Juliane Mees , Michael Eisenmann , Tamara Pscheidl , Anna Höhn , Sina Ebert , Nina Roth , Vera Rauschenberger , Julia Reusch , Nils Petri , Stefanie Kampmeier , Isabell Wagenhäuser , Manuel Krone
{"title":"Unveiling hidden cases: Hospital screening as a proxy for SARS-CoV-2 incidence in the general population","authors":"Juliane Mees , Michael Eisenmann , Tamara Pscheidl , Anna Höhn , Sina Ebert , Nina Roth , Vera Rauschenberger , Julia Reusch , Nils Petri , Stefanie Kampmeier , Isabell Wagenhäuser , Manuel Krone","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 incidence served as a critical metric for monitoring the epidemiological situation and guiding public health policies. However, as testing requirements and strategies evolved throughout the pandemic, an increasing number of SARS-CoV-2 infections may have remained undetected. This study investigates alternative indicators for estimating unreported SARS-CoV-2 infections.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This study uses a retrospective observational approach, analysing SARS-CoV-2 incidence data from different population groups to determine correlations and identify potential proxy indicators for incidence in the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Monthly SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates from January 03, 2020 to April 30, 2023 in the general Bavarian population were compared with incidence rates among three reference populations at a Bavarian tertiary care hospital: healthcare workers (HCWs), inpatients, and visitors. Correlations and cross-correlations were calculated to assess the potential of these datasets as proxies for estimating general population incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The general population reported incidence was highly correlated with the HCWs (r = 0.84) and the inpatient incidence (r = 0.81), while visitor incidence exhibited a weaker correlation (r = 0.35). Restricting analysis to data up to March 2022 – used as a reference point after which the general population reported incidence consistently fell below the indicator-based incidences – the correlations increased for HCWs (r = 0.92) and inpatients (r = 0.92).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 2022 reversal of incidence data indicates an underreporting of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Screening data from tertiary care hospitals are an important public health strategy for estimating current incidence rates, especially in the post-pandemic period, even when case monitoring is stopped or decompensated. Incidence rates among HCWs and inpatients in low-threshold testing environments are reliable proxies for general population reported incidence, offering valuable insights into SARS-CoV-2 and other acute respiratory viruses in the post-pandemic era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500349X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 incidence served as a critical metric for monitoring the epidemiological situation and guiding public health policies. However, as testing requirements and strategies evolved throughout the pandemic, an increasing number of SARS-CoV-2 infections may have remained undetected. This study investigates alternative indicators for estimating unreported SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Study design
This study uses a retrospective observational approach, analysing SARS-CoV-2 incidence data from different population groups to determine correlations and identify potential proxy indicators for incidence in the general population.
Methods
Monthly SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates from January 03, 2020 to April 30, 2023 in the general Bavarian population were compared with incidence rates among three reference populations at a Bavarian tertiary care hospital: healthcare workers (HCWs), inpatients, and visitors. Correlations and cross-correlations were calculated to assess the potential of these datasets as proxies for estimating general population incidence.
Results
The general population reported incidence was highly correlated with the HCWs (r = 0.84) and the inpatient incidence (r = 0.81), while visitor incidence exhibited a weaker correlation (r = 0.35). Restricting analysis to data up to March 2022 – used as a reference point after which the general population reported incidence consistently fell below the indicator-based incidences – the correlations increased for HCWs (r = 0.92) and inpatients (r = 0.92).
Conclusions
The 2022 reversal of incidence data indicates an underreporting of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Screening data from tertiary care hospitals are an important public health strategy for estimating current incidence rates, especially in the post-pandemic period, even when case monitoring is stopped or decompensated. Incidence rates among HCWs and inpatients in low-threshold testing environments are reliable proxies for general population reported incidence, offering valuable insights into SARS-CoV-2 and other acute respiratory viruses in the post-pandemic era.
期刊介绍:
Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.