[Scoping review on the identification and evaluation of available digital applications for bipolar disorder].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1007/s00115-025-01857-z
Taha Johanna Henning, Orestis Rakitzis, Jakob Kaminski, Linda Kokwaro, Daniel Fürstenau, Sonia Lech, Stefanie Schreiter
{"title":"[Scoping review on the identification and evaluation of available digital applications for bipolar disorder].","authors":"Taha Johanna Henning, Orestis Rakitzis, Jakob Kaminski, Linda Kokwaro, Daniel Fürstenau, Sonia Lech, Stefanie Schreiter","doi":"10.1007/s00115-025-01857-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorders require long-term monitoring. Digital applications, such as smartphone apps, offer potential for self-management and early detection but there are uncertainties regarding availability, guideline conformity and evidence. In Germany, specific digital health applications (DiGAs) for bipolar disorders are lacking, highlighting regulatory and healthcare delivery challenges.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This review examines apps for bipolar disorder available in Germany with respect to their functions, availability and evidence base.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between January and March 2025 a systematic search was conducted in the databases MindApps.org and MindTools.io for apps. Functions, research evidence, languages, cost models, and app-store availability were recorded. Additionally, scientific studies on the identified apps were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 apps were identified 11 of which are specifically for bipolar disorders. The functions range from mood and symptom tracking to psychoeducational contents. Of the apps six had published studies but none showed significant improvements in symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although digital interventions show promise for improving the treatment of bipolar disorder, large-scale, methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials with standardized endpoints are still lacking. In Germany no DiGAs specifically designed for this patient group are currently available. Moreover, for sustainable integration into routine care of a chronic condition such as bipolar disorder, dependable reimbursement models and comprehensive long-term studies are also required.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01857-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorders require long-term monitoring. Digital applications, such as smartphone apps, offer potential for self-management and early detection but there are uncertainties regarding availability, guideline conformity and evidence. In Germany, specific digital health applications (DiGAs) for bipolar disorders are lacking, highlighting regulatory and healthcare delivery challenges.

Aim: This review examines apps for bipolar disorder available in Germany with respect to their functions, availability and evidence base.

Material and methods: Between January and March 2025 a systematic search was conducted in the databases MindApps.org and MindTools.io for apps. Functions, research evidence, languages, cost models, and app-store availability were recorded. Additionally, scientific studies on the identified apps were reviewed.

Results: A total of 18 apps were identified 11 of which are specifically for bipolar disorders. The functions range from mood and symptom tracking to psychoeducational contents. Of the apps six had published studies but none showed significant improvements in symptoms.

Discussion: Although digital interventions show promise for improving the treatment of bipolar disorder, large-scale, methodologically rigorous randomized controlled trials with standardized endpoints are still lacking. In Germany no DiGAs specifically designed for this patient group are currently available. Moreover, for sustainable integration into routine care of a chronic condition such as bipolar disorder, dependable reimbursement models and comprehensive long-term studies are also required.

Abstract Image

[对双相情感障碍可用数字应用识别和评估的范围审查]。
背景:双相情感障碍需要长期监测。智能手机应用程序等数字应用程序提供了自我管理和早期发现的潜力,但在可用性、指南符合性和证据方面存在不确定性。在德国,缺乏针对双相情感障碍的特定数字健康应用(diga),这凸显了监管和医疗保健服务方面的挑战。目的:本综述考察了德国双相情感障碍应用程序的功能、可用性和证据基础。材料和方法:在2025年1月至3月期间,在MindApps.org和MindTools数据库中进行了系统检索。IO应用程序。记录功能、研究证据、语言、成本模型和应用商店可用性。此外,对被识别的应用程序进行了科学研究。结果:共确定了18个应用程序,其中11个专门用于双相情感障碍。功能范围从情绪和症状追踪到心理教育内容。在这些应用程序中,有6个发表了研究,但没有一个显示出症状的显著改善。讨论:尽管数字干预显示出改善双相情感障碍治疗的希望,但大规模、方法学上严格的标准化终点随机对照试验仍然缺乏。在德国,目前还没有专门为这一患者群体设计的diga。此外,为了可持续地整合到双相情感障碍等慢性疾病的常规护理中,还需要可靠的报销模式和全面的长期研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信