Can targeted cognitive intervention improve rehabilitation outcome in hip fracture patients: a randomized controlled trial

Yedida Borow, Renata Efrati, Noa Doron, Michal Tzin, Yaara Ginsburg, Daniela Gesner, Avital Hershkovitz
{"title":"Can targeted cognitive intervention improve rehabilitation outcome in hip fracture patients: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yedida Borow,&nbsp;Renata Efrati,&nbsp;Noa Doron,&nbsp;Michal Tzin,&nbsp;Yaara Ginsburg,&nbsp;Daniela Gesner,&nbsp;Avital Hershkovitz","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hip fractures lead to disability, loss of independence, and a decline in quality of life. Rehabilitation success depends on various factors, such as, age, pre-fracture function, level of cognitive function, nutritional status, comorbidity, and family support. Most studies exploring the question of whether cognitive-based interventions can lead to functional improvement were conducted on community-dwelling elderly individuals with acquired brain injury, dementia, and cognitive impairments. Our aim was to compare targeted cognitive intervention with conventional occupational therapy in improving rehabilitation outcomes amongst post-acute hip fracture patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A randomized controlled single blinded study. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group A (intervention) received targeted cognitive intervention, based on concepts from \"The multi-context approach to cognitive rehabilitation of executive dysfunction\" and group B (controls) received conventional occupational therapy. T-test and chi-square tests assessed significant differences between demographic, clinical, functional variables. ANOVA with repeated measures assessed significant improvement in cognitive/functional test scores in the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>43 patients were assigned to the intervention group; 37 to the controls. All patients significantly improved in their cognitive tests. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding discharge scores of the cognitive test, degree of cognitive improvement, functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures questions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Targeted cognitive intervention did not lead to a better outcome in hip fracture patients. As most were cognitively impaired, further research is warranted in order to explore whether different cognitive interventions might improve their rehabilitation outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307825000748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hip fractures lead to disability, loss of independence, and a decline in quality of life. Rehabilitation success depends on various factors, such as, age, pre-fracture function, level of cognitive function, nutritional status, comorbidity, and family support. Most studies exploring the question of whether cognitive-based interventions can lead to functional improvement were conducted on community-dwelling elderly individuals with acquired brain injury, dementia, and cognitive impairments. Our aim was to compare targeted cognitive intervention with conventional occupational therapy in improving rehabilitation outcomes amongst post-acute hip fracture patients.

Methods

A randomized controlled single blinded study. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group A (intervention) received targeted cognitive intervention, based on concepts from "The multi-context approach to cognitive rehabilitation of executive dysfunction" and group B (controls) received conventional occupational therapy. T-test and chi-square tests assessed significant differences between demographic, clinical, functional variables. ANOVA with repeated measures assessed significant improvement in cognitive/functional test scores in the two groups.

Results

43 patients were assigned to the intervention group; 37 to the controls. All patients significantly improved in their cognitive tests. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding discharge scores of the cognitive test, degree of cognitive improvement, functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures questions.

Conclusions

Targeted cognitive intervention did not lead to a better outcome in hip fracture patients. As most were cognitively impaired, further research is warranted in order to explore whether different cognitive interventions might improve their rehabilitation outcomes.
有针对性的认知干预能否改善髋部骨折患者的康复结果:一项随机对照试验
背景:髋部骨折会导致残疾、丧失独立性和生活质量下降。康复成功取决于多种因素,如年龄、骨折前功能、认知功能水平、营养状况、合并症和家庭支持。大多数探索基于认知的干预是否能导致功能改善的研究都是针对社区居住的老年获得性脑损伤、痴呆和认知障碍患者进行的。我们的目的是比较有针对性的认知干预与传统的职业治疗在改善急性髋部骨折后患者康复结果方面的效果。方法采用随机对照单盲研究。80例患者随机分为两组:A组(干预组)根据“执行功能障碍认知康复的多情境方法”的概念进行有针对性的认知干预,B组(对照组)接受常规的职业治疗。t检验和卡方检验评估了人口学、临床和功能变量之间的显著差异。重复测量的方差分析评估了两组认知/功能测试分数的显著改善。结果43例患者分为干预组;37号去控制。所有患者的认知测试都有显著改善。在认知测试的出院分数、认知改善程度、功能结果和患者报告的结果测量问题方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。结论有针对性的认知干预并不能改善髋部骨折患者的预后。由于大多数患者有认知障碍,因此需要进一步研究以探索不同的认知干预是否可以改善他们的康复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信