Clinical Evaluation of Umifenovir as a Potential Antiviral Therapy for COVID-19: A Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Q2 Medicine
Oman Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5001/omj.2025.51
Parisa Kianpour, Reza Mourtami, Sajad Sahab-Negah, Yunes Panahi, Behnam Bayatani, Ali Qazivini, Morteza Izadi, Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Bita Shahrami, Azar Hadadi, Mahnaz Montazeri, Negin Bagher, Farhad Najmeddin
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of Umifenovir as a Potential Antiviral Therapy for COVID-19: A Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Parisa Kianpour, Reza Mourtami, Sajad Sahab-Negah, Yunes Panahi, Behnam Bayatani, Ali Qazivini, Morteza Izadi, Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Bita Shahrami, Azar Hadadi, Mahnaz Montazeri, Negin Bagher, Farhad Najmeddin","doi":"10.5001/omj.2025.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of umifenovir as a potential antiviral therapy for COVID-19; specifically, to determine whether umifenovir improves clinical outcomes, reduces hospitalization duration, and enhances recovery rates in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to standard care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 260 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either umifenovir (200 mg every six hours for seven days) or standard care. The primary outcome was clinical improvement, assessed via the National Early Warning Score 2 system, while secondary outcomes included changes in computed tomography scan scores, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission rates, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 260 patients enrolled, 193 completed the study. Both groups showed significant reductions in clinical symptoms, although myalgia was more prevalent in the umifenovir group. The intervention group demonstrated a significant decrease in computed tomography scan scores; however, no significant differences were observed between groups regarding in hospital stay duration, intensive care unit admissions, or mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While umifenovir exhibited some immunological benefits in COVID-19 patients, it did not significantly improve broader patient-important outcomes compared to standard care. Therefore, its routine use in clinical practice for COVID-19 treatment is currently not justified, highlighting the need for further research to explore alternative therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19667,"journal":{"name":"Oman Medical Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"e716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oman Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2025.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of umifenovir as a potential antiviral therapy for COVID-19; specifically, to determine whether umifenovir improves clinical outcomes, reduces hospitalization duration, and enhances recovery rates in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to standard care.

Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 260 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either umifenovir (200 mg every six hours for seven days) or standard care. The primary outcome was clinical improvement, assessed via the National Early Warning Score 2 system, while secondary outcomes included changes in computed tomography scan scores, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission rates, and mortality.

Results: Of the 260 patients enrolled, 193 completed the study. Both groups showed significant reductions in clinical symptoms, although myalgia was more prevalent in the umifenovir group. The intervention group demonstrated a significant decrease in computed tomography scan scores; however, no significant differences were observed between groups regarding in hospital stay duration, intensive care unit admissions, or mortality rates.

Conclusions: While umifenovir exhibited some immunological benefits in COVID-19 patients, it did not significantly improve broader patient-important outcomes compared to standard care. Therefore, its routine use in clinical practice for COVID-19 treatment is currently not justified, highlighting the need for further research to explore alternative therapeutic strategies.

乌米诺韦作为新型冠状病毒潜在抗病毒治疗药物的临床评价:一项多中心、随机、对照临床试验
目的:评价乌米诺韦作为新型冠状病毒感染抗病毒药物的疗效和安全性;具体而言,确定与标准治疗相比,乌米诺韦是否改善了诊断为COVID-19的患者的临床结果,缩短了住院时间,并提高了康复率。方法:在这项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验中,260例被诊断为COVID-19的患者被随机分配接受乌米诺韦(每6小时200 mg,持续7天)或标准治疗。主要结果是临床改善,通过国家预警评分2系统评估,而次要结果包括计算机断层扫描评分、住院时间、重症监护病房入院率和死亡率的变化。结果:在260名入组患者中,193名完成了研究。两组临床症状均显著减轻,但乌米诺韦组肌痛更为普遍。干预组显示计算机断层扫描评分显著下降;然而,在住院时间、重症监护病房入院率或死亡率方面,两组间没有观察到显著差异。结论:虽然乌米诺韦在COVID-19患者中显示出一些免疫益处,但与标准治疗相比,它并没有显著改善更广泛的患者重要结果。因此,目前在临床实践中常规使用其治疗COVID-19是不合理的,突出表明需要进一步研究以探索替代治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oman Medical Journal
Oman Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信