Lexical richness in young English learners’ writing: A focus on opinion and listen-write task types

IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hakyung Sung , Mikyung Kim Wolf , Michael Suhan , Kristopher Kyle
{"title":"Lexical richness in young English learners’ writing: A focus on opinion and listen-write task types","authors":"Hakyung Sung ,&nbsp;Mikyung Kim Wolf ,&nbsp;Michael Suhan ,&nbsp;Kristopher Kyle","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ample research has examined the linguistic characteristics of second language (L2) writing across proficiency scores, with a focus on lexical diversity, sophistication, and density as key dimensions of lexical richness. However, the applicability of these indices to young L2 learners’ writings, often characterized by limited vocabulary and constrained output in standardized writing tasks, remained underexplored. To address this gap, this study analyzed the lexical richness of young L2 learners’ written productions from two TOEFL Junior Writing tasks (Opinion and Listen-Write tasks), using 37 tailored indices of lexical diversity, sophistication, and density. The results indicated that the lexical characteristics of young L2 learners vary by task score and task type, particularly when assessed through indices such as lexical diversity (e.g., moving-average type-token ratio) and sophistication (e.g., n-gram strength of association). Nonetheless, incorporating additional measures, such as syntactic complexity or discourse features, may be essential for distinguishing young L2 learners at higher proficiency levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100975"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000625","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ample research has examined the linguistic characteristics of second language (L2) writing across proficiency scores, with a focus on lexical diversity, sophistication, and density as key dimensions of lexical richness. However, the applicability of these indices to young L2 learners’ writings, often characterized by limited vocabulary and constrained output in standardized writing tasks, remained underexplored. To address this gap, this study analyzed the lexical richness of young L2 learners’ written productions from two TOEFL Junior Writing tasks (Opinion and Listen-Write tasks), using 37 tailored indices of lexical diversity, sophistication, and density. The results indicated that the lexical characteristics of young L2 learners vary by task score and task type, particularly when assessed through indices such as lexical diversity (e.g., moving-average type-token ratio) and sophistication (e.g., n-gram strength of association). Nonetheless, incorporating additional measures, such as syntactic complexity or discourse features, may be essential for distinguishing young L2 learners at higher proficiency levels.
青年英语学习者写作中的词汇丰富性:对观点和听写任务类型的关注
大量研究考察了第二语言写作的语言特征,并将词汇多样性、复杂性和密度作为词汇丰富性的关键维度。然而,这些指标在年轻的二语学习者的写作中的适用性仍未得到充分的探讨,这些写作通常以词汇量有限和标准化写作任务中输出受限为特征。为了解决这一差距,本研究使用37个定制的词汇多样性、复杂性和密度指标,分析了年轻二语学习者在两个托福初级写作任务(Opinion和Listen-Write任务)中书面作品的词汇丰富性。结果表明,年轻二语学习者的词汇特征因任务得分和任务类型而异,特别是通过词汇多样性(如移动平均类型-表征比)和复杂程度(如n-gram联想强度)等指标进行评估时。尽管如此,结合其他措施,如句法复杂性或话语特征,对于区分高熟练程度的年轻二语学习者可能是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信