Exploring the Relationship Between Interpreting Students’ Online Strategy Use and Instructors’ Recommendations: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study

IF 1.7 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yinghui Li, Hengbin Yan
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Interpreting Students’ Online Strategy Use and Instructors’ Recommendations: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Yinghui Li,&nbsp;Hengbin Yan","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Online strategies, used during the interpreting process, are crucial for interpreting performance and constitute an important component of interpreter education, yet little is known about whether students use these strategies as recommended by instructors. This study tracked the use of online strategies by 53 first-year interpreting students in consecutive interpreting from L2 to L1 over one academic year and compared their use to recommendations provided by 30 instructors. While students’ strategy use at neither the beginning nor the end of the year correlated significantly with instructors’ recommendations, the recommendations significantly explained changes in students’ strategy use over time. To explore other factors shaping students’ strategy use, we first examined the relationship between their strategy use and L2 proficiency to isolate the influence of general language proficiency. Upon finding significant correlations, we conducted interviews with the relatively L2-proficient students. The interviews identified four cognitive factors (e.g., context comprehension and utilization, rendition efficiency, coordination between note-taking and source language comprehension), two affective factors (i.e., interpreting anxiety, learning motivation), and two external factors (e.g., rating criteria) that influenced students’ strategy selection and use frequency. These findings indicate the need for strategy instruction that extends beyond prescriptive recommendations to incorporate individual cognitive-affective factors and external variables.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"35 3","pages":"1525-1536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online strategies, used during the interpreting process, are crucial for interpreting performance and constitute an important component of interpreter education, yet little is known about whether students use these strategies as recommended by instructors. This study tracked the use of online strategies by 53 first-year interpreting students in consecutive interpreting from L2 to L1 over one academic year and compared their use to recommendations provided by 30 instructors. While students’ strategy use at neither the beginning nor the end of the year correlated significantly with instructors’ recommendations, the recommendations significantly explained changes in students’ strategy use over time. To explore other factors shaping students’ strategy use, we first examined the relationship between their strategy use and L2 proficiency to isolate the influence of general language proficiency. Upon finding significant correlations, we conducted interviews with the relatively L2-proficient students. The interviews identified four cognitive factors (e.g., context comprehension and utilization, rendition efficiency, coordination between note-taking and source language comprehension), two affective factors (i.e., interpreting anxiety, learning motivation), and two external factors (e.g., rating criteria) that influenced students’ strategy selection and use frequency. These findings indicate the need for strategy instruction that extends beyond prescriptive recommendations to incorporate individual cognitive-affective factors and external variables.

探究学生在线策略使用与教师推荐之间的关系:一项纵向、混合方法研究
在口译过程中使用的在线策略对口译表现至关重要,是口译教育的重要组成部分,但学生是否按照教师的建议使用这些策略却知之甚少。本研究追踪了53名一年级口译学生在一学年期间从L2到L1交替口译中使用在线策略的情况,并将他们的使用情况与30名教师提供的建议进行了比较。虽然学生在年初和年底的策略使用与教师的建议都没有显著相关,但这些建议显著地解释了学生策略使用随时间的变化。为了探索影响学生策略使用的其他因素,我们首先考察了他们的策略使用与第二语言熟练程度之间的关系,以隔离一般语言熟练程度的影响。在发现显著相关性后,我们对l2相对熟练的学生进行了访谈。访谈发现影响学生策略选择和使用频率的四个认知因素(如语境理解与利用、翻译效率、笔记与源语理解的协调性)、两个情感因素(如口译焦虑、学习动机)和两个外部因素(如评分标准)。这些发现表明,需要策略指导,超越规定性建议,纳入个人认知情感因素和外部变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信