Cultural adaptation and content validation of the Watson Caritas patient instrument for a Latin American Spanish context.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Mayut Delgado-Galeano, Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal, Luz-Eugenia Ibáñez-Alfonso, Fabio Camargo-Figuera
{"title":"Cultural adaptation and content validation of the Watson Caritas patient instrument for a Latin American Spanish context.","authors":"Mayut Delgado-Galeano, Beatriz Villamizar-Carvajal, Luz-Eugenia Ibáñez-Alfonso, Fabio Camargo-Figuera","doi":"10.1177/17449871251333620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Humanisation in health services, central to global healthcare systems, emphasises making care more person-centred and compassionate. Person-centred care is central to nursing practice. The transpersonal Caritas relationship exemplifies such person-centred care, and can be evaluated using the Watson Caritas Patient Score (WCPS), which captures patients' subjective perceptions of nursing behaviours.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the validity and reliability of the WCPS instrument in a Spanish context, with hospitalised patients. An analysis was undertaken using the Rasch methodology to test the robustness of the tool in diverse conditions and populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validation study was undertaken to assess the WCPS tool's cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Ethical approval was obtained, alongside authorisation to use the instrument. The Rasch methodology was chosen as it provides a robust and theoretically grounded approach to instrument validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global content validity index was 0.80. Cronbach's α was 0.84 in the first and 0.86 in the second. Factor analysis extracted a single factor with an explanatory power of 65%. The Rasch reliability was 0.88 for items with adequate fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Spanish version of the WCPS has been validated and is a useful tool for measuring the Caritas transpersonal relationship in hospitals, promoting person-centred nursing care. However, the Rasch model validation highlighted the need for further refinement, including adding more questions to address measurement gaps and collapsing categories to reduce data variability under a unidimensional construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871251333620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251333620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Humanisation in health services, central to global healthcare systems, emphasises making care more person-centred and compassionate. Person-centred care is central to nursing practice. The transpersonal Caritas relationship exemplifies such person-centred care, and can be evaluated using the Watson Caritas Patient Score (WCPS), which captures patients' subjective perceptions of nursing behaviours.

Aims: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the WCPS instrument in a Spanish context, with hospitalised patients. An analysis was undertaken using the Rasch methodology to test the robustness of the tool in diverse conditions and populations.

Methods: A validation study was undertaken to assess the WCPS tool's cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Ethical approval was obtained, alongside authorisation to use the instrument. The Rasch methodology was chosen as it provides a robust and theoretically grounded approach to instrument validation.

Results: The global content validity index was 0.80. Cronbach's α was 0.84 in the first and 0.86 in the second. Factor analysis extracted a single factor with an explanatory power of 65%. The Rasch reliability was 0.88 for items with adequate fit.

Conclusions: The Spanish version of the WCPS has been validated and is a useful tool for measuring the Caritas transpersonal relationship in hospitals, promoting person-centred nursing care. However, the Rasch model validation highlighted the need for further refinement, including adding more questions to address measurement gaps and collapsing categories to reduce data variability under a unidimensional construct.

文化适应和内容验证沃森明爱病人仪器拉丁美洲西班牙上下文。
背景:卫生服务的人性化是全球卫生保健系统的核心,强调使护理更加以人为本和富有同情心。以人为本的护理是护理实践的核心。超越个人的明爱关系体现了这种以人为本的护理,可以使用沃森明爱患者评分(WCPS)进行评估,该评分捕捉了患者对护理行为的主观看法。目的:在西班牙住院患者中评估WCPS仪器的有效性和可靠性。使用Rasch方法进行了分析,以测试该工具在不同条件和人群中的稳健性。方法:采用验证研究评估WCPS工具的文化适应性、信度和效度。获得了伦理批准,并获得了使用该仪器的授权。选择Rasch方法,因为它提供了一个强大的和理论上接地的方法来仪器验证。结果:整体内容效度指数为0.80。第一组Cronbach’s α为0.84,第二组为0.86。因子分析提取出单个因子,解释能力为65%。适当拟合项的Rasch信度为0.88。结论:西班牙语版的WCPS已得到验证,是衡量明爱在医院的超个人关系的有用工具,促进以人为本的护理。然而,Rasch模型验证强调了进一步改进的需要,包括增加更多的问题来解决测量差距和折叠类别以减少单维结构下的数据可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信