Visuospatial and Visuomotor Abilities of Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5 2区 心理学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Jing Zhang, Julia Moreira, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, Mary-Mac Chown, Joel Killam, Yang Hou
{"title":"Visuospatial and Visuomotor Abilities of Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Jing Zhang, Julia Moreira, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, Mary-Mac Chown, Joel Killam, Yang Hou","doi":"10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis estimated the group differences between individuals with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explored potential moderators. Systematic literature searches identified 2531 unique articles. Among them, 70 studies (183 effect sizes) were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3503 individuals' visuospatial and visuomotor abilities with NF1 (46.67% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.60 years) and 3127 individuals without NF1 (52.40% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.19 years). Robust standard error estimation techniques and random models were used to calculate standardized group differences. The results showed that individuals with (vs. without) NF1 exhibited significantly lower visuospatial (g =  - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.00, - 0.80], I<sup>2</sup> = 64.59%) and visuomotor abilities (g =  - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.05, - 0.75], I<sup>2</sup> = 74.87%). The moderator analysis revealed that group differences in visuospatial abilities were larger for children with NF1 (g =  - 0.95; 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.84]) than adolescents (g =  - 0.64; 95% CI [- 0.91, - 0.37]) and adults (g =  - 0.73; 95% CI [- 0.88, - 0.58]). Additionally, a greater between-group difference was found when visuospatial abilities were assessed using Judgment of Line Orientation (g =  - 1.06; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.94]) than Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Visual Spatial Index (g =  - 0.70; 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.54]). Sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, IQ, learning disorder, ADHD, types of control group, sampling method, and exclusion criteria of NF1 participants were not significant moderators. The substantial visuospatial and visuomotor deficits in the NF1 population highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, and considerable between-study heterogeneity underscores that further exploration of predictors is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis estimated the group differences between individuals with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explored potential moderators. Systematic literature searches identified 2531 unique articles. Among them, 70 studies (183 effect sizes) were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3503 individuals' visuospatial and visuomotor abilities with NF1 (46.67% female; Mage = 12.60 years) and 3127 individuals without NF1 (52.40% female; Mage = 13.19 years). Robust standard error estimation techniques and random models were used to calculate standardized group differences. The results showed that individuals with (vs. without) NF1 exhibited significantly lower visuospatial (g =  - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.00, - 0.80], I2 = 64.59%) and visuomotor abilities (g =  - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.05, - 0.75], I2 = 74.87%). The moderator analysis revealed that group differences in visuospatial abilities were larger for children with NF1 (g =  - 0.95; 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.84]) than adolescents (g =  - 0.64; 95% CI [- 0.91, - 0.37]) and adults (g =  - 0.73; 95% CI [- 0.88, - 0.58]). Additionally, a greater between-group difference was found when visuospatial abilities were assessed using Judgment of Line Orientation (g =  - 1.06; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.94]) than Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Visual Spatial Index (g =  - 0.70; 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.54]). Sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, IQ, learning disorder, ADHD, types of control group, sampling method, and exclusion criteria of NF1 participants were not significant moderators. The substantial visuospatial and visuomotor deficits in the NF1 population highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, and considerable between-study heterogeneity underscores that further exploration of predictors is needed.

1型神经纤维瘤病患者的视觉空间和视觉运动能力:系统回顾和荟萃分析
该荟萃分析估计了患有和未患有1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)的个体之间的组差异,并探索了潜在的调节因子。系统文献检索确定了2531篇独特的文章。本meta分析共纳入70项研究(183个效应量),涉及3503名NF1患者的视觉空间和视觉运动能力(女性46.67%;年龄12.60岁),无NF1者3127例(女性52.40%;法师= 13.19年)。采用稳健标准误差估计技术和随机模型计算标准化组差。结果表明,NF1的个体(与未NF1的个体相比)表现出明显较低的视觉空间(g = - 0.90;95%可信区间(- 1.00,0.80),I2 = 64.59%)和visuomotor能力(g = - 0.90;95% ci [- 1.05, - 0.75], i2 = 74.87%)。调节分析显示NF1儿童的视觉空间能力组间差异更大(g = - 0.95;95%可信区间(- 1.06,- 0.84))比青少年(g = - 0.64;95%可信区间(- 0.91,- 0.37))和成人(g = - 0.73;95% ci[- 0.88, - 0.58])。此外,当使用判断线方向来评估视觉空间能力时,发现组间差异更大(g = - 1.06;95% CI[- 1.17, - 0.94])高于韦氏智力量表-视觉空间指数(g = - 0.70;95% ci[- 0.86, - 0.54])。性别构成、NF1遗传方式、智商、学习障碍、ADHD、对照组类型、抽样方法、排除标准对NF1参与者的影响不显著。NF1人群中大量的视觉空间和视觉运动缺陷强调了有针对性干预的必要性,研究间的大量异质性强调了进一步探索预测因素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology Review
Neuropsychology Review 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信