Xiaoyu Tang, Jiling Gu, Sa Lu, Jiaying Sun, Yanyan Du
{"title":"From Sound to Sight: The Cross-Modal Spread of Location-Based Inhibition of Return.","authors":"Xiaoyu Tang, Jiling Gu, Sa Lu, Jiaying Sun, Yanyan Du","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that visual selective attention can spread cross-modally to the task-irrelevant auditory modality. In the present study, we investigated whether location- and frequency-based inhibition of return (IOR) can extend from the auditory modality to the task-irrelevant visual modality using an exogenous cue-target paradigm coupled with electrophysiological recordings. The auditory cue was presented on the left or right speaker, and the auditory target, which appeared 300-500 ms after the cue, was presented at the same or different locations and frequencies. Visual stimuli presented either individually or simultaneously at the center of the screen were disregarded. The results revealed that the frontocentral late component (200-350 ms) in the extracted visual ERP difference waveforms (audiovisual minus auditory) was stronger at different cue-target locations than at the same locations, regardless of whether the cue-target frequency was the same or different. However, no significant differences were observed in the late component between cue-target same and different frequency conditions. These findings provide strong evidence that location-based IORs can spread cross-modally, whereas frequency-based IORs appear to remain modality specific. This pattern highlights the selective nature of auditory-to-visual attentional transfer, which is mediated by shared spatial representations and limited by feature-specific processing pathways. The current study provides a new perspective for understanding how auditory and visual modalities interact in attention processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 8","pages":"e70123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that visual selective attention can spread cross-modally to the task-irrelevant auditory modality. In the present study, we investigated whether location- and frequency-based inhibition of return (IOR) can extend from the auditory modality to the task-irrelevant visual modality using an exogenous cue-target paradigm coupled with electrophysiological recordings. The auditory cue was presented on the left or right speaker, and the auditory target, which appeared 300-500 ms after the cue, was presented at the same or different locations and frequencies. Visual stimuli presented either individually or simultaneously at the center of the screen were disregarded. The results revealed that the frontocentral late component (200-350 ms) in the extracted visual ERP difference waveforms (audiovisual minus auditory) was stronger at different cue-target locations than at the same locations, regardless of whether the cue-target frequency was the same or different. However, no significant differences were observed in the late component between cue-target same and different frequency conditions. These findings provide strong evidence that location-based IORs can spread cross-modally, whereas frequency-based IORs appear to remain modality specific. This pattern highlights the selective nature of auditory-to-visual attentional transfer, which is mediated by shared spatial representations and limited by feature-specific processing pathways. The current study provides a new perspective for understanding how auditory and visual modalities interact in attention processing.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.