Prognosis risk stratification in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma after surgery: Development and validation of integrated biomarkers

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
L. Jian , N. Wu , F. Bi , H. Li , M. Zhu , M. Bao , Z. Ai , J. Wang , C. Fang , X. Yu
{"title":"Prognosis risk stratification in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma after surgery: Development and validation of integrated biomarkers","authors":"L. Jian ,&nbsp;N. Wu ,&nbsp;F. Bi ,&nbsp;H. Li ,&nbsp;M. Zhu ,&nbsp;M. Bao ,&nbsp;Z. Ai ,&nbsp;J. Wang ,&nbsp;C. Fang ,&nbsp;X. Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Currently, there is a lack of prognostic assessment tools for cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC). To develop a prognostic tool for patients with CAC after surgery, we innovatively integrated radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, clinicopathologic variables, and DNA methylation data.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively collected the clinical and imaging data of patients with CAC. Pre-, post-, and fusion radiomic models were constructed using a support-vector-machine classifier. Clinical, radiomic features, and DNA methylation data were integrated to develop the combined model. Model performance for the prediction of progression-free survival was evaluated using Harrell' concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups stratified by the models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 127 CAC patients (training cohort, n=86; validation cohort, n=41) were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model based on chemoradiotherapy and invasion depth achieved a C-index of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.784–0.838). The pre-contrast, post-contrast, and fusion radiomic models yielded a C-index of 0.745 (95%CI: 0.688–0.802), 0.723 (95%CI: 0.668–0.778), 0.757 (95%CI: 0.708–0.806), respectively. The combined model based on chemoradiotherapy, ZNF582, and post-contrast radiomic features obtained the highest C-index of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835–0.909). The Kaplan-Meier curves display that the high-risk patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to the low-risk patients (all P&lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined model can be used as a prognosis stratification tool for patients with CAC, which can facilitate disease monitoring and clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025002053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Currently, there is a lack of prognostic assessment tools for cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC). To develop a prognostic tool for patients with CAC after surgery, we innovatively integrated radiomic features from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, clinicopathologic variables, and DNA methylation data.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical and imaging data of patients with CAC. Pre-, post-, and fusion radiomic models were constructed using a support-vector-machine classifier. Clinical, radiomic features, and DNA methylation data were integrated to develop the combined model. Model performance for the prediction of progression-free survival was evaluated using Harrell' concordance index (C-index). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups stratified by the models.

Results

A total of 127 CAC patients (training cohort, n=86; validation cohort, n=41) were included. In the validation cohort, the clinical model based on chemoradiotherapy and invasion depth achieved a C-index of 0.811 (95%CI: 0.784–0.838). The pre-contrast, post-contrast, and fusion radiomic models yielded a C-index of 0.745 (95%CI: 0.688–0.802), 0.723 (95%CI: 0.668–0.778), 0.757 (95%CI: 0.708–0.806), respectively. The combined model based on chemoradiotherapy, ZNF582, and post-contrast radiomic features obtained the highest C-index of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835–0.909). The Kaplan-Meier curves display that the high-risk patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to the low-risk patients (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The combined model can be used as a prognosis stratification tool for patients with CAC, which can facilitate disease monitoring and clinical decision-making.
宫颈腺癌患者术后预后风险分层:综合生物标志物的开发和验证
目前,缺乏对宫颈腺癌(CAC)的预后评估工具。为了开发手术后CAC患者的预后工具,我们创新地整合了对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)图像、临床病理变量和DNA甲基化数据的放射学特征。材料与方法回顾性收集CAC患者的临床及影像学资料。使用支持向量机分类器构建了前、后和融合放射学模型。结合临床、放射学特征和DNA甲基化数据来开发联合模型。采用Harrell' concordance index (C-index)评估模型预测无进展生存期的性能。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于显示模型分层的高危组和低危组之间的生存差异。结果共127例CAC患者(训练队列,n=86;纳入验证队列(n=41)。在验证队列中,基于放化疗和侵袭深度的临床模型的c指数为0.811 (95%CI: 0.784-0.838)。对比前、对比后和融合放射学模型的c指数分别为0.745 (95%CI: 0.688-0.802)、0.723 (95%CI: 0.668-0.778)、0.757 (95%CI: 0.708-0.806)。基于放化疗、ZNF582和造影后放射学特征的联合模型c -指数最高,为0.872 (95%CI: 0.835-0.909)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,高危患者的PFS明显短于低危患者(p < 0.05)。结论联合模型可作为CAC患者的预后分层工具,便于疾病监测和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信