The stakeholder business case for circular economy: An ordonomic approach for developing a circular economy business case by stakeholder governance

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Felix Carl Schultz, Vladislav Valentinov, Ingo Pies
{"title":"The stakeholder business case for circular economy: An ordonomic approach for developing a circular economy business case by stakeholder governance","authors":"Felix Carl Schultz,&nbsp;Vladislav Valentinov,&nbsp;Ingo Pies","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent circular economy (CE) literature has examined the opportunities and limitations of business case logics, yet this area remains under-theorized. This article contributes to the emerging debate by drawing on the stakeholder business case <i>for</i> sustainability from corporate sustainability literature, emphasizing the role of stakeholder collaboration in addressing sustainability challenges. By adopting the ordonomic approach from business ethics, we (re-)conceptualize the stakeholder business case <i>for</i> CE, focusing on the dynamic interplay between profit motives and stakeholder collaboration. This article makes three key contributions. First, it bridges the gap between theoretical business case logics and CE practices, demonstrating how innovative stakeholder governance can foster incentive- and system-compatible CE integration. Second, it contends that successful CE practices demand a comprehensive, system-level approach that actively involves all stakeholders. It underscores the importance of broad stakeholder engagement in business case development and illustrates how such collaboration harmonizes individual and collective interests within a CE. Third, it expands the stakeholder business case <i>for</i> sustainability by introducing a conceptual distinction between stakeholders’ semantics, governance, and optimization. This distinction offers new opportunities to reconcile profit orientation with environmental stewardship, advancing the societal transition to a functional CE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1279-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent circular economy (CE) literature has examined the opportunities and limitations of business case logics, yet this area remains under-theorized. This article contributes to the emerging debate by drawing on the stakeholder business case for sustainability from corporate sustainability literature, emphasizing the role of stakeholder collaboration in addressing sustainability challenges. By adopting the ordonomic approach from business ethics, we (re-)conceptualize the stakeholder business case for CE, focusing on the dynamic interplay between profit motives and stakeholder collaboration. This article makes three key contributions. First, it bridges the gap between theoretical business case logics and CE practices, demonstrating how innovative stakeholder governance can foster incentive- and system-compatible CE integration. Second, it contends that successful CE practices demand a comprehensive, system-level approach that actively involves all stakeholders. It underscores the importance of broad stakeholder engagement in business case development and illustrates how such collaboration harmonizes individual and collective interests within a CE. Third, it expands the stakeholder business case for sustainability by introducing a conceptual distinction between stakeholders’ semantics, governance, and optimization. This distinction offers new opportunities to reconcile profit orientation with environmental stewardship, advancing the societal transition to a functional CE.

Abstract Image

循环经济的利益相关者商业案例:通过利益相关者治理开发循环经济商业案例的一种有序方法
最近的循环经济(CE)文献研究了商业案例逻辑的机会和局限性,但这一领域的理论仍然不足。本文通过从企业可持续发展文献中借鉴利益相关者的可持续发展商业案例,强调利益相关者合作在应对可持续发展挑战中的作用,为新兴的辩论做出了贡献。通过采用商业伦理的常规方法,我们(重新)概念化了CE的利益相关者商业案例,重点关注利润动机和利益相关者合作之间的动态相互作用。本文做出了三个关键贡献。首先,它弥合了理论商业案例逻辑和CE实践之间的差距,展示了创新的利益相关者治理如何促进激励和系统兼容的CE集成。其次,它认为成功的环境行政实践需要一个全面的、系统级的方法,积极地涉及所有利益相关者。它强调了在业务案例开发中广泛涉众参与的重要性,并说明了这种协作如何协调CE内的个人和集体利益。第三,通过引入利益相关者语义、治理和优化之间的概念区别,扩展了利益相关者的可持续性业务案例。这种区别为调和利润导向与环境管理之间的关系提供了新的机会,推动了社会向功能性CE的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信