Documenting the subjective patient experience of first versus second eye during immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Carmen Balian, Jack E Teplitsky, Wissam Nassrallah, Aman Sayal, Rosa Braga-Mele, Sherif El-Defrawy, Amrit S Rai, John Lloyd, Amandeep S Rai
{"title":"Documenting the subjective patient experience of first versus second eye during immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.","authors":"Carmen Balian, Jack E Teplitsky, Wissam Nassrallah, Aman Sayal, Rosa Braga-Mele, Sherif El-Defrawy, Amrit S Rai, John Lloyd, Amandeep S Rai","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery patients tend to have subjectively inferior experiences during the second eye surgery than the first eye surgery. Our study investigated if this phenomenon would still occur during immediate sequential bilateral cataract (ISBCS) as both operations are performed within the same surgical visit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>To investigate this, we enrolled patients undergoing ISBCS at a multi-surgeon ophthalmic surgical center into our study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Our study used a survey-based prospective design to measure the experience of these patients with ISBCS. The first eye which underwent surgery was randomized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients of the center undergoing routine cataract surgery who enrolled in the study completed a questionnaire immediately after surgery to describe their surgical experience for each eye. Survey questions measured patient pain, discomfort or pressure, comfort, relaxation, estimated length of surgery and predicted visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient reported level of pain during the second eye surgery was significantly greater than for the first eye (p<0.001). Furthermore, the order of surgery was found to be a strong predictor of patient reported pain (p<0.001), more so than surgical length (p<0.008), additional anesthesia (p<0.35), patient age (p<0.44) or patient sex (p<0.88). Overall, surgery during the first eye was reported as more comfortable (p<0.001) and shorter in duration (p<0.001) while discomfort and pressure were reported as worse for the second eye (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding differential experiences between eyes can help surgeons when counselling patients regarding expectations for ISBCS and related visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: During delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery patients tend to have subjectively inferior experiences during the second eye surgery than the first eye surgery. Our study investigated if this phenomenon would still occur during immediate sequential bilateral cataract (ISBCS) as both operations are performed within the same surgical visit.

Setting: To investigate this, we enrolled patients undergoing ISBCS at a multi-surgeon ophthalmic surgical center into our study.

Design: Our study used a survey-based prospective design to measure the experience of these patients with ISBCS. The first eye which underwent surgery was randomized.

Methods: Patients of the center undergoing routine cataract surgery who enrolled in the study completed a questionnaire immediately after surgery to describe their surgical experience for each eye. Survey questions measured patient pain, discomfort or pressure, comfort, relaxation, estimated length of surgery and predicted visual outcome.

Results: Patient reported level of pain during the second eye surgery was significantly greater than for the first eye (p<0.001). Furthermore, the order of surgery was found to be a strong predictor of patient reported pain (p<0.001), more so than surgical length (p<0.008), additional anesthesia (p<0.35), patient age (p<0.44) or patient sex (p<0.88). Overall, surgery during the first eye was reported as more comfortable (p<0.001) and shorter in duration (p<0.001) while discomfort and pressure were reported as worse for the second eye (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Understanding differential experiences between eyes can help surgeons when counselling patients regarding expectations for ISBCS and related visual outcomes.

记录即时序贯双侧白内障手术中第一眼与第二眼患者的主观体验。
目的:延迟序贯双侧白内障手术患者在第二次眼手术时主观体验较第一次眼手术差。我们的研究调查了当两种手术在同一次手术中进行时,这种现象是否仍然会发生。背景:为了研究这一点,我们招募了在多外科医生眼科手术中心接受ISBCS的患者加入我们的研究。设计:我们的研究采用基于调查的前瞻性设计来测量这些ISBCS患者的体验。第一只接受手术的眼睛是随机的。方法:该中心接受常规白内障手术的患者在手术后立即完成一份问卷,描述他们每只眼睛的手术经历。调查问题测量了患者的疼痛、不适或压力、舒适、放松、估计手术时间和预测视力结果。结果:患者在第二眼手术中报告的疼痛程度明显大于第一只眼(结论:了解两眼之间的差异体验可以帮助外科医生在咨询患者对ISBCS的期望和相关视力结果时提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信