Measuring understandability of intelligent systems: Scale development and validation across three domains

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Youyu Sheng , Yaoqin Gu , Jianqin Cao , Yuhan Liu , Xiaoyu Wang , Jiani Chen , Xianghong Sun , Jingyu Zhang
{"title":"Measuring understandability of intelligent systems: Scale development and validation across three domains","authors":"Youyu Sheng ,&nbsp;Yaoqin Gu ,&nbsp;Jianqin Cao ,&nbsp;Yuhan Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jiani Chen ,&nbsp;Xianghong Sun ,&nbsp;Jingyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While modern intelligent systems using black-box algorithms have proved their usefulness in many areas, whether the systems’ decisions and intentions can be fully understood by human users is still a critical question. However, the measurement of system understandability is lacking, and it undermines the development of this direction. To fill in such a gap, we conducted three studies to construct a scale to measure the understandability in three intelligent systems. In Study 1, we developed the original scale items through document analysis and expert interviews. In Study 2, we exposed 307 participants to autonomous vehicle systems which provided different amounts of information in simulated takeover scenarios. The participants’ responses towards these systems were collected using the developed scale. Exploratory factors analysis found 4 factors (Explanation Comprehensiveness, Trustworthiness Calibration, Cognitive Accessibility, and Explanation Necessity), and they had significant correlation with important attitudinal behavioral outcomes including trust, usage intention, and satisfaction. In Study 3, we further validated the structural and criterion-related validity of the scale using a new sample of 347 participants interacting with medical and financial decision support systems. The results indicate that the developed scale is a reliable and effective tool for assessing understandability in different intelligent systems, with potential to significantly enhance the design of intelligent systems to be more user-friendly and comprehensible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 103592"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581925001491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While modern intelligent systems using black-box algorithms have proved their usefulness in many areas, whether the systems’ decisions and intentions can be fully understood by human users is still a critical question. However, the measurement of system understandability is lacking, and it undermines the development of this direction. To fill in such a gap, we conducted three studies to construct a scale to measure the understandability in three intelligent systems. In Study 1, we developed the original scale items through document analysis and expert interviews. In Study 2, we exposed 307 participants to autonomous vehicle systems which provided different amounts of information in simulated takeover scenarios. The participants’ responses towards these systems were collected using the developed scale. Exploratory factors analysis found 4 factors (Explanation Comprehensiveness, Trustworthiness Calibration, Cognitive Accessibility, and Explanation Necessity), and they had significant correlation with important attitudinal behavioral outcomes including trust, usage intention, and satisfaction. In Study 3, we further validated the structural and criterion-related validity of the scale using a new sample of 347 participants interacting with medical and financial decision support systems. The results indicate that the developed scale is a reliable and effective tool for assessing understandability in different intelligent systems, with potential to significantly enhance the design of intelligent systems to be more user-friendly and comprehensible.
测量智能系统的可理解性:跨三个领域的规模开发和验证
虽然使用黑盒算法的现代智能系统已经在许多领域证明了它们的有用性,但系统的决策和意图能否被人类用户完全理解仍然是一个关键问题。然而,缺乏对系统可理解性的度量,阻碍了这一方向的发展。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了三项研究,构建了一个衡量三个智能系统可理解性的尺度。在研究1中,我们通过文献分析和专家访谈开发了原始量表条目。在研究2中,我们让307名参与者接触自动驾驶汽车系统,这些系统在模拟接管场景中提供了不同数量的信息。使用开发的量表收集参与者对这些系统的反应。探索性因素分析发现,解释全面性、可信度校准、认知可及性和解释必要性4个因素与信任、使用意向和满意度等重要态度行为结果显著相关。在研究3中,我们使用347名参与者与医疗和金融决策支持系统互动的新样本进一步验证了量表的结构和标准相关效度。结果表明,开发的量表是评估不同智能系统可理解性的可靠有效工具,具有显著提高智能系统设计的易用性和可理解性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信