it is not clear that these concerns have been fully borne out in available clinical data. Here, we review clinical studies of AML CAR T therapies with a focus on critically evaluating efficacy and toxicities.

Recent findings: Encouraging responses have been reported in a notable proportion of patients in published trials, especially when taking into consideration that patients have treatment-resistant disease after multiple lines of therapy. Rates of cytopenias after AML CAR T therapies vary and there are insufficient data to delineate whether they are due to on-target toxicity or off-target effects such as low marrow reserve and myelosuppressive inflammatory sequelae.

Summary: These studies highlight the need for continued optimization of CAR T design and treatment strategies to enhance efficacy and reduce toxicities in AML. Further studies are needed to better understand the frequency/severity of cytopenias after AML CAR T therapies and to clarify the underlying on-/off-target mechanisms.

解释迄今为止aml靶向CAR - T细胞疗法的临床结果。
综述目的:嵌合抗原受体(CAR) T疗法有望成为治疗复发/难治性急性髓性白血病(R/R AML)的新方法,但由于难以确定最佳靶向抗原,其发展一直具有挑战性。AML与正常造血细胞表现出异质和重叠的抗原表达,引起了对疗效差和靶向/非肿瘤血液毒性的关注。然而,目前尚不清楚这些担忧是否已在现有的临床数据中得到充分证实。在这里,我们回顾了AML CAR - T疗法的临床研究,重点是批判性地评估疗效和毒性。最近的发现:在已发表的试验中,有相当比例的患者报告了令人鼓舞的反应,特别是考虑到患者在接受多种治疗后患有治疗耐药疾病。AML CAR - T治疗后的细胞减少率各不相同,没有足够的数据来描述它们是由于靶毒性还是脱靶效应,如低骨髓储备和骨髓抑制性炎症后遗症。总结:这些研究强调了CAR - T设计和治疗策略的持续优化的必要性,以提高AML的疗效和降低毒性。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解AML CAR - T治疗后细胞减少的频率/严重程度,并阐明潜在的靶向/脱靶机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信