Direct in‐scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Parth U. Patel, Michael Uy, Casey Dauw, Wilson Sui, Jeffrey Plott, William W. Roberts, Khurshid R. Ghani
{"title":"Direct in‐scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions","authors":"Parth U. Patel, Michael Uy, Casey Dauw, Wilson Sui, Jeffrey Plott, William W. Roberts, Khurshid R. Ghani","doi":"10.1111/bju.16871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo provide an overview of direct in‐scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy, an emerging technology that integrates suction directly into the ureteroscope with the aim of enhancing stone clearance, improving visualisation, and reducing intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopic stone surgery.MethodsWe performed a narrative review of the current literature and incorporated insights from the authors’ clinical experience using DISS ureteroscopy systems.ResultsDirect in‐scope suction ureteroscopes are either single‐channel or dual‐channel. With single‐channel ureteroscopes, irrigation must alternate with suction. A dual channel allows synchronous irrigation and suction. The suction can be applied continuously or intermittently (alternating with passive drainage). By actively managing intrarenal pressure, DISS may lower the risk of infectious complications and inadvertent laser injury. Unlike traditional ureteroscopy, some DISS systems may reduce the need for a ureteric access sheath (UAS). Early clinical data demonstrate that DISS offers stone‐free rates comparable to standard ureteroscopy, with no increase in major complications. However, performance varies across devices, with trade‐offs related to scope size, flexibility, suction power, and risk of clogging or collecting system collapse. Larger‐calibre DISS ureteroscopes may face deflection limitations in tight calyces as well as the need for a UAS. Refinements in single‐use platforms are addressing these challenges. DISS may be especially beneficial in patients with moderate‐to‐large stone burdens by enabling more efficient fragment evacuation and reducing the need for secondary procedures. Emerging technologies – such as integrated suction‐laser tools and pressure‐monitoring systems – promise to expand DISS capabilities further.ConclusionDirect in‐scope suction ureteroscopy represents a significant evolution in endourological practice by addressing key limitations of standard ureteroscopy, namely, fragment management, intrarenal pressure control, and visualisation. There remains a need for high‐quality level 1 evidence. With ongoing innovation, future DISS systems may offer complete stone clearance.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo provide an overview of direct in‐scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy, an emerging technology that integrates suction directly into the ureteroscope with the aim of enhancing stone clearance, improving visualisation, and reducing intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopic stone surgery.MethodsWe performed a narrative review of the current literature and incorporated insights from the authors’ clinical experience using DISS ureteroscopy systems.ResultsDirect in‐scope suction ureteroscopes are either single‐channel or dual‐channel. With single‐channel ureteroscopes, irrigation must alternate with suction. A dual channel allows synchronous irrigation and suction. The suction can be applied continuously or intermittently (alternating with passive drainage). By actively managing intrarenal pressure, DISS may lower the risk of infectious complications and inadvertent laser injury. Unlike traditional ureteroscopy, some DISS systems may reduce the need for a ureteric access sheath (UAS). Early clinical data demonstrate that DISS offers stone‐free rates comparable to standard ureteroscopy, with no increase in major complications. However, performance varies across devices, with trade‐offs related to scope size, flexibility, suction power, and risk of clogging or collecting system collapse. Larger‐calibre DISS ureteroscopes may face deflection limitations in tight calyces as well as the need for a UAS. Refinements in single‐use platforms are addressing these challenges. DISS may be especially beneficial in patients with moderate‐to‐large stone burdens by enabling more efficient fragment evacuation and reducing the need for secondary procedures. Emerging technologies – such as integrated suction‐laser tools and pressure‐monitoring systems – promise to expand DISS capabilities further.ConclusionDirect in‐scope suction ureteroscopy represents a significant evolution in endourological practice by addressing key limitations of standard ureteroscopy, namely, fragment management, intrarenal pressure control, and visualisation. There remains a need for high‐quality level 1 evidence. With ongoing innovation, future DISS systems may offer complete stone clearance.
直接镜内吸(DISS)输尿管镜:技术、结果和未来方向
目的综述直接镜内吸尿输尿管镜术,这是一种将直接吸尿与输尿管镜相结合的新兴技术,目的是在输尿管镜下结石手术中增强结石清除、改善显像和降低肾内压。方法我们对现有文献进行了叙述性回顾,并结合了作者使用DISS输尿管镜系统的临床经验。结果直接镜内输尿管镜有单通道和双通道两种。使用单通道输尿管镜时,灌洗必须与抽吸交替进行。双通道允许同步灌溉和吸入。吸力可连续或间歇应用(与被动引流交替)。通过积极控制肾内压,DISS可以降低感染并发症和无意激光损伤的风险。与传统输尿管镜检查不同,一些DISS系统可以减少输尿管通路鞘(UAS)的需要。早期临床数据表明,DISS的无结石率与标准输尿管镜检查相当,没有增加主要并发症。然而,不同设备的性能各不相同,需要权衡范围大小、灵活性、吸力以及堵塞或收集系统崩溃的风险。大口径的DISS输尿管镜可能面临狭窄肾盏的偏转限制以及对UAS的需求。单用途平台的改进正在解决这些挑战。DISS通过更有效的碎片清除和减少二次手术的需要,可能对中至大结石负担的患者特别有益。新兴技术,如综合吸激光工具和压力监测系统,有望进一步扩展DISS的能力。结论:直接内吸输尿管镜通过解决标准输尿管镜的主要局限性,即碎片管理、肾内压控制和可视化,代表了尿内外科实践的重大发展。仍然需要高质量的一级证据。随着不断的创新,未来的DISS系统可能会提供完全的结石清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信