Fatemeh Alaei, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Abdollah Farzaneh, Payam Nabovati
{"title":"Impaired fusional vergence facility in young adults with dry eye syndrome.","authors":"Fatemeh Alaei, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Abdollah Farzaneh, Payam Nabovati","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2025.2542323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Symptoms associated with dry eye and those related to vergence and accommodative disorders exhibit considerable overlap, suggesting a possible dysfunction in vergence/accommodative performance in individuals with dry eye.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the accommodative and binocular vision performance in young adults with dry eye syndrome compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty individuals with dry eye syndrome and 40 healthy controls were enrolled. Each participant underwent a comprehensive ocular examination including visual acuity measurement, refraction, slit-lamp examination, tear film evaluation, and assessments of accommodative and binocular vision performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 22.70 ± 2.40 years in the dry eye group and 22.51 ± 2.21 years in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.720). Twelve (30%) and thirteen (32.5%) participants in the dry eye and control groups were male, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.550). No statistically significant differences were found in best-corrected visual acuity, sphere, cylinder, or spherical equivalent refraction between the dry eye and control groups (all p-values > 0.05). The median vergence facility in the dry eye group was significantly lower than that of the control group (9 vs. 15 cycles per minute <i>p</i> < 0.001). The analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding other measures, such as distance and near phoria, near point of convergence break and recovery, distance and near positive and negative fusional vergence amplitudes, stereoacuity, and accommodative parameters. Furthermore, a statistically significant negative correlation was identified between the vergence facility and the ocular surface disease index (<i>r</i> = -0.285, <i>p</i> = 0.011), while a significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.288, <i>p</i> = 0.010) was noted between the vergence facility and the tear break-up time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dry eye negatively affects vergence facility in young adults. This vergence dysfunction contributes to the symptoms reported by dry eye patients and shows a significant positive correlation with tear film instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2542323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Symptoms associated with dry eye and those related to vergence and accommodative disorders exhibit considerable overlap, suggesting a possible dysfunction in vergence/accommodative performance in individuals with dry eye.
Background: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the accommodative and binocular vision performance in young adults with dry eye syndrome compared to a control group.
Methods: Forty individuals with dry eye syndrome and 40 healthy controls were enrolled. Each participant underwent a comprehensive ocular examination including visual acuity measurement, refraction, slit-lamp examination, tear film evaluation, and assessments of accommodative and binocular vision performance.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 22.70 ± 2.40 years in the dry eye group and 22.51 ± 2.21 years in the control group (p = 0.720). Twelve (30%) and thirteen (32.5%) participants in the dry eye and control groups were male, respectively (p = 0.550). No statistically significant differences were found in best-corrected visual acuity, sphere, cylinder, or spherical equivalent refraction between the dry eye and control groups (all p-values > 0.05). The median vergence facility in the dry eye group was significantly lower than that of the control group (9 vs. 15 cycles per minute p < 0.001). The analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding other measures, such as distance and near phoria, near point of convergence break and recovery, distance and near positive and negative fusional vergence amplitudes, stereoacuity, and accommodative parameters. Furthermore, a statistically significant negative correlation was identified between the vergence facility and the ocular surface disease index (r = -0.285, p = 0.011), while a significant positive correlation (r = 0.288, p = 0.010) was noted between the vergence facility and the tear break-up time.
Conclusion: Dry eye negatively affects vergence facility in young adults. This vergence dysfunction contributes to the symptoms reported by dry eye patients and shows a significant positive correlation with tear film instability.
临床相关性:与干眼相关的症状和与散度和调节功能障碍相关的症状表现出相当大的重叠,表明干眼患者可能存在散度/调节功能障碍。背景:本横断面研究旨在评估年轻干眼综合征患者与对照组相比的调节视力和双眼视力表现。方法:选取40例干眼综合征患者和40例健康对照者。每位参与者都接受了全面的眼科检查,包括视力测量、屈光、裂隙灯检查、泪膜评估以及调节视力和双眼视力评估。结果:干眼症组平均年龄为22.70±2.40岁,对照组平均年龄为22.51±2.21岁(p = 0.720)。干眼症组和对照组分别有12人(30%)和13人(32.5%)为男性(p = 0.550)。干眼组和对照组在最佳矫正视力、球体、圆柱形或球体等效屈光度方面均无统计学差异(p值均为0.05)。干眼组的中位散点速度显著低于对照组(9 vs 15周期/分钟p r = -0.285, p = 0.011),而散点速度与泪液破裂时间呈显著正相关(r = 0.288, p = 0.010)。结论:干眼症对青壮年的会聚功能有负面影响。这种聚光功能障碍有助于干眼患者报告的症状,并与泪膜不稳定性呈显著正相关。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.