{"title":"Wing base morphology supports paraphyly of Papilionoidea s.s. (Lepidoptera)","authors":"Kohei Sakai, Masaya Yago, Kazunori Yoshizawa","doi":"10.1111/ens.12609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditionally, skippers (Hesperiidae) and moth-like butterflies (Hedylidae) were classified in separate superfamilies outside the butterfly superfamily Papilionoidea <i>sensu stricto</i>. However, recent molecular phylogenies including phylogenomics placed the swallowtails (family Papilionidae) as the sister group to all other butterflies, including skippers and moth-like butterflies, making the traditionally recognized Papilionoidea <i>s.s.</i> paraphyletic. However, no morphological studies have supported this relationship to date. Here, we conducted a cladistic analysis based on wing base characters to evaluate these competing systematic hypotheses. Our results support a sister-group relationship between skippers and moth-like butterflies and their inclusion within Papilionoidea <i>sensu lato</i>, consistent with molecular-based phylogenies. In contrast, the wing base morphology suggests the monophyly of Pieridae + Riodinidae + Lycaenidae, a result that contradicts both molecular and other morphological evidence, highlighting the potential limitations of this character system. Based on our morphological examinations and ancestral state reconstruction, we propose a hypothetical ground plan for the butterfly wing base.</p>","PeriodicalId":11745,"journal":{"name":"Entomological Science","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomological Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ens.12609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditionally, skippers (Hesperiidae) and moth-like butterflies (Hedylidae) were classified in separate superfamilies outside the butterfly superfamily Papilionoidea sensu stricto. However, recent molecular phylogenies including phylogenomics placed the swallowtails (family Papilionidae) as the sister group to all other butterflies, including skippers and moth-like butterflies, making the traditionally recognized Papilionoidea s.s. paraphyletic. However, no morphological studies have supported this relationship to date. Here, we conducted a cladistic analysis based on wing base characters to evaluate these competing systematic hypotheses. Our results support a sister-group relationship between skippers and moth-like butterflies and their inclusion within Papilionoidea sensu lato, consistent with molecular-based phylogenies. In contrast, the wing base morphology suggests the monophyly of Pieridae + Riodinidae + Lycaenidae, a result that contradicts both molecular and other morphological evidence, highlighting the potential limitations of this character system. Based on our morphological examinations and ancestral state reconstruction, we propose a hypothetical ground plan for the butterfly wing base.
传统上,跳蝶科和蛾状蝶科被划分为蝴蝶超科之外的两个不同的超科。然而,最近的分子系统发育,包括系统基因组学,将燕尾(凤蝶科)作为所有其他蝴蝶(包括跳蝶和蛾状蝴蝶)的姐妹群,使传统上公认的凤蝶科s.s.成为paraphyletic。然而,迄今为止还没有形态学研究支持这种关系。在此,我们基于翼基特征进行了分支分析,以评估这些相互竞争的系统假设。我们的研究结果支持跳蝶和蛾状蝴蝶之间的姐妹群关系,以及它们在Papilionoidea sensu lato中的包含,与基于分子的系统发育一致。相比之下,翼基形态学表明蝶科+飞蛾科+ Lycaenidae是单一的,这一结果与分子和其他形态学证据相矛盾,突出了该特征系统的潜在局限性。在形态学检查和祖先状态重建的基础上,我们提出了一个假设的蝴蝶翼基平面图。
期刊介绍:
Entomological Science is the official English language journal of the Entomological Society of Japan. The Journal publishes original research papers and reviews from any entomological discipline or from directly allied field in ecology, behavioral biology, physiology, biochemistry, development, genetics, systematics, morphology, evolution and general entomology. Papers of applied entomology will be considered for publication if they significantly advance in the field of entomological science in the opinion of the Editors and Editorial Board.