Effects of an Interpersonal Counseling Intervention on Interdependence of Symptoms in Cancer Survivor-Informal Caregiver Dyads.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chris Segrin, Terry A Badger, Nathan Cunicelli, Alla Sikorskii
{"title":"Effects of an Interpersonal Counseling Intervention on Interdependence of Symptoms in Cancer Survivor-Informal Caregiver Dyads.","authors":"Chris Segrin, Terry A Badger, Nathan Cunicelli, Alla Sikorskii","doi":"10.1002/pon.70250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer survivors and their caregivers can experience interdependent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this research was to determine if participation in a telephone delivered interpersonal counseling intervention, compared to an educational intervention, increases observed dyadic interdependence in depression, anxiety, and other symptoms in cancer survivors and their informal caregivers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A dyadic sample of survivors in treatment for solid tumor cancers and their caregivers participated in a 17-week sequential multiple assignment trial of symptom management interventions. Participants completed weekly measures of depression, anxiety, and other symptoms. Initially, all survivors and caregivers received a Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) intervention. Survivors who still had unresolved depression or anxiety symptoms after 4 weeks were randomized with their caregivers to continue with SMSH alone or add a telephone interpersonal counseling (TIPC) intervention for the next 8 weeks (N = 87). For this sample, the lagged-dependent Actor-Partner Interdependence Model was used to estimate longitudinal actor and partner effects for each of the three symptom measures. Interaction terms representing intervention condition (SMSH vs. SMSH + TIPC) were entered into the models to determine if intervention moderated the observed actor or partner effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The caregiver→survivor partner effect for anxiety was significantly stronger in the SMSH + TIP arm compared to the SMSH alone arm. No other moderation effects were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participating in the interpersonal counseling intervention as an addition to an educational intervention delivered to both members of a survivor-caregiver dyad does not appear to affect dyadic interdependence in symptoms other than anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors and their caregivers can experience interdependent symptoms.

Aims: The objective of this research was to determine if participation in a telephone delivered interpersonal counseling intervention, compared to an educational intervention, increases observed dyadic interdependence in depression, anxiety, and other symptoms in cancer survivors and their informal caregivers.

Method: A dyadic sample of survivors in treatment for solid tumor cancers and their caregivers participated in a 17-week sequential multiple assignment trial of symptom management interventions. Participants completed weekly measures of depression, anxiety, and other symptoms. Initially, all survivors and caregivers received a Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) intervention. Survivors who still had unresolved depression or anxiety symptoms after 4 weeks were randomized with their caregivers to continue with SMSH alone or add a telephone interpersonal counseling (TIPC) intervention for the next 8 weeks (N = 87). For this sample, the lagged-dependent Actor-Partner Interdependence Model was used to estimate longitudinal actor and partner effects for each of the three symptom measures. Interaction terms representing intervention condition (SMSH vs. SMSH + TIPC) were entered into the models to determine if intervention moderated the observed actor or partner effects.

Results: The caregiver→survivor partner effect for anxiety was significantly stronger in the SMSH + TIP arm compared to the SMSH alone arm. No other moderation effects were observed.

Conclusions: Participating in the interpersonal counseling intervention as an addition to an educational intervention delivered to both members of a survivor-caregiver dyad does not appear to affect dyadic interdependence in symptoms other than anxiety.

人际咨询干预对癌症幸存者-非正式照顾者二人组症状相互依赖的影响。
背景:癌症幸存者和他们的照顾者可以经历相互依存的症状。目的:本研究的目的是确定与教育干预相比,参与电话传递的人际咨询干预是否会增加癌症幸存者及其非正式照顾者在抑郁、焦虑和其他症状方面观察到的二元相互依赖。方法:两组接受实体肿瘤治疗的幸存者及其护理人员参加了一项为期17周的症状管理干预的顺序多重分配试验。参与者每周完成抑郁、焦虑和其他症状的测量。最初,所有幸存者和照顾者都接受了症状管理和幸存者手册(SMSH)干预。4周后仍有未解决的抑郁或焦虑症状的幸存者与其照顾者随机分组,在接下来的8周内继续单独使用SMSH或增加电话人际咨询(TIPC)干预(N = 87)。对于这个样本,滞后依赖的参与者-伴侣相互依赖模型被用来估计纵向参与者和伴侣对三个症状测量的影响。代表干预条件的相互作用项(SMSH vs. SMSH + TIPC)被输入到模型中,以确定干预是否会调节观察到的行动者或伴侣效应。结果:照顾者→幸存者伴侣对焦虑的影响在SMSH + TIP组中显著强于单独使用SMSH组。没有观察到其他的调节作用。结论:参与人际咨询干预,作为对幸存者-照顾者二联体成员的教育干预的补充,似乎不会影响除焦虑以外的双联体症状的相互依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信