Connectedness effects in enumeration of small numbers.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Wei Liu, Xiaoke Zhao, Yating Li, Chunhui Wang, Jingguang Li
{"title":"Connectedness effects in enumeration of small numbers.","authors":"Wei Liu, Xiaoke Zhao, Yating Li, Chunhui Wang, Jingguang Li","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03138-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The connectedness effect is the tendency to perceive connected items as fewer units, such as two connected dots seen as one. It commonly occurs with intermediate numerosity perception alongside the activity of the approximate number system (ANS), indicating that intermediate quantities are perceived as discrete units rather than continuous magnitudes. The present study explored how this effect influences the enumeration of small numerosities (fewer than 5), which are accurately assessed through a mechanism known as subitizing under normal conditions. In the single enumeration task, where participants enumerated 2-4 dots solely from the indicated target patch prior to stimulus presentation, connectivity did not induce underestimation, indicating that subitizing is impervious to the connectedness effect. Conversely, connectivity led to significant underestimation in the dual enumeration task, where participants had to simultaneously estimate dots in both patches and respond upon cueing of the target patch. Furthermore, the connectedness effect is more pronounced in the simultaneous comparison task compared with the sequential task. Weber fractions for small numerosities correlate with those for intermediate numerosities in the simultaneous comparison task, whereas no such correlation is observed in the sequential task. This suggests that subitizing prevails in single/sequential tasks, while estimation takes precedence in dual/simultaneous tasks under attentional load. The connectedness effect does not impact the subitizing mechanism in single tasks, but it occurs alongside estimation regardless of the number regime, leading to significant underestimation in dual tasks. Approximate estimation relies on segmented objects, rather than continuous magnitude, even for very small numerosities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03138-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The connectedness effect is the tendency to perceive connected items as fewer units, such as two connected dots seen as one. It commonly occurs with intermediate numerosity perception alongside the activity of the approximate number system (ANS), indicating that intermediate quantities are perceived as discrete units rather than continuous magnitudes. The present study explored how this effect influences the enumeration of small numerosities (fewer than 5), which are accurately assessed through a mechanism known as subitizing under normal conditions. In the single enumeration task, where participants enumerated 2-4 dots solely from the indicated target patch prior to stimulus presentation, connectivity did not induce underestimation, indicating that subitizing is impervious to the connectedness effect. Conversely, connectivity led to significant underestimation in the dual enumeration task, where participants had to simultaneously estimate dots in both patches and respond upon cueing of the target patch. Furthermore, the connectedness effect is more pronounced in the simultaneous comparison task compared with the sequential task. Weber fractions for small numerosities correlate with those for intermediate numerosities in the simultaneous comparison task, whereas no such correlation is observed in the sequential task. This suggests that subitizing prevails in single/sequential tasks, while estimation takes precedence in dual/simultaneous tasks under attentional load. The connectedness effect does not impact the subitizing mechanism in single tasks, but it occurs alongside estimation regardless of the number regime, leading to significant underestimation in dual tasks. Approximate estimation relies on segmented objects, rather than continuous magnitude, even for very small numerosities.

小数枚举中的连通性效应。
连通性效应是指人们倾向于将连通性的物品视为更少的单位,比如将两个连通性的点视为一个。它通常发生在中间数字感知与近似数字系统(ANS)的活动,表明中间数量被视为离散单位,而不是连续的大小。本研究探讨了这种效应如何影响小数字(小于5)的枚举,在正常情况下,通过称为subbitizing的机制准确评估小数字。在单一枚举任务中,参与者在刺激呈现之前仅从指定的目标斑块中枚举2-4个点,连通性不会引起低估,表明分形不受连通性效应的影响。相反,在双重枚举任务中,连通性导致了显著的低估,参与者必须同时估计两个斑块中的点,并在目标斑块的提示下做出反应。同时比较任务的连通性效应比顺序比较任务更为显著。在同时比较任务中,小数值的韦伯分数与中间数值的韦伯分数相关,而在顺序任务中没有观察到这种相关性。这表明在单/顺序任务中普遍存在细分,而在注意负荷下的双/同步任务中优先存在估计。在单任务中,连通性效应不影响subsubization机制,但它与估计同时发生,无论数量制度如何,导致双任务中显著的低估。近似估计依赖于分割的对象,而不是连续的大小,即使是非常小的数字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信