Unpacking the Antecedents of Boredom and Its Impact on University Learners’ Engagement in Languages Other Than English: A Qualitative Study in the Distance Online Learning Context

IF 1.7 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xian Zhao, Danping Wang
{"title":"Unpacking the Antecedents of Boredom and Its Impact on University Learners’ Engagement in Languages Other Than English: A Qualitative Study in the Distance Online Learning Context","authors":"Xian Zhao,&nbsp;Danping Wang","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although psychological factors such as emotion and engagement have gained increasing attention for their role in language learning success, a substantial gap remains in understanding the sources of boredom and its impact on learners’ engagement, whether behavioural, affective or cognitive, in languages other than English (LOTE). This study employs questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to examine the cause-and-effect relationships between antecedents, boredom and engagement in a distance online learning context among university Chinese as a second language (CSL) teachers and learners (<i>N</i> = 17) from China. The findings suggest that (1) boredom is primarily a student-oriented construct influenced by physical fatigue and academic regression. Teacher-related factors, such as a slow and predictable teaching pace, dull classroom design, lack of questioning, explanations and untimely feedback, also contribute to boredom, along with learning tasks (e.g., repetitive, mechanical and over-challenging tasks), and internet-related issues. Boredom is notably more present in listening courses rather than in integrated Chinese courses. (2) Boredom primarily affected learners’ behavioural engagement (e.g., distraction, sleepiness, mind-wandering, and task abandonment) and subsequently impaired their cognitive (e.g., concentration, comprehension) and emotional (e.g., anxiety, anger) layers. This study elucidated the intricate interconnections between layers within engagement and beyond, and the interrelationships among a list of factors across conative (engagement, effort and motivation), affective (boredom, anxiety and anger) and cognitive (concentration, comprehension and reasoning) dimensions in a domain-specific and skill-specific manner. In closing, pedagogical implications for both educators and learners are discussed to reduce boredom and enhance learners’ classroom engagement, ultimately improving learning outcomes and the overall language learning experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"35 3","pages":"1121-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijal.12680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although psychological factors such as emotion and engagement have gained increasing attention for their role in language learning success, a substantial gap remains in understanding the sources of boredom and its impact on learners’ engagement, whether behavioural, affective or cognitive, in languages other than English (LOTE). This study employs questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to examine the cause-and-effect relationships between antecedents, boredom and engagement in a distance online learning context among university Chinese as a second language (CSL) teachers and learners (N = 17) from China. The findings suggest that (1) boredom is primarily a student-oriented construct influenced by physical fatigue and academic regression. Teacher-related factors, such as a slow and predictable teaching pace, dull classroom design, lack of questioning, explanations and untimely feedback, also contribute to boredom, along with learning tasks (e.g., repetitive, mechanical and over-challenging tasks), and internet-related issues. Boredom is notably more present in listening courses rather than in integrated Chinese courses. (2) Boredom primarily affected learners’ behavioural engagement (e.g., distraction, sleepiness, mind-wandering, and task abandonment) and subsequently impaired their cognitive (e.g., concentration, comprehension) and emotional (e.g., anxiety, anger) layers. This study elucidated the intricate interconnections between layers within engagement and beyond, and the interrelationships among a list of factors across conative (engagement, effort and motivation), affective (boredom, anxiety and anger) and cognitive (concentration, comprehension and reasoning) dimensions in a domain-specific and skill-specific manner. In closing, pedagogical implications for both educators and learners are discussed to reduce boredom and enhance learners’ classroom engagement, ultimately improving learning outcomes and the overall language learning experience.

Abstract Image

解封无聊的前因及其对大学学习者非英语语言投入的影响:远程在线学习背景下的定性研究
尽管情绪和参与等心理因素在语言学习成功中的作用越来越受到关注,但在理解无聊的来源及其对学习者参与(无论是行为,情感还是认知)的影响方面仍然存在很大差距。本研究采用问卷调查和半结构化访谈的方法,对中国高校汉语教师和学习者(N = 17)在远程在线学习情境下的前因由、厌烦感和投入感之间的因果关系进行了研究。结果表明:(1)厌倦主要是一种学生导向的构念,受身体疲劳和学业回归的影响。与教师相关的因素,如缓慢而可预测的教学节奏、枯燥的课堂设计、缺乏提问、解释和不及时的反馈,以及学习任务(如重复、机械和过度挑战的任务)和与互联网相关的问题,也会导致无聊。无聊现象在听力课程中比在综合汉语课程中更为明显。(2)无聊主要影响学习者的行为投入(如分心、困倦、走神和任务放弃),并随后损害他们的认知(如注意力集中、理解)和情绪(如焦虑、愤怒)层面。本研究以特定领域和特定技能的方式阐明了敬业度内外各层次之间错综复杂的相互联系,以及一系列因素之间的相互关系,这些因素涉及创造性(敬业度、努力和动机)、情感性(无聊、焦虑和愤怒)和认知性(专注、理解和推理)维度。最后,本文讨论了教育工作者和学习者的教学意义,以减少无聊,提高学习者的课堂参与度,最终改善学习成果和整体语言学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信