Evidence for Brain-To-Gut and Gut-To-Brain Pathways in Primary Care Patients With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
N A Koloski, M P Jones, A Shah, G Holtmann, N J Talley
{"title":"Evidence for Brain-To-Gut and Gut-To-Brain Pathways in Primary Care Patients With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.","authors":"N A Koloski, M P Jones, A Shah, G Holtmann, N J Talley","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apart from disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), little data exist on the magnitude of the brain-to-gut pathway in other chronic gastrointestinal conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and what factors modify order of diagnosis. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients who received a diagnosis of a DGBI, GERD, or IBD prior to a new psychological diagnosis (gut-to-brain), and vice versa (brain-to-gut), and whether specific factors moderate the order of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data was collected from a retrospective study of 1,129,104 patients attending general practices in the United Kingdom. Patients diagnosed with DGBI, GERD, or IBD and a psychological disorder (anxiety and/or depression) were included (excluding those with other organic GI disease). Information on which diagnosis appeared first was recorded. Multiple logistic regression was performed to compare a diagnosis of a DGBI, GERD, or IBD first versus a psychological diagnosis first on sociodemographic factors, medical conditions, and medication usage.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Just over half of patients were diagnosed with a psychological condition first versus after for IBS (53.9%) and ulcerative colitis (55.6%). This proportion was higher for FD (61.5%) and GERD (64.2%) but lower for Crohn's disease (45.7%). In a multivariate model, being female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.25, 1.49), prior PPI (OR = 9.17, 95% CI 8.4, 10.0), antibiotic (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 2.29, 2.81) and NSAID use (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.18, 1.42), and prior gastroenteritis (OR = 2.19, 95% CI, 1.79, 2.67) were significant predictors for being diagnosed with GERD first. Similar results were found for DGBI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & inferences: </strong>Prior medication usage and gastroenteritis may play a role in generating gut-to-brain pathway disturbances.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Apart from disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), little data exist on the magnitude of the brain-to-gut pathway in other chronic gastrointestinal conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and what factors modify order of diagnosis. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients who received a diagnosis of a DGBI, GERD, or IBD prior to a new psychological diagnosis (gut-to-brain), and vice versa (brain-to-gut), and whether specific factors moderate the order of diagnosis.

Method: Data was collected from a retrospective study of 1,129,104 patients attending general practices in the United Kingdom. Patients diagnosed with DGBI, GERD, or IBD and a psychological disorder (anxiety and/or depression) were included (excluding those with other organic GI disease). Information on which diagnosis appeared first was recorded. Multiple logistic regression was performed to compare a diagnosis of a DGBI, GERD, or IBD first versus a psychological diagnosis first on sociodemographic factors, medical conditions, and medication usage.

Key results: Just over half of patients were diagnosed with a psychological condition first versus after for IBS (53.9%) and ulcerative colitis (55.6%). This proportion was higher for FD (61.5%) and GERD (64.2%) but lower for Crohn's disease (45.7%). In a multivariate model, being female (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.25, 1.49), prior PPI (OR = 9.17, 95% CI 8.4, 10.0), antibiotic (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 2.29, 2.81) and NSAID use (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.18, 1.42), and prior gastroenteritis (OR = 2.19, 95% CI, 1.79, 2.67) were significant predictors for being diagnosed with GERD first. Similar results were found for DGBI.

Conclusions & inferences: Prior medication usage and gastroenteritis may play a role in generating gut-to-brain pathway disturbances.

肠-脑相互作用紊乱、炎症性肠病和胃食管反流病的初级保健患者脑-肠和肠-脑通路的证据
背景:除了肠-脑相互作用疾病(DGBI)外,关于其他慢性胃肠道疾病如胃食管反流病(GERD)或炎症性肠病(IBD)中脑-肠通路的大小以及哪些因素改变了诊断顺序的数据很少。我们的目的是确定在新的心理诊断(肠-脑)之前接受DGBI、GERD或IBD诊断的患者比例,反之亦然(脑-肠),以及特定因素是否会调节诊断顺序。方法:数据收集自英国1129104名全科患者的回顾性研究。被诊断为DGBI、GERD或IBD和心理障碍(焦虑和/或抑郁)的患者被纳入(不包括其他器质性胃肠道疾病的患者)。记录最先出现诊断的信息。采用多元逻辑回归比较DGBI、GERD或IBD的诊断与首先在社会人口因素、医疗条件和药物使用方面的心理诊断。主要结果:超过一半的患者首先被诊断出患有心理疾病,而IBS(53.9%)和溃疡性结肠炎(55.6%)之后被诊断出患有心理疾病。FD(61.5%)和GERD(64.2%)的比例较高,但克罗恩病(45.7%)的比例较低。在多变量模型中,女性(OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.25, 1.49)、既往PPI (OR = 9.17, 95% CI 8.4, 10.0)、抗生素(OR = 2.54, 95% CI 2.29, 2.81)和既往非甾体抗炎药(OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.18, 1.42)和既往胃肠炎(OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.79, 2.67)是首次诊断为胃食管反流的重要预测因素。DGBI也有类似的结果。结论与推论:既往用药和胃肠炎可能在肠-脑通路紊乱中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信