Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi
{"title":"Automated classification of skeletal malocclusion in German orthodontic patients.","authors":"Eva Paddenberg-Schubert, Kareem Midlej, Sebastian Krohn, Erika Kuchler, Nezar Watted, Peter Proff, Fuad A Iraqi","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 8","pages":"396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12325434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06485-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Precisely diagnosing skeletal class is mandatory for correct orthodontic treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could increase efficiency during diagnostics and contribute to automated workflows. So far, no AI-driven process can differentiate between skeletal classes I, II, and III in German orthodontic patients. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to develop machine- and deep-learning models for diagnosing their skeletal class based on the gold-standard individualised ANB of Panagiotidis and Witt.
Materials and methods: Orthodontic patients treated in Germany contributed to the study population. Pre-treatment cephalometric parameters, sex, and age served as input variables. Machine-learning models performed were linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naïve Bayes (NB), and multi class logistic regression (MCLR). Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) was conducted.
Results: 1277 German patients presented skeletal class I (48.79%), II (27.56%) and III (23.64%). The best machine-learning model, which considered all input parameters, was RF with 100% accuracy, with Calculated_ANB being the most important (0.429). The model with Calculated_ANB only achieved 100% accuracy (KNN), but ANB alone was inappropriate (71-76% accuracy). The ANN with all parameters and Calculated_ANB achieved 95.31% and 100% validation-accuracy, respectively.
Conclusions: Machine- and deep-learning methods can correctly determine an individual's skeletal class. Calculated_ANB was the most important among all input parameters, which, therefore, requires precise determination.
Clinical relevance: The AI methods introduced may help to establish digital and automated workflows in cephalometric diagnostics, which could contribute to the relief of the orthodontic practitioner.
期刊介绍:
The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.