Decoding prescriptions: A closer look at common errors in clinical practice across community pharmacies of Northern Cyprus.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Syed Sikandar Shah, Aftab Alam, Ashfaq Ahmad Shah Bukhari, Jamil Ahmed, Johana Haindongo
{"title":"Decoding prescriptions: A closer look at common errors in clinical practice across community pharmacies of Northern Cyprus.","authors":"Syed Sikandar Shah, Aftab Alam, Ashfaq Ahmad Shah Bukhari, Jamil Ahmed, Johana Haindongo","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.4.REG.14103.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescription documentation is essential for patient safety and medication efficacy. However, incomplete or illegible prescriptions can lead to errors, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the completeness, clarity and quality of handwritten and electronic prescriptions from community pharmacies in Northern Cyprus, assessing compliance with WHO guidelines. A total of 5,246 prescriptions from 23 pharmacies were analyzed over nine months, with 4,856 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 77% were handwritten and 23% electronic. Illegibility was an issue in 23.1% of handwritten prescriptions, increasing the risk of errors. Generic drug names were included in only 11.42% of handwritten and 26.95% of electronic prescriptions, reducing clarity. Potential DDIs were identified in 52.2% of cases, particularly involving anticoagulants and NSAIDs. Additionally, 3.9% of prescriptions showed evidence of DDIs. Antibiotics (28.03%) and analgesics (22.66%) were the most prescribed medications. While electronic prescriptions improved legibility, both formats lacked essential details. The study highlights the need for improved prescription practices, advocating for mandatory electronic prescribing, enhanced prescriber education and clinical decision support systems to reduce errors, improve patient safety and enhance prescription quality in community pharmacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 4","pages":"1195-1202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.4.REG.14103.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prescription documentation is essential for patient safety and medication efficacy. However, incomplete or illegible prescriptions can lead to errors, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This study evaluated the completeness, clarity and quality of handwritten and electronic prescriptions from community pharmacies in Northern Cyprus, assessing compliance with WHO guidelines. A total of 5,246 prescriptions from 23 pharmacies were analyzed over nine months, with 4,856 meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 77% were handwritten and 23% electronic. Illegibility was an issue in 23.1% of handwritten prescriptions, increasing the risk of errors. Generic drug names were included in only 11.42% of handwritten and 26.95% of electronic prescriptions, reducing clarity. Potential DDIs were identified in 52.2% of cases, particularly involving anticoagulants and NSAIDs. Additionally, 3.9% of prescriptions showed evidence of DDIs. Antibiotics (28.03%) and analgesics (22.66%) were the most prescribed medications. While electronic prescriptions improved legibility, both formats lacked essential details. The study highlights the need for improved prescription practices, advocating for mandatory electronic prescribing, enhanced prescriber education and clinical decision support systems to reduce errors, improve patient safety and enhance prescription quality in community pharmacies.

解码处方:仔细观察北塞浦路斯社区药房临床实践中的常见错误。
处方文件对患者安全和药物疗效至关重要。然而,不完整或难以辨认的处方可能导致错误,包括药物相互作用(ddi)。本研究评估了北塞浦路斯社区药房手写和电子处方的完整性、清晰度和质量,评估了对世卫组织指南的遵守情况。9个月内共分析23家药店5246张处方,其中4856张符合纳入标准。其中,77%是手写的,23%是电子的。23.1%的手写处方存在字迹不清的问题,这增加了出错的风险。仅11.42%的手写处方和26.95%的电子处方包含仿制药名称,降低了清晰度。在52.2%的病例中发现了潜在的ddi,特别是涉及抗凝血剂和非甾体抗炎药。此外,3.9%的处方显示有ddi的证据。抗生素(28.03%)和镇痛药(22.66%)是处方最多的药物。虽然电子处方提高了易读性,但两种格式都缺乏必要的细节。该研究强调需要改进处方做法,倡导强制性电子处方,加强处方者教育和临床决策支持系统,以减少错误,改善患者安全并提高社区药房的处方质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信