Drying Kinetics and Quality Evaluation of Mace Under Solar, Vacuum, and Hot-Air Drying Methods

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
P. V. Alfiya, E. Jayashree, K. Anees, K. Sunisha
{"title":"Drying Kinetics and Quality Evaluation of Mace Under Solar, Vacuum, and Hot-Air Drying Methods","authors":"P. V. Alfiya,&nbsp;E. Jayashree,&nbsp;K. Anees,&nbsp;K. Sunisha","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explored the impact of different drying methods namely solar-biomass, vacuum, and hot-air drying, on the drying characteristics, essential oil, oleoresin, and lycopene contents of mace. The research highlighted the importance of optimizing drying techniques to preserve the quality and bioactive compounds of mace, a valuable spice derived from nutmeg. Work compared drying efficiency and quality retention across the three drying methods. Experimental setup utilized a solar-biomass hybrid dryer with supplementary heating, alongside vacuum and hot-air dryers at temperatures of 45°C, 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C. The methodology involved measuring moisture reduction from an initial 55%–60% to a final 7%–8%, with vacuum drying achieving this in 4 h, hot-air drying in 6 h, and solar-biomass drying requiring 18 h. The drying process exhibited a falling rate period, with vacuum and hot-air drying reaching a maximum drying rate of 1.06 g/g dry mass·h, compared to 0.97 g/g dry mass·h for solar-biomass drying. Results revealed that vacuum-dried mace at 60°C yielded the highest essential oil (7.92%) and oleoresin (19.55%) contents, while hot-air-dried mace at 55°C had the lowest essential oil (7.63%) and oleoresin (18.44%). Solar-biomass-dried mace showed intermediate values (7.82% essential oil, 19.06% oleoresin). Lycopene content was highest in vacuum-dried mace (153.47 μg/mL), followed by hot-air (145.71 μg/mL) and solar-biomass (144.54 μg/mL) dried samples, indicating the superiority of vacuum drying in preserving bioactive compounds.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the impact of different drying methods namely solar-biomass, vacuum, and hot-air drying, on the drying characteristics, essential oil, oleoresin, and lycopene contents of mace. The research highlighted the importance of optimizing drying techniques to preserve the quality and bioactive compounds of mace, a valuable spice derived from nutmeg. Work compared drying efficiency and quality retention across the three drying methods. Experimental setup utilized a solar-biomass hybrid dryer with supplementary heating, alongside vacuum and hot-air dryers at temperatures of 45°C, 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C. The methodology involved measuring moisture reduction from an initial 55%–60% to a final 7%–8%, with vacuum drying achieving this in 4 h, hot-air drying in 6 h, and solar-biomass drying requiring 18 h. The drying process exhibited a falling rate period, with vacuum and hot-air drying reaching a maximum drying rate of 1.06 g/g dry mass·h, compared to 0.97 g/g dry mass·h for solar-biomass drying. Results revealed that vacuum-dried mace at 60°C yielded the highest essential oil (7.92%) and oleoresin (19.55%) contents, while hot-air-dried mace at 55°C had the lowest essential oil (7.63%) and oleoresin (18.44%). Solar-biomass-dried mace showed intermediate values (7.82% essential oil, 19.06% oleoresin). Lycopene content was highest in vacuum-dried mace (153.47 μg/mL), followed by hot-air (145.71 μg/mL) and solar-biomass (144.54 μg/mL) dried samples, indicating the superiority of vacuum drying in preserving bioactive compounds.

梅斯在太阳能、真空和热风干燥下的干燥动力学和质量评价
本研究探讨了太阳能-生物质干燥、真空干燥和热风干燥等不同干燥方式对梅果干燥特性、精油、油树脂和番茄红素含量的影响。该研究强调了优化干燥技术的重要性,以保持肉豆蔻的质量和生物活性化合物,肉豆蔻是一种从肉豆蔻中提取的有价值的香料。工作比较了三种干燥方法的干燥效率和质量保持。实验装置使用了太阳能-生物质混合干燥机,并配有辅助加热,以及真空和热风干燥机,温度分别为45°C、50°C、55°C和60°C。该方法包括测量水分从最初的55%-60%减少到最终的7%-8%,真空干燥在4小时内实现,热风干燥在6小时内实现,太阳能生物质干燥需要18小时。干燥过程呈现下降速率期,真空和热风干燥的最大干燥速率为1.06 g/g干质量·h,而太阳能-生物质干燥的最大干燥速率为0.97 g/g干质量·h。结果表明,60℃真空干燥肉豆蔻精油和油树脂含量最高(7.92%),油树脂含量最高(19.55%),55℃热风干燥肉豆蔻精油和油树脂含量最低(7.63%),油树脂含量最低(18.44%)。太阳-生物质干燥豆粕为中间值(7.82%精油,19.06%油树脂)。真空干燥的番茄红素含量最高(153.47 μg/mL),其次是热风干燥(145.71 μg/mL)和太阳能-生物质干燥(144.54 μg/mL),说明真空干燥在保存活性物质方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信