Topical Steroid Withdrawal: A Perspective of Australian Dermatologists.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Andrew Awad, Frances Bell, Gayle Ross
{"title":"Topical Steroid Withdrawal: A Perspective of Australian Dermatologists.","authors":"Andrew Awad, Frances Bell, Gayle Ross","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a rare adverse event from topical corticosteroid use. Recently, there has been increasing interest and discussion in the community regarding TSW; however, there are no diagnostic criteria. Our study aimed to identify Australian dermatologists' perspectives on TSW and provide recommendations for future approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey distributed by the Australasian College of Dermatologists via email to all dermatology fellows and trainees from September to November 2024. Survey questions were informed by literature on TSW, conference materials, expert input and consultation with the Australasian College of Dermatologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were seventy completed survey responses. Most respondents were dermatology fellows, and 60% had a particular interest in atopic dermatitis. Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported that they do not consider TSW a clinical entity. Most respondents (95%) thought the underlying diagnosis was a relapse of atopic dermatitis or periorificial dermatitis (24%). Ninety-seven percent of respondents reported that patients became aware of the term TSW through social media.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey identified differing perspectives on TSW among dermatology fellows and trainees; many do not diagnose it, and most patients gain information via social media. This emphasises the importance of developing a unified stance on TSW from medical professionals to prevent the spread of misleading information from non-medical sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Topical steroid withdrawal (TSW) is a rare adverse event from topical corticosteroid use. Recently, there has been increasing interest and discussion in the community regarding TSW; however, there are no diagnostic criteria. Our study aimed to identify Australian dermatologists' perspectives on TSW and provide recommendations for future approaches.

Methods: We conducted an online survey distributed by the Australasian College of Dermatologists via email to all dermatology fellows and trainees from September to November 2024. Survey questions were informed by literature on TSW, conference materials, expert input and consultation with the Australasian College of Dermatologists.

Results: There were seventy completed survey responses. Most respondents were dermatology fellows, and 60% had a particular interest in atopic dermatitis. Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported that they do not consider TSW a clinical entity. Most respondents (95%) thought the underlying diagnosis was a relapse of atopic dermatitis or periorificial dermatitis (24%). Ninety-seven percent of respondents reported that patients became aware of the term TSW through social media.

Conclusions: Our survey identified differing perspectives on TSW among dermatology fellows and trainees; many do not diagnose it, and most patients gain information via social media. This emphasises the importance of developing a unified stance on TSW from medical professionals to prevent the spread of misleading information from non-medical sources.

局部类固醇戒断:澳大利亚皮肤科医生的观点。
背景:局部类固醇停用(TSW)是局部皮质类固醇使用的罕见不良事件。最近,社会上对天水围的兴趣和讨论越来越多;然而,目前尚无诊断标准。我们的研究旨在确定澳大利亚皮肤科医生对TSW的看法,并为未来的治疗方法提供建议。方法:我们于2024年9月至11月进行了一项由澳大利亚皮肤科学院通过电子邮件向所有皮肤科研究员和实习生分发的在线调查。调查问题由TSW的文献、会议资料、专家意见和与澳大利亚皮肤科医师学院的咨询提供。结果:共收到70份完整的调查问卷。大多数受访者是皮肤科研究员,60%的人对特应性皮炎特别感兴趣。59%的受访者表示,他们不认为TSW是一个临床实体。大多数应答者(95%)认为潜在的诊断是特应性皮炎或周周皮炎的复发(24%)。97%的受访者表示,患者是通过社交媒体了解到TSW这个词的。结论:我们的调查确定了皮肤科研究员和实习生对TSW的不同看法;许多人没有诊断出来,大多数患者通过社交媒体获得信息。这强调了医疗专业人员对TSW形成统一立场的重要性,以防止非医疗来源的误导性信息传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信