[Effectiveness of anatomical major nail implant guide in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation].

Q4 Medicine
Yu-Xin Yang, Shun-Li Xu, Xin Wang, Cheng-Qi Zhang, Kai Guan
{"title":"[Effectiveness of anatomical major nail implant guide in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation].","authors":"Yu-Xin Yang, Shun-Li Xu, Xin Wang, Cheng-Qi Zhang, Kai Guan","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the application effect of self-developed anatomical main nail insertion guide in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (IFF) in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 62 patients with AO31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures who underwent PFNA surgery and met the inclusion criteria from January 2022 to December 2024. They were divided into the conventional PFNA insertion group (conventional operation group) and the anatomical main nail insertion guide-assisted PFNA insertion group(guide group). The conventional operation group (PFNA) included 31 patients, 14 males and 17 females, the age ranged from 64 to 90 with an average of (75.2±11.6) years old;the guide group (PFNA) included 31 patients, 10 males and 21 females, the age ranged fron 67 to 97 with an average of (78.6±13.4) years old. The incision length of the main nail entry, the number of fluoroscopies from satisfactory reduction to before main nail insertion, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, 3-day postoperative VAS score, postoperative hip function Harris score, complications, etc. were observed and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were followed up for a period ranging from 4 to 12 months, with an average follow-up duration of (6.8±1.6) months. Compared with the guide group, the conventional operation group showed significant differences in the following parameters:the entrance length of the main screw was (6.74±3.77) cm vs. (5.13±1.31) cm, the number of fluoroscopies before the insertion of the main screw was (10.32±3.08) times vs. (7.71±2.41) times, the operation time was (150.45±53.47) minutes vs. (127.48±30.37) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was (196.77±121.06) ml vs. (140.97±86.00) ml, with <i>P</i><0.05 indicating statistical significance.There was no statistically significant difference in 3-day postoperative VAS between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Harris scores between the conventional operation group and the guided operation group one month post-surgery (60.61±6.60) vs. (65.48±5.19) points (<i>P</i><0.05). and there was no statistically significant difference in hip Harris scores between the two groups at 3 months after operation (<i>P</i>>0.05). During the 3-month follow-up after operation, neither group had incision infection, screw loosening, cutting, pressure sores, deep vein thrombosis, etc., and there was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is quickly and accurately to implant PFNA assisted by the anatomical major nail implant guide in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.Compared with the traditional operation, it can shorten the operation time and reduce the surgical and X-ray trauma, and beneficial to the rapid rehabilitation of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 7","pages":"668-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the application effect of self-developed anatomical main nail insertion guide in proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) internal fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (IFF) in elderly patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 62 patients with AO31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures who underwent PFNA surgery and met the inclusion criteria from January 2022 to December 2024. They were divided into the conventional PFNA insertion group (conventional operation group) and the anatomical main nail insertion guide-assisted PFNA insertion group(guide group). The conventional operation group (PFNA) included 31 patients, 14 males and 17 females, the age ranged from 64 to 90 with an average of (75.2±11.6) years old;the guide group (PFNA) included 31 patients, 10 males and 21 females, the age ranged fron 67 to 97 with an average of (78.6±13.4) years old. The incision length of the main nail entry, the number of fluoroscopies from satisfactory reduction to before main nail insertion, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, 3-day postoperative VAS score, postoperative hip function Harris score, complications, etc. were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results: All patients were followed up for a period ranging from 4 to 12 months, with an average follow-up duration of (6.8±1.6) months. Compared with the guide group, the conventional operation group showed significant differences in the following parameters:the entrance length of the main screw was (6.74±3.77) cm vs. (5.13±1.31) cm, the number of fluoroscopies before the insertion of the main screw was (10.32±3.08) times vs. (7.71±2.41) times, the operation time was (150.45±53.47) minutes vs. (127.48±30.37) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was (196.77±121.06) ml vs. (140.97±86.00) ml, with P<0.05 indicating statistical significance.There was no statistically significant difference in 3-day postoperative VAS between the two groups (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Harris scores between the conventional operation group and the guided operation group one month post-surgery (60.61±6.60) vs. (65.48±5.19) points (P<0.05). and there was no statistically significant difference in hip Harris scores between the two groups at 3 months after operation (P>0.05). During the 3-month follow-up after operation, neither group had incision infection, screw loosening, cutting, pressure sores, deep vein thrombosis, etc., and there was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups.

Conclusion: It is quickly and accurately to implant PFNA assisted by the anatomical major nail implant guide in treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.Compared with the traditional operation, it can shorten the operation time and reduce the surgical and X-ray trauma, and beneficial to the rapid rehabilitation of patients.

[解剖型主钉植入导钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折伴股骨近端钉反旋的疗效]。
目的:探讨自行研制的解剖型主钉导钉在股骨近端防旋转内固定(PFNA)治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年12月期间,62例AO31-A2粗隆间骨折患者行PFNA手术,符合纳入标准。分为常规PFNA插入组(常规手术组)和解剖主钉插入引导下辅助PFNA插入组(引导组)。常规手术组(PFNA) 31例,男14例,女17例,年龄64 ~ 90岁,平均(75.2±11.6)岁;引导组(PFNA) 31例,男10例,女21例,年龄67 ~ 97岁,平均(78.6±13.4)岁。观察并比较两组患者主钉入路切口长度、复位满意至主钉入前透视次数、手术时间、术中出血量、术后3 d VAS评分、术后髋关节功能Harris评分、并发症等情况。结果:所有患者均获得4 ~ 12个月的随访,平均随访时间(6.8±1.6)个月。与导引组比较,常规手术组主螺钉入路长度分别为(6.74±3.77)cm和(5.13±1.31)cm,主螺钉入路前透视次数分别为(10.32±3.08)次和(7.71±2.41)次,手术时间分别为(150.45±53.47)分钟和(127.48±30.37)分钟,术中出血量分别为(196.77±121.06)ml和(140.97±86.00)ml, p < 0.05)。常规手术组与引导手术组术后1个月Harris评分(60.61±6.60)分与(65.48±5.19)分比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术后随访3个月,两组均未发生切口感染、螺钉松动、切割、压疮、深静脉血栓形成等情况,两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:在解剖主钉引导下植入PFNA治疗老年骨质疏松性粗隆间骨折快速、准确。与传统手术相比,可缩短手术时间,减少手术及x线创伤,有利于患者快速康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信