Material and energy use in Norway's residential building archetypes

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sara Amini, Lola S. A. Rousseau, Edgar G. Hertwich
{"title":"Material and energy use in Norway's residential building archetypes","authors":"Sara Amini,&nbsp;Lola S. A. Rousseau,&nbsp;Edgar G. Hertwich","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Buildings require substantial amounts of resources, as both construction materials and operational energy. In Norway, as buildings become more energy efficient due to advancements in construction, technology, and stricter regulations, the relative impact of construction and maintenance materials rises. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on construction and material use, and consequently, their embodied emissions. While some studies explored the environmental impacts of Norwegian buildings, they often either focus on case-study buildings or only the operational emissions, due to limited data on embodied emissions; others rely on inconsistent statistical correlations between energy use and material composition. Bottom-up physics-based building archetypes offer a solution to fill this gap by providing structured data on energy use and material composition. This paper, therefore, introduces 21 archetypes of Norwegian residential buildings, categorized into three typologies and seven construction cohorts. Dynamic energy simulations were conducted, using DesignBuilder, for estimating space heating consumption, combined with the BuildME Python package for material estimation and aggregation. We found that load-bearing components drive building's material intensity, especially in wooden buildings with basements. Post-1991 multi-family houses (MFHs) have lower material intensity than single-family houses (SFHs) and apartment blocks (ABs), though ABs outperform them by lower space heating demand. Substitution of concrete slabs by wood and increasing occupancy to MFH's level can reduce the material intensity of ABs and SFHs, respectively. By establishing integrated energy and material demand models, archetypes provide a representative and scalable basis for further assessment of building stock's resource use, renovation impacts, and environmental studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 4","pages":"1121-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buildings require substantial amounts of resources, as both construction materials and operational energy. In Norway, as buildings become more energy efficient due to advancements in construction, technology, and stricter regulations, the relative impact of construction and maintenance materials rises. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on construction and material use, and consequently, their embodied emissions. While some studies explored the environmental impacts of Norwegian buildings, they often either focus on case-study buildings or only the operational emissions, due to limited data on embodied emissions; others rely on inconsistent statistical correlations between energy use and material composition. Bottom-up physics-based building archetypes offer a solution to fill this gap by providing structured data on energy use and material composition. This paper, therefore, introduces 21 archetypes of Norwegian residential buildings, categorized into three typologies and seven construction cohorts. Dynamic energy simulations were conducted, using DesignBuilder, for estimating space heating consumption, combined with the BuildME Python package for material estimation and aggregation. We found that load-bearing components drive building's material intensity, especially in wooden buildings with basements. Post-1991 multi-family houses (MFHs) have lower material intensity than single-family houses (SFHs) and apartment blocks (ABs), though ABs outperform them by lower space heating demand. Substitution of concrete slabs by wood and increasing occupancy to MFH's level can reduce the material intensity of ABs and SFHs, respectively. By establishing integrated energy and material demand models, archetypes provide a representative and scalable basis for further assessment of building stock's resource use, renovation impacts, and environmental studies.

挪威住宅建筑原型的材料和能源使用
建筑物需要大量的资源,如建筑材料和运行能源。在挪威,由于建筑、技术和更严格的法规的进步,建筑变得更加节能,建筑和维护材料的相对影响也在上升。然而,缺乏关于建筑和材料使用的全面数据,因此也缺乏它们的实际排放量。虽然一些研究探讨了挪威建筑对环境的影响,但由于具体排放的数据有限,它们通常要么关注案例研究建筑,要么只关注运营排放;另一些则依赖于能源使用和材料组成之间不一致的统计相关性。自下而上的基于物理的建筑原型提供了一种解决方案,通过提供关于能源使用和材料组成的结构化数据来填补这一空白。因此,本文介绍了挪威住宅建筑的21个原型,分为三种类型和七个施工队列。使用DesignBuilder进行动态能量模拟,以估计空间供暖消耗,并结合BuildME Python包进行材料估计和汇总。我们发现承重构件驱动建筑的材料强度,特别是在有地下室的木制建筑中。1991年后的多户住宅(MFHs)的材料强度低于单户住宅(SFHs)和公寓楼(ABs),尽管ABs在空间采暖需求方面优于它们。用木材替代混凝土板和将占用率提高到MFH水平可以分别降低ABs和SFHs的材料强度。通过建立综合的能源和材料需求模型,原型为进一步评估建筑存量的资源利用、改造影响和环境研究提供了一个具有代表性和可扩展的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信