Comparing the Quality of Patient Guidance on Dermatologic Care Generated by ChatGPT vs Reddit.

IF 2.7 4区医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY

Cutis Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.12788/cutis.1222

Shaliz Aflatooni, Carson Bair, Emily Coughlin, Zoe Lipman, Alison H Kucharik, Sharon Albers

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online resources that are convenient and affordable play a crucial role in mitigating health inequality and improving patient access to health care information. In this study, we aimed to assess and compare the quality of patient guidance on dermatologic care generated by ChatGPT vs Reddit. Dermatologists should be aware of the potential risks associated with patients obtaining medical advice from online sources and be prepared to caution and educate patients on how to use them effectively.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较ChatGPT与Reddit生成的皮肤科护理患者指导质量。

方便和负担得起的在线资源在减轻卫生不平等和改善患者获得卫生保健信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在这项研究中，我们的目的是评估和比较ChatGPT和Reddit产生的皮肤病护理患者指导的质量。皮肤科医生应该意识到患者从网上获取医疗建议的潜在风险，并准备好提醒和教育患者如何有效地使用它们。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cutis 医学-皮肤病学

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

191

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Published since 1965, Cutis is a peer-reviewed clinical journal for the dermatologist, allergist, and general practitioner. The journal is published monthly and focuses on concise clinical articles that present the practical side of dermatology. Referenced in Index Medicus/MEDLINE, it is respected and enjoyed by both specialists and derm-active generalists, enabling its readers to get what they need quickly and efficiently. Furthermore, Cutis is read by more physicians actively involved in the day-to-day treatment of dermatologic conditions than any other dermatology publication. Covering a broad range of pertinent and timely topics, Cutis is written and edited by industry leaders. For information on article submissions, please see our Information for Authors.