Perception of the role of Telemedicine in Interstitial Lung Diseases: -Findings from Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory -Society (SIP-IRS) survey.

IF 1.6 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Giorgio Monteleone, Gioele Castelli, Giovanni Franco, Marialuisa Bocchino, Luigi Carroccio, Francesca Lalla, Francesca Cefaloni, Silvia Deidda, Davide Chimera, Rosangela di Liberti, Giuseppe Muscato, Jacopo Simonetti, Bruno Iovene, Francesco Varone, Tommaso Pianigiani, Laura Bergantini, Miriana D'Alessandro, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi, Elena Bargagli, Barbara Ruaro, Paolo Cameli
{"title":"Perception of the role of Telemedicine in Interstitial Lung Diseases: -Findings from Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory -Society (SIP-IRS) survey.","authors":"Giorgio Monteleone, Gioele Castelli, Giovanni Franco, Marialuisa Bocchino, Luigi Carroccio, Francesca Lalla, Francesca Cefaloni, Silvia Deidda, Davide Chimera, Rosangela di Liberti, Giuseppe Muscato, Jacopo Simonetti, Bruno Iovene, Francesco Varone, Tommaso Pianigiani, Laura Bergantini, Miriana D'Alessandro, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi, Elena Bargagli, Barbara Ruaro, Paolo Cameli","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2025.1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Despite its potential, its integration and application still remain limited. Our work aimed to assess pulmonologists' (physicians and trainees) perception regarding the use of TM in ILDs management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national survey was created and distributed to all pulmonologists, both physicians and trainees, affiliated with Società Italiana di Pneumologia/Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS). Responses were collected anonymously and analysed by using descriptive statistical analysis and the chi-square test.  Results: Among 2,906 invited participants, 44 completed the survey. While 95.5% of respondents considered TM useful in ILDs monitoring, only 36% reported its use in clinical practice. Current barriers included reduced availability of TM services (64%) and limited knowledge of TM software (56.8%). Moreover, the majority of participants referred a supportive but not substitutive role of TM in-person consultations, especially in monitoring and patient education. A significant proportion of repliers (over 50%) claimed that it may reduce waiting lists and enhance patient satisfaction (63.6%). However, concerns regarding data security and absence of standardised protocols were also reported.  Conclusions: TM is positively perceived by both physicians and trainees' pulmonologist for ILDs follow-up and educational purposes in ILD management. Nevertheless, its integration and application are still hindered by some concerns such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy as well as lack of standardisation of reimbursement protocols and evolving regulatory frameworks. Broader integration of TM will require to address these challenges through investments in technology, structured protocols, and training initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Despite its potential, its integration and application still remain limited. Our work aimed to assess pulmonologists' (physicians and trainees) perception regarding the use of TM in ILDs management.

Methods: This national survey was created and distributed to all pulmonologists, both physicians and trainees, affiliated with Società Italiana di Pneumologia/Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS). Responses were collected anonymously and analysed by using descriptive statistical analysis and the chi-square test.  Results: Among 2,906 invited participants, 44 completed the survey. While 95.5% of respondents considered TM useful in ILDs monitoring, only 36% reported its use in clinical practice. Current barriers included reduced availability of TM services (64%) and limited knowledge of TM software (56.8%). Moreover, the majority of participants referred a supportive but not substitutive role of TM in-person consultations, especially in monitoring and patient education. A significant proportion of repliers (over 50%) claimed that it may reduce waiting lists and enhance patient satisfaction (63.6%). However, concerns regarding data security and absence of standardised protocols were also reported.  Conclusions: TM is positively perceived by both physicians and trainees' pulmonologist for ILDs follow-up and educational purposes in ILD management. Nevertheless, its integration and application are still hindered by some concerns such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy as well as lack of standardisation of reimbursement protocols and evolving regulatory frameworks. Broader integration of TM will require to address these challenges through investments in technology, structured protocols, and training initiatives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

远程医疗在间质性肺病中的作用:意大利肺病学会/意大利呼吸学会(SIP-IRS)调查的结果。
背景:远程医疗(TM)越来越被认为是治疗间质性肺疾病(ild)的一种有价值的工具。尽管其潜力巨大,但其集成和应用仍然有限。我们的工作旨在评估肺科医生(医生和受训人员)对在ild管理中使用TM的看法。方法:创建并分发给隶属于意大利肺炎学会/意大利呼吸学会(SIP/IRS)的所有肺科医生,包括医生和实习生。采用匿名方式收集反馈,并采用描述性统计分析和卡方检验进行分析。结果:在2906名被邀请的参与者中,有44人完成了调查。虽然95.5%的受访者认为TM对ILDs监测有用,但只有36%的人报告其在临床实践中使用。目前的障碍包括TM服务的可用性降低(64%)和TM软件知识有限(56.8%)。此外,大多数参与者提到了支持而不是替代TM面对面咨询的作用,特别是在监测和患者教育方面。相当大比例(超过50%)的回答者声称这可以减少等候名单和提高患者满意度(63.6%)。但是,也报告了对数据安全和缺乏标准化协议的关切。结论:内科医生和培训生的肺科医生都认为TM对ILD的随访和ILD管理的教育具有积极意义。然而,它的整合和应用仍然受到一些问题的阻碍,如有限的基础设施和数字素养,以及缺乏标准化的报销协议和不断发展的监管框架。更广泛的TM集成将需要通过对技术、结构化协议和培训计划的投资来解决这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信