Comparison of interobserver and Intraobserver reliability of alpha angle measurements using different types of circles for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnaf006
Özgür Aydin, Onur Hapa, Emre Acar, Mustafa Celtik, Selahattin Agca, Cihangir Turemis, Raif C Yarol, Selahaddin Aydemir
{"title":"Comparison of interobserver and Intraobserver reliability of alpha angle measurements using different types of circles for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.","authors":"Özgür Aydin, Onur Hapa, Emre Acar, Mustafa Celtik, Selahattin Agca, Cihangir Turemis, Raif C Yarol, Selahaddin Aydemir","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alpha angle is a radiological measurement that has been proposed for the detection of cam morphology in patients suspected of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). After analysing published articles on FAIS, it is apparent that different types of circles are used in the measurement of alpha angles. To determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of alpha angle values measured using different types of circles on a 45° Dunn lateral radiograph in patients with symptomatic FAIS. The 45° Dunn lateral radiographs of the operated hips of patients who underwent hip preservation surgery in Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between 2014 and 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Alpha angles were measured manually with transparent goniometers using three different circle types: thin full circle, thin-dashed circle, and thick full circle, and eye estimation without circle insertion. Measurements were made separately by an orthopaedist and a radiologist. A second measurement was made by the radiologist 1 month later for intraobserver reliability. Interobserver reliability for the thin full circle, thin-dashed circle, thick circle, and eye estimation (ICC = 0.645, 0.525, 0.494, and 0.588, respectively). Intraobserver reliability for the thin, thin-dashed, thick line, and eye estimation (ICC= 0.626, 0.681, 0.681, and 0.462 respectively). Interobserver difference of mean values of alpha angles for thin full, thin-dashed, thick full, and eye estimation were 2.7°, 0.9°, 1.1°, and 2.3°, respectively. Intraobserver differences between measurements were 1.5°, 0.9°, 0°, and 1.6°, respectively. Our study demonstrated that interobserver reliability is highest when measurements are made using a thin full circle.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"12 2","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaf006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The alpha angle is a radiological measurement that has been proposed for the detection of cam morphology in patients suspected of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). After analysing published articles on FAIS, it is apparent that different types of circles are used in the measurement of alpha angles. To determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of alpha angle values measured using different types of circles on a 45° Dunn lateral radiograph in patients with symptomatic FAIS. The 45° Dunn lateral radiographs of the operated hips of patients who underwent hip preservation surgery in Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between 2014 and 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Alpha angles were measured manually with transparent goniometers using three different circle types: thin full circle, thin-dashed circle, and thick full circle, and eye estimation without circle insertion. Measurements were made separately by an orthopaedist and a radiologist. A second measurement was made by the radiologist 1 month later for intraobserver reliability. Interobserver reliability for the thin full circle, thin-dashed circle, thick circle, and eye estimation (ICC = 0.645, 0.525, 0.494, and 0.588, respectively). Intraobserver reliability for the thin, thin-dashed, thick line, and eye estimation (ICC= 0.626, 0.681, 0.681, and 0.462 respectively). Interobserver difference of mean values of alpha angles for thin full, thin-dashed, thick full, and eye estimation were 2.7°, 0.9°, 1.1°, and 2.3°, respectively. Intraobserver differences between measurements were 1.5°, 0.9°, 0°, and 1.6°, respectively. Our study demonstrated that interobserver reliability is highest when measurements are made using a thin full circle.

使用不同类型的圆圈测量股骨髋臼撞击综合征的α角的观察者间和观察者内可靠性的比较。
角是一种放射学测量方法,已被提议用于检测疑似股髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)患者的凸轮形态。在分析FAIS上发表的文章后,很明显,不同类型的圆被用于测量α角。确定有症状的FAIS患者在45°Dunn侧位x线片上使用不同类型的圆圈测量α角值的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。回顾性评价2014年至2017年在Dokuz eyyll大学医院行髋关节保留手术患者的45°Dunn侧位片。用透明测角仪手动测量Alpha角,使用三种不同的圆类型:细全圆、细虚线圆和粗全圆,以及不插入圆的眼睛估计。测量分别由骨科医生和放射科医生进行。1个月后,放射科医生进行了第二次测量,以确定观察者内的可靠性。细全圆、细虚线圆、粗圆和眼睛估计的观察者间信度(ICC分别= 0.645、0.525、0.494和0.588)。细线、细虚线、粗线和眼估计的观察者内信度(ICC分别= 0.626、0.681、0.681和0.462)。细饱满、细虚线、粗饱满和眼睛估计的alpha角平均值的观察者间差异分别为2.7°、0.9°、1.1°和2.3°。测量结果之间的观察者内差异分别为1.5°、0.9°、0°和1.6°。我们的研究表明,当使用细圆进行测量时,观察者之间的可靠性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信