Risks and protective factors for cognitive maintenance in men and women: A secondary analysis of the longitudinal SHARE data

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yuliya Bodryzlova , Grégory Moullec
{"title":"Risks and protective factors for cognitive maintenance in men and women: A secondary analysis of the longitudinal SHARE data","authors":"Yuliya Bodryzlova ,&nbsp;Grégory Moullec","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Maintaining good or excellent cognition is important for the autonomy and quality of life of older adults. Cognitive maintenance in later life results from the combined influence of protective and risk factors, yet broader structural contexts – such as gender, socioeconomic status (SES) and welfare regimes – may also play a crucial role. However, no study has comprehensively assessed how individual and structural factors interact to influence cognitive maintenance in older adults. This study evaluates the relative contributions of sociodemographic factors, dementia risks and protective factors, SES and welfare type to cognitive maintenance in older men and women over a four-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of the longitudinal data from waves 5 and 7 (2013–2017) of the Survey on Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cognitive maintenance was operationalized as stable good delayed recall performance over four years. A series of multilevel logistic regression models was constructed, with a country of residence included as a random effect. Analyses were stratified by gender and welfare regime to examine contextual differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Age and SES emerged as the strongest predictors of cognitive maintenance in both genders, with a steeper SES gradient among women. The country of residence was the next most important predictor, while individual risk and protective factors contributed relatively less to the probability of cognitive maintenance. Stratification by welfare type revealed differences in cognitive maintenance prevalence, particularly in corporative and socio-democratic welfare regimes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Population-level interventions aimed at reducing social inequalities, promoting inclusion and addressing gender disparities should be central to cognitive health promotion strategies. Further research is needed to identify the active components of different welfare models that support cognitive maintenance, particularly in so-called corporative and socio-democratic countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625003270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Maintaining good or excellent cognition is important for the autonomy and quality of life of older adults. Cognitive maintenance in later life results from the combined influence of protective and risk factors, yet broader structural contexts – such as gender, socioeconomic status (SES) and welfare regimes – may also play a crucial role. However, no study has comprehensively assessed how individual and structural factors interact to influence cognitive maintenance in older adults. This study evaluates the relative contributions of sociodemographic factors, dementia risks and protective factors, SES and welfare type to cognitive maintenance in older men and women over a four-year follow-up.

Study design

We conducted a secondary analysis of the longitudinal data from waves 5 and 7 (2013–2017) of the Survey on Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).

Methods

Cognitive maintenance was operationalized as stable good delayed recall performance over four years. A series of multilevel logistic regression models was constructed, with a country of residence included as a random effect. Analyses were stratified by gender and welfare regime to examine contextual differences.

Results

Age and SES emerged as the strongest predictors of cognitive maintenance in both genders, with a steeper SES gradient among women. The country of residence was the next most important predictor, while individual risk and protective factors contributed relatively less to the probability of cognitive maintenance. Stratification by welfare type revealed differences in cognitive maintenance prevalence, particularly in corporative and socio-democratic welfare regimes.

Conclusion

Population-level interventions aimed at reducing social inequalities, promoting inclusion and addressing gender disparities should be central to cognitive health promotion strategies. Further research is needed to identify the active components of different welfare models that support cognitive maintenance, particularly in so-called corporative and socio-democratic countries.
男性和女性认知维持的风险和保护因素:对纵向SHARE数据的二次分析
目的保持良好或良好的认知能力对老年人的自理能力和生活质量具有重要意义。晚年的认知维持是保护性因素和风险因素共同影响的结果,但更广泛的结构背景——如性别、社会经济地位(SES)和福利制度——也可能起着至关重要的作用。然而,没有研究全面评估个体因素和结构因素如何相互作用影响老年人的认知维持。本研究对老年男性和女性进行了为期四年的随访,评估了社会人口因素、痴呆风险和保护因素、社会经济地位和福利类型对认知维持的相对贡献。研究设计我们对欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)第5和第7波(2013-2017)的纵向数据进行了二次分析。方法4年多的时间里,认知维持表现为稳定良好的延迟回忆表现。建立了一系列的多水平logistic回归模型,其中包括居住国作为随机效应。分析按性别和福利制度分层,以检查背景差异。结果年龄和社会经济地位是两性认知维持的最强预测因子,其中女性的社会经济地位梯度更大。居住国是第二个最重要的预测因素,而个人风险和保护因素对认知维持的可能性贡献相对较小。福利类型的分层揭示了认知维持率的差异,特别是在法人和社会民主福利制度中。结论旨在减少社会不平等、促进包容和解决性别差异的人群干预措施应成为认知健康促进战略的核心。需要进一步的研究来确定支持认知维持的不同福利模式的积极组成部分,特别是在所谓的公司和社会民主国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信