Cost-benefit analysis of the quarantine policy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus in Iran.

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Morteza Tahamipour Zarandi, Kimia Haghbandeh
{"title":"Cost-benefit analysis of the quarantine policy during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus in Iran.","authors":"Morteza Tahamipour Zarandi, Kimia Haghbandeh","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00626-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outbreak of COVID-19 posed significant health and economic challenges worldwide, prompting governments to implement various containment measures, including quarantine policies. This study examines the cost-benefit analysis of Iran's quarantine policy during the pandemic, evaluating its economic impact, public health outcomes, and overall effectiveness. The research explores the direct and indirect costs of quarantine, including reduced economic activity, government expenditures, and social consequences, while assessing the benefits in terms of lives saved, healthcare system relief, and long-term economic stability. Findings suggest that while quarantine measures imposed substantial financial burdens, they played a crucial role in controlling the virus's spread and preventing a greater economic and human toll. The study highlights the necessity of balancing public health interventions with economic sustainability, offering insights for future pandemic response strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study has used the cost-benefit analysis method. In the financial evaluation, benefits such as the reduction of fuel costs, gratuitous payments, and the benefit of credits paid to employees have been compared to expenses such as the average cost of corona treatment in the hospital and at home for the population of employees who have contracted the disease. Also, in the economic evaluation, the benefits of reducing electricity costs and food for employees, the willingness of people to pay the government for protective measures, and reducing overtime payments to employees compared to costs such as food for hospitalized employees, paying subsidies to employees and reducing GDP Has been studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Application of quarantine is optimal from the view of government employees (financial point of view) with a benefit-cost ratio of 1.98, and the government's point of view (economic point of view) is cost-effective with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.68.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that applying quarantine for employees benefits both the people and the government. Thus, the results of this study can be a guide for policymakers in managing similar disasters or the spread of other strains of the Coronavirus in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00626-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 posed significant health and economic challenges worldwide, prompting governments to implement various containment measures, including quarantine policies. This study examines the cost-benefit analysis of Iran's quarantine policy during the pandemic, evaluating its economic impact, public health outcomes, and overall effectiveness. The research explores the direct and indirect costs of quarantine, including reduced economic activity, government expenditures, and social consequences, while assessing the benefits in terms of lives saved, healthcare system relief, and long-term economic stability. Findings suggest that while quarantine measures imposed substantial financial burdens, they played a crucial role in controlling the virus's spread and preventing a greater economic and human toll. The study highlights the necessity of balancing public health interventions with economic sustainability, offering insights for future pandemic response strategies.

Methods: This study has used the cost-benefit analysis method. In the financial evaluation, benefits such as the reduction of fuel costs, gratuitous payments, and the benefit of credits paid to employees have been compared to expenses such as the average cost of corona treatment in the hospital and at home for the population of employees who have contracted the disease. Also, in the economic evaluation, the benefits of reducing electricity costs and food for employees, the willingness of people to pay the government for protective measures, and reducing overtime payments to employees compared to costs such as food for hospitalized employees, paying subsidies to employees and reducing GDP Has been studied.

Results: Application of quarantine is optimal from the view of government employees (financial point of view) with a benefit-cost ratio of 1.98, and the government's point of view (economic point of view) is cost-effective with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.68.

Conclusions: These results indicate that applying quarantine for employees benefits both the people and the government. Thus, the results of this study can be a guide for policymakers in managing similar disasters or the spread of other strains of the Coronavirus in the future.

Abstract Image

伊朗新冠肺炎疫情期间隔离政策的成本效益分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病的爆发给全球带来了重大的卫生和经济挑战,促使各国政府实施各种遏制措施,包括隔离政策。本研究考察了疫情期间伊朗隔离政策的成本效益分析,评估了其经济影响、公共卫生结果和总体有效性。该研究探讨了隔离的直接和间接成本,包括减少经济活动、政府支出和社会后果,同时评估了拯救生命、医疗系统救济和长期经济稳定方面的好处。调查结果表明,虽然隔离措施造成了巨大的财政负担,但它们在控制病毒传播和防止更大的经济和人员伤亡方面发挥了关键作用。该研究强调了平衡公共卫生干预与经济可持续性的必要性,为未来的大流行应对战略提供了见解。方法:本研究采用成本效益分析法。在财务评价中,将减少燃料费用、无偿付款和支付给雇员的抵免福利等福利与感染该疾病的雇员在医院和家中接受冠状病毒治疗的平均费用等费用进行了比较。此外,在经济评价中,研究了降低员工的电费和食品成本的效益,人们向政府支付保护措施的意愿,以及减少员工的加班费,而不是住院员工的食品,向员工支付补贴和减少GDP等成本。结果:从政府雇员的角度(财务角度)来看,实施隔离是最优的,其效益成本比为1.98;从政府的角度(经济角度)来看,其效益成本比为2.68。结论:本研究结果表明,对员工实行隔离对人民和政府都有利。因此,这项研究的结果可以为政策制定者在未来管理类似灾难或其他冠状病毒株的传播提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信