Spatial response-code association for loudness but not brightness.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Pui Leng Choon, Alexander Ludwig, Rolf Ulrich, Robert Carl Gunnar Johansson
{"title":"Spatial response-code association for loudness but not brightness.","authors":"Pui Leng Choon, Alexander Ludwig, Rolf Ulrich, Robert Carl Gunnar Johansson","doi":"10.1177/03010066251361080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive associations between stimulus intensity and spatial response codes are thought to influence perceptual discrimination. We examined lateral response-set effects on auditory and visual intensity discrimination in a preregistered study with a large sample (<i>N</i> = 98). Participants responded to loud and bright stimuli using a button located to the left or right of the button used for soft and dim stimuli. In the auditory task, stimulus-response (SR)-mapping affected task-averaged error rates (ERs) but not task-averaged response times (RTs). However, loudness predicted response-side differences in both latency (<math><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>) and accuracy (<math><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>). By comparison, all tests of brightness discrimination supported the null or were inconclusive. Assessments of cross-modality correlations in SR-mapping effects were also inconclusive. These results replicate prior findings of lateral SR-mapping effects in auditory intensity discrimination and clarify inconsistencies in the visual domain. The lack of SR-mapping effects in brightness discrimination, along with inconclusive cross-modal correlations, challenges the notion of a common spatial processing mechanism for auditory and visual intensity comparison. If such a mechanism exists, its effects on visual judgments appear too subtle to be detected even in a large sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066251361080"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251361080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive associations between stimulus intensity and spatial response codes are thought to influence perceptual discrimination. We examined lateral response-set effects on auditory and visual intensity discrimination in a preregistered study with a large sample (N = 98). Participants responded to loud and bright stimuli using a button located to the left or right of the button used for soft and dim stimuli. In the auditory task, stimulus-response (SR)-mapping affected task-averaged error rates (ERs) but not task-averaged response times (RTs). However, loudness predicted response-side differences in both latency (RTLeft-RTRight) and accuracy (ERLeft-ERRight). By comparison, all tests of brightness discrimination supported the null or were inconclusive. Assessments of cross-modality correlations in SR-mapping effects were also inconclusive. These results replicate prior findings of lateral SR-mapping effects in auditory intensity discrimination and clarify inconsistencies in the visual domain. The lack of SR-mapping effects in brightness discrimination, along with inconclusive cross-modal correlations, challenges the notion of a common spatial processing mechanism for auditory and visual intensity comparison. If such a mechanism exists, its effects on visual judgments appear too subtle to be detected even in a large sample.

空间响应代码与响度关联,但与亮度无关。
刺激强度和空间反应代码之间的认知关联被认为影响知觉歧视。我们在一项大样本(N = 98)的预登记研究中检验了横向反应集对听觉和视觉强度辨别的影响。参与者使用位于柔和和暗淡刺激按钮左侧或右侧的按钮对响亮和明亮的刺激做出反应。在听觉任务中,刺激-反应映射影响任务平均错误率,但不影响任务平均反应时间。然而,响度预测了响应侧延迟(rtleft - rtrright)和准确性(ERLeft-ERRight)的差异。通过比较,所有的亮度判别测试都支持无效或不确定。对sr映射效应中跨模态相关性的评估也没有定论。这些结果重复了先前关于听觉强度辨别的横向sr映射效应的发现,并澄清了视觉领域的不一致性。在亮度区分中缺乏sr映射效应,以及不确定的跨模态相关性,挑战了听觉和视觉强度比较的共同空间处理机制的概念。如果存在这样一种机制,它对视觉判断的影响似乎太过微妙,即使在大样本中也无法检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信