Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of diesel oil and zero-emission trucks: Systematic review of status and perspectives

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Gaia Gentilucci, Antonella Accardo, Ezio Spessa
{"title":"Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of diesel oil and zero-emission trucks: Systematic review of status and perspectives","authors":"Gaia Gentilucci,&nbsp;Antonella Accardo,&nbsp;Ezio Spessa","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transport sector is a major source of greenhouse emissions, requiring urgent action for transition to cleaner alternatives. In this context, Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) are essential for decarbonizing the transport sector and reducing air pollution. To estimate the potential benefits and burdens of these novel powertrains, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology can be used and offer a comprehensive approach. However, when comparing ZEVs to diesel Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs), it is crucial to rely on robust results to ensure comparability. The present study presents a systematic literature review of LCA applications to Heavy-Duty Vehicles (HDVs), employing a rigorous methodology to provide an unbiased and comprehensive overview. The study aims to: (1) investigate the state-of-the-art methodological approaches in LCA implementation to HDVs (i.e., qualitative assessment) and (2) quantify the carbon footprints of current ICE-HDVs and ZEVs (i.e., quantitative assessment). After a screening step, a sample of 24 publications, comprising both scientific articles and industrial reports, has been extracted from several databases. Quantitatively, the analysis highlights a significant variability of the carbon footprint results, ranging between 431–1780 tons CO<sub>2</sub>eq for diesel ICEVs, 175–1626 tons CO<sub>2</sub>eq for battery electric vehicles, 366–2944 tons CO<sub>2</sub>eq for fuel cell electric vehicles. Instead, from the qualitative standpoint, the review reveals that, while quite consensus exists on the functional unit, there are still major differing methodological choices that cause significant variability of carbon footprint among studies. Also, the analysis highlights the strong need for improved primary data coverage and greater harmonization of LCA methods and assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transport sector is a major source of greenhouse emissions, requiring urgent action for transition to cleaner alternatives. In this context, Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) are essential for decarbonizing the transport sector and reducing air pollution. To estimate the potential benefits and burdens of these novel powertrains, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology can be used and offer a comprehensive approach. However, when comparing ZEVs to diesel Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs), it is crucial to rely on robust results to ensure comparability. The present study presents a systematic literature review of LCA applications to Heavy-Duty Vehicles (HDVs), employing a rigorous methodology to provide an unbiased and comprehensive overview. The study aims to: (1) investigate the state-of-the-art methodological approaches in LCA implementation to HDVs (i.e., qualitative assessment) and (2) quantify the carbon footprints of current ICE-HDVs and ZEVs (i.e., quantitative assessment). After a screening step, a sample of 24 publications, comprising both scientific articles and industrial reports, has been extracted from several databases. Quantitatively, the analysis highlights a significant variability of the carbon footprint results, ranging between 431–1780 tons CO2eq for diesel ICEVs, 175–1626 tons CO2eq for battery electric vehicles, 366–2944 tons CO2eq for fuel cell electric vehicles. Instead, from the qualitative standpoint, the review reveals that, while quite consensus exists on the functional unit, there are still major differing methodological choices that cause significant variability of carbon footprint among studies. Also, the analysis highlights the strong need for improved primary data coverage and greater harmonization of LCA methods and assumptions.
柴油和零排放卡车的生命周期温室气体排放:现状和前景的系统回顾
交通运输部门是温室气体排放的主要来源,需要采取紧急行动,向更清洁的替代能源过渡。在这种情况下,零排放车辆(zev)对于运输部门脱碳和减少空气污染至关重要。为了评估这些新型动力系统的潜在效益和负担,可以使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,并提供一个全面的方法。然而,当将zev与柴油内燃机车(icev)进行比较时,关键是要依靠可靠的结果来确保可比性。本研究对LCA在重型车辆(hdv)上的应用进行了系统的文献综述,采用严格的方法提供了一个公正和全面的概述。本研究的目的是:(1)研究对高强度交通工具实施LCA的最先进的方法方法(即定性评估);(2)量化当前ice - hcv和zev的碳足迹(即定量评估)。经过筛选步骤,从几个数据库中提取了24份出版物的样本,其中包括科学文章和工业报告。从数量上看,分析强调了碳足迹结果的显著差异,柴油icev的二氧化碳当量为431-1780吨,电池电动汽车的二氧化碳当量为175-1626吨,燃料电池电动汽车的二氧化碳当量为366-2944吨。相反,从定性的角度来看,综述表明,虽然在功能单位上存在相当的共识,但仍然存在主要的不同的方法选择,导致研究之间的碳足迹显著差异。此外,分析还强调,迫切需要改进原始数据的覆盖范围,并进一步统一LCA方法和假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信