Carmen George, Brianna John, Robert Alsburg, Renaldo Fowler, Malyssa Egge, Sharon Sandman, Rachel Whitman, Cameron Curley, Hendrik de Heer, Craig Manning, Caleigh Curley, Gloria Begay, Del Yazzie, Simental Francisco, Sonya Shin
{"title":"Community-Based Intervention to Promote Awareness and Implementation Accuracy of Food and Beverage Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation.","authors":"Carmen George, Brianna John, Robert Alsburg, Renaldo Fowler, Malyssa Egge, Sharon Sandman, Rachel Whitman, Cameron Curley, Hendrik de Heer, Craig Manning, Caleigh Curley, Gloria Begay, Del Yazzie, Simental Francisco, Sonya Shin","doi":"10.1177/15248399251357619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251357619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251357619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Unhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.
Methods: Stores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.
Results: Overall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach.
Discussion: Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.