{"title":"From risk to action: how perceived risks and cultural dynamics drive surplus food purchases in China and Spain","authors":"Muni Ni-Ying, Belén Derqui, Jorge Matute","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Surplus food retailing reduces waste and supports food security; however, cultural differences critically shape consumer behaviors. Combining the theory of planned behavior and risk theory, this study compares the drivers and barriers of purchase intentions for surplus food in China (<em>n</em> = 695) and Spain (<em>n</em> = 535) using multi-group analysis combined with necessary condition analysis. The results highlight that Chinese consumers’ intentions rely on perceived behavioral control (enabled by e-commerce and policies), personal norms and attitudes, whereas Spanish intentions hinge on physical, performance, and financial risk perceptions, with no significant behavioral control effects. The findings challenge one-size-fits-all approaches to food waste reduction, proposing an actionable framework in which China prioritizes digital infrastructure and norm-based campaigns, while Spain targets risk-transparent labeling and trust building. This study advances resource-efficient food systems by prioritizing contextual drivers, offering policymakers a roadmap for aligning surplus food strategies with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108533"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Surplus food retailing reduces waste and supports food security; however, cultural differences critically shape consumer behaviors. Combining the theory of planned behavior and risk theory, this study compares the drivers and barriers of purchase intentions for surplus food in China (n = 695) and Spain (n = 535) using multi-group analysis combined with necessary condition analysis. The results highlight that Chinese consumers’ intentions rely on perceived behavioral control (enabled by e-commerce and policies), personal norms and attitudes, whereas Spanish intentions hinge on physical, performance, and financial risk perceptions, with no significant behavioral control effects. The findings challenge one-size-fits-all approaches to food waste reduction, proposing an actionable framework in which China prioritizes digital infrastructure and norm-based campaigns, while Spain targets risk-transparent labeling and trust building. This study advances resource-efficient food systems by prioritizing contextual drivers, offering policymakers a roadmap for aligning surplus food strategies with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.