Osteoporosis care in primary care settings: a national UK e-survey

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ashley Hawarden, Laurna Bullock, Natasha Marie Cox, Elaine Nicholls, Jo Protheroe, Clare Jinks, Zoe Paskins
{"title":"Osteoporosis care in primary care settings: a national UK e-survey","authors":"Ashley Hawarden,&nbsp;Laurna Bullock,&nbsp;Natasha Marie Cox,&nbsp;Elaine Nicholls,&nbsp;Jo Protheroe,&nbsp;Clare Jinks,&nbsp;Zoe Paskins","doi":"10.1007/s11657-025-01591-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>An electronic survey of 341 UK primary care staff identified barriers to evidence-based osteoporosis care including low confidence in clinical skills, the complex nature of decision-making, insufficient incentivisation and lack of systematic case finding. Opportunities to enhance osteoporosis care may include enhanced education and wider utilisation of the extended workforce.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the beliefs, confidence and practices of general practice staff in the care of people with, or at increased risk of, osteoporotic fractures and the association between professional role and beliefs and confidence about osteoporosis care.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>An electronic survey was designed and distributed to UK general practice staff, including healthcare professionals (HCPs) and non-healthcare professionals (non-HCPs). Content was informed by UK clinical guidelines, a scoping review and patient and clinical stakeholder input. Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test were utilised for analysis, with free text responses analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred forty-one responses were obtained (309 HCPs, 32 non-HCPs). Most responding HCPs (173, 62.2%) and non-HCPs (17, 70.8%) reported osteoporosis management of moderate priority. The majority of HCPs (228, 73.8%) agreed that they were worried about osteoporosis medicines causing unpleasant side effects. Most respondents (314, 98.7%) reported GPs as involved in osteoporosis care, followed by Pharmacists (241, 75.8%) and Practice Nurses (159, 50.0%). GPs and Pharmacists reported the highest level of agreement with confidence in osteoporosis medicine related skills. Fewer than a third of respondents reported systematic invitation of patients with risk factors (fracture, steroids or falls) for assessment. Free text responses indicated problems with communication between primary and secondary care, challenging decision-making, limited access to resources (e.g. DXA scan, dentistry) and insufficient incentivisation as barriers to delivery of recommended osteoporosis care.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Identified opportunities to improve osteoporosis care include improved education, incentivisation, automated case finding and involvement of the wider primary care workforce, particularly Pharmacists.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-025-01591-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary

An electronic survey of 341 UK primary care staff identified barriers to evidence-based osteoporosis care including low confidence in clinical skills, the complex nature of decision-making, insufficient incentivisation and lack of systematic case finding. Opportunities to enhance osteoporosis care may include enhanced education and wider utilisation of the extended workforce.

Purpose

To investigate the beliefs, confidence and practices of general practice staff in the care of people with, or at increased risk of, osteoporotic fractures and the association between professional role and beliefs and confidence about osteoporosis care.

Methods

An electronic survey was designed and distributed to UK general practice staff, including healthcare professionals (HCPs) and non-healthcare professionals (non-HCPs). Content was informed by UK clinical guidelines, a scoping review and patient and clinical stakeholder input. Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test were utilised for analysis, with free text responses analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Three hundred forty-one responses were obtained (309 HCPs, 32 non-HCPs). Most responding HCPs (173, 62.2%) and non-HCPs (17, 70.8%) reported osteoporosis management of moderate priority. The majority of HCPs (228, 73.8%) agreed that they were worried about osteoporosis medicines causing unpleasant side effects. Most respondents (314, 98.7%) reported GPs as involved in osteoporosis care, followed by Pharmacists (241, 75.8%) and Practice Nurses (159, 50.0%). GPs and Pharmacists reported the highest level of agreement with confidence in osteoporosis medicine related skills. Fewer than a third of respondents reported systematic invitation of patients with risk factors (fracture, steroids or falls) for assessment. Free text responses indicated problems with communication between primary and secondary care, challenging decision-making, limited access to resources (e.g. DXA scan, dentistry) and insufficient incentivisation as barriers to delivery of recommended osteoporosis care.

Conclusion

Identified opportunities to improve osteoporosis care include improved education, incentivisation, automated case finding and involvement of the wider primary care workforce, particularly Pharmacists.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨质疏松症护理在初级保健设置:一个全国性的英国电子调查。
一项针对341名英国初级保健人员的电子调查确定了基于证据的骨质疏松症护理的障碍,包括对临床技能的信心不足、决策的复杂性、激励不足和缺乏系统的病例发现。加强骨质疏松症护理的机会可能包括加强教育和更广泛地利用扩大的劳动力。目的:调查全科医生在骨质疏松性骨折患者或高危人群护理中的信念、信心和实践,以及职业角色与骨质疏松性骨折护理信念和信心之间的关系。方法:设计并分发一份电子调查给英国全科医生,包括卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)和非卫生保健专业人员(non-HCPs)。内容由英国临床指南,范围审查以及患者和临床利益相关者输入通知。使用描述性统计和Fisher精确检验进行分析,使用反身性主题分析分析自由文本响应。结果:共获得应答341例(HCPs 309例,非HCPs 32例)。大多数有反应的HCPs(173, 62.2%)和非HCPs(17, 70.8%)报告了骨质疏松症的中度优先管理。大多数HCPs(228人,73.8%)认为他们担心骨质疏松药物会产生不良的副作用。受访医师参与骨质疏松护理的人数最多(314人,98.7%),其次是药师(241人,75.8%)和执业护士(159人,50.0%)。全科医生和药剂师报告了对骨质疏松症医学相关技能信心的最高水平的同意。不到三分之一的应答者报告系统地邀请有危险因素(骨折、类固醇或跌倒)的患者进行评估。自由文本回复表明,初级和二级保健之间的沟通问题,具有挑战性的决策,有限的资源获取(例如DXA扫描,牙科)和激励不足是提供推荐骨质疏松症治疗的障碍。结论:确定了改善骨质疏松症护理的机会,包括改进教育、激励、自动化病例发现和更广泛的初级保健工作人员的参与,特别是药剂师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信