Bayesian model selection for network discrimination and risk-informed decision-making in material flow analysis

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jiankan Liao, Sidi Deng, Xun Huan, Daniel Cooper
{"title":"Bayesian model selection for network discrimination and risk-informed decision-making in material flow analysis","authors":"Jiankan Liao,&nbsp;Sidi Deng,&nbsp;Xun Huan,&nbsp;Daniel Cooper","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Material flow analyses (MFAs) provide insight into supply chain-level opportunities for resource efficiency. MFAs can be represented as networks with nodes that represent materials, processes, sectors, or locations. MFA network structure uncertainty (i.e., the existence or absence of flows between nodes) is pervasive and can undermine the reliability of the flow predictions. This article investigates MFA network structure uncertainty by proposing candidate node-and-flow structures and using Bayesian model selection to identify the most suitable structures and Bayesian model averaging to quantify the parametric mass flow uncertainty. The results of this holistic approach to MFA uncertainty are used in conjunction with the input-output (I/O) method to make risk-informed resource efficiency recommendations. These techniques are demonstrated using a case study on the US steel sector where 16 candidate structures are considered. The model selection highlights two networks as most probable based on data collected from the United States Geological Survey and the World Steel Association. Using the I/O method, we then show that the construction sector accounts for the greatest mean share of domestic US steel industry emissions while the automotive and steel products sectors have the highest mean emissions per unit of steel used in the end-use sectors. The uncertainty in the results is used to analyze which end-use sector should be the focus of demand reduction efforts under different appetites for risk. This article's methods generate holistic and transparent MFA uncertainty that accounts for structural uncertainty, enabling decisions whose outcomes are more robust to the uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1060-1076"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Material flow analyses (MFAs) provide insight into supply chain-level opportunities for resource efficiency. MFAs can be represented as networks with nodes that represent materials, processes, sectors, or locations. MFA network structure uncertainty (i.e., the existence or absence of flows between nodes) is pervasive and can undermine the reliability of the flow predictions. This article investigates MFA network structure uncertainty by proposing candidate node-and-flow structures and using Bayesian model selection to identify the most suitable structures and Bayesian model averaging to quantify the parametric mass flow uncertainty. The results of this holistic approach to MFA uncertainty are used in conjunction with the input-output (I/O) method to make risk-informed resource efficiency recommendations. These techniques are demonstrated using a case study on the US steel sector where 16 candidate structures are considered. The model selection highlights two networks as most probable based on data collected from the United States Geological Survey and the World Steel Association. Using the I/O method, we then show that the construction sector accounts for the greatest mean share of domestic US steel industry emissions while the automotive and steel products sectors have the highest mean emissions per unit of steel used in the end-use sectors. The uncertainty in the results is used to analyze which end-use sector should be the focus of demand reduction efforts under different appetites for risk. This article's methods generate holistic and transparent MFA uncertainty that accounts for structural uncertainty, enabling decisions whose outcomes are more robust to the uncertainty.

Abstract Image

物流分析中网络判别与风险决策的贝叶斯模型选择
物料流分析(MFAs)为资源效率提供了对供应链层面机会的洞察。mfa可以表示为带有表示材料、过程、部门或位置的节点的网络。MFA网络结构的不确定性(即节点之间存在或不存在流量)是普遍存在的,并且会破坏流量预测的可靠性。本文研究了MFA网络结构的不确定性,提出了候选节点流结构,并使用贝叶斯模型选择来识别最合适的结构,使用贝叶斯模型平均来量化参数质量流的不确定性。这种对MFA不确定性的整体方法的结果与投入产出(I/O)方法结合使用,以提出风险知情的资源效率建议。这些技术通过对美国钢铁行业的案例研究进行了演示,其中考虑了16种候选结构。根据从美国地质调查局和世界钢铁协会收集的数据,模型选择突出了两个最有可能的网络。然后,我们使用I/O方法表明,建筑部门占美国国内钢铁工业排放的平均份额最大,而汽车和钢铁产品部门在最终用途部门使用的每单位钢铁的平均排放量最高。结果的不确定性用于分析在不同的风险偏好下,哪个最终用途部门应该成为减少需求努力的重点。本文的方法产生了整体和透明的MFA不确定性,说明了结构不确定性,使决策的结果对不确定性更加稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信