Exploring paths toward enabling transitions: Systems thinking-based approach and its application to shifts toward sustainable circulation of materials in transportation infrastructure

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sara Malmgren, Rajib Sinha
{"title":"Exploring paths toward enabling transitions: Systems thinking-based approach and its application to shifts toward sustainable circulation of materials in transportation infrastructure","authors":"Sara Malmgren,&nbsp;Rajib Sinha","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Operationalizing sustainability transitions is associated with, for example, complexity-related challenges. This article describes an approach designed to facilitate handling such challenges, including compilation of the different perspectives of actors and facilitating analysis of interactions between interventions, in a manner suitable for integration of results in policy development contexts. Building on systems thinking and understanding of transitions, it is designed to support dialogue on (i) problems motivating policy interventions to enable a desired shift, (ii) priority areas for interventions, (iii) possible paths toward enabling transitions including interactions between priority areas for interventions, as well as (iv) chains of reasoning for policy interventions. The approach was piloted to explore how shifts toward sustainable circulation of materials in Swedish transportation infrastructure could be enabled. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect actors’ assumptions on system failures as well as drivers and possible interventions, supported by the system failures framework of Weber and Rohracher. Seven priority areas for interventions were suggested. A causal loop diagram as well as a simplified version here referred to as “transition logics” were then prepared and used to explore paths toward enabling the desired shift, including possible near-term priorities considering interactions between suggested priority areas for interventions. The causal loop diagram was also used as a basis to develop a chain of reasoning for policy interventions. Results shall be seen as a basis for further dialogue and analysis. Finally, possibilities for further development of the approach are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1310-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operationalizing sustainability transitions is associated with, for example, complexity-related challenges. This article describes an approach designed to facilitate handling such challenges, including compilation of the different perspectives of actors and facilitating analysis of interactions between interventions, in a manner suitable for integration of results in policy development contexts. Building on systems thinking and understanding of transitions, it is designed to support dialogue on (i) problems motivating policy interventions to enable a desired shift, (ii) priority areas for interventions, (iii) possible paths toward enabling transitions including interactions between priority areas for interventions, as well as (iv) chains of reasoning for policy interventions. The approach was piloted to explore how shifts toward sustainable circulation of materials in Swedish transportation infrastructure could be enabled. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect actors’ assumptions on system failures as well as drivers and possible interventions, supported by the system failures framework of Weber and Rohracher. Seven priority areas for interventions were suggested. A causal loop diagram as well as a simplified version here referred to as “transition logics” were then prepared and used to explore paths toward enabling the desired shift, including possible near-term priorities considering interactions between suggested priority areas for interventions. The causal loop diagram was also used as a basis to develop a chain of reasoning for policy interventions. Results shall be seen as a basis for further dialogue and analysis. Finally, possibilities for further development of the approach are also discussed.

Abstract Image

探索实现转型的路径:基于系统思维的方法及其在交通基础设施中向可持续循环材料转变的应用
例如,可持续性转型的实施与复杂性相关的挑战有关。本文描述了一种旨在促进应对此类挑战的方法,包括以适合于在政策制定背景下整合结果的方式汇编行为者的不同观点,并促进对干预措施之间相互作用的分析。它建立在对转型的系统思考和理解的基础上,旨在支持以下方面的对话:(i)激励政策干预的问题,以实现预期的转变;(ii)干预的优先领域;(iii)实现转型的可能途径,包括干预的优先领域之间的相互作用;以及(iv)政策干预的推理链。该方法的试点是为了探索如何在瑞典交通基础设施中实现材料的可持续流通。在Weber和Rohracher的系统失效框架的支持下,采用半结构化访谈收集行为者对系统失效的假设、驱动因素和可能的干预措施。建议了七个优先干预领域。然后准备了因果循环图以及这里称为“过渡逻辑”的简化版本,并用于探索实现所需转变的途径,包括考虑到建议的优先干预领域之间的相互作用的可能的近期优先事项。因果循环图也被用作制定政策干预推理链的基础。结果应被视为进一步对话和分析的基础。最后,讨论了该方法进一步发展的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信