[Assessment of urinary cotinine levels in heated tobacco product (HTP) users: Effectiveness of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)].

Ying Jiang, Kazuaki Kawai, Yun-Shan Li, Noriaki Kakiuchi, Hiroshi Yamato
{"title":"[Assessment of urinary cotinine levels in heated tobacco product (HTP) users: Effectiveness of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)].","authors":"Ying Jiang, Kazuaki Kawai, Yun-Shan Li, Noriaki Kakiuchi, Hiroshi Yamato","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives Urinary cotinine concentration is widely used as a reliable biomarker to objectively evaluate smoking status. High-precision methods, such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), are mainly used for measuring cotinine concentrations. However, these techniques require expensive equipment and specialized analytical techniques; therefore, they are not suitable for large-scale surveys. Conversely, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which is simple and low-cost and has a precision comparable to that of LC-MS and GC-MS, has attracted attention. ELISA has been shown to be useful for evaluating urinary cotinine levels in combustible cigarette smokers; however, its application to heated tobacco product (HTP) users has not yet been examined. Thus, in this study, we aimed to measure urinary cotinine concentrations in HTP users and ascertain whether ELISA is as effective as LC-MS for such measurements.Methods Urine samples were collected from workers at a certain workplace during lunch breaks on weekdays. In total, 33 participants were analyzed: 11 nonsmokers, 13 cigarette-only smokers, and 9 HTP-only users. Urinary cotinine concentrations were measured using LC-MS and ELISA. The correlation between the measurements obtained using these methods was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient; the agreement was examined using the Bland-Altman analysis.Results The ELISA and LC-MS results showed a high correlation (cigarette-only smokers: r = 0.84, P < 0.001; HTP-only users: r = 0.96, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed a high degree of agreement, with 90.9% of the data between both methods falling within the limits of agreement.Conclusion ELISA was useful for evaluating urinary cotinine levels in cigarette smokers and HTP users. Because of its convenience and low cost, ELISA is expected to be utilized for large-scale epidemiological surveys and promoting smoking control in workplaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Urinary cotinine concentration is widely used as a reliable biomarker to objectively evaluate smoking status. High-precision methods, such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), are mainly used for measuring cotinine concentrations. However, these techniques require expensive equipment and specialized analytical techniques; therefore, they are not suitable for large-scale surveys. Conversely, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which is simple and low-cost and has a precision comparable to that of LC-MS and GC-MS, has attracted attention. ELISA has been shown to be useful for evaluating urinary cotinine levels in combustible cigarette smokers; however, its application to heated tobacco product (HTP) users has not yet been examined. Thus, in this study, we aimed to measure urinary cotinine concentrations in HTP users and ascertain whether ELISA is as effective as LC-MS for such measurements.Methods Urine samples were collected from workers at a certain workplace during lunch breaks on weekdays. In total, 33 participants were analyzed: 11 nonsmokers, 13 cigarette-only smokers, and 9 HTP-only users. Urinary cotinine concentrations were measured using LC-MS and ELISA. The correlation between the measurements obtained using these methods was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient; the agreement was examined using the Bland-Altman analysis.Results The ELISA and LC-MS results showed a high correlation (cigarette-only smokers: r = 0.84, P < 0.001; HTP-only users: r = 0.96, P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed a high degree of agreement, with 90.9% of the data between both methods falling within the limits of agreement.Conclusion ELISA was useful for evaluating urinary cotinine levels in cigarette smokers and HTP users. Because of its convenience and low cost, ELISA is expected to be utilized for large-scale epidemiological surveys and promoting smoking control in workplaces.

[评价加热烟草制品(HTP)使用者尿中可替宁水平:酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的有效性]。
目的尿可替宁浓度被广泛用作客观评价吸烟状况的可靠生物标志物。可替宁浓度的测定主要采用液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS)和气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)等高精度方法。然而,这些技术需要昂贵的设备和专门的分析技术;因此,它们不适合大规模调查。相反,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)因其操作简单、成本低、精度可与LC-MS和GC-MS相媲美而备受关注。ELISA已被证明可用于评估可燃香烟吸烟者尿中可替宁水平;然而,其在加热烟草制品(HTP)使用者中的应用尚未得到检验。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在测量HTP使用者的尿可替宁浓度,并确定ELISA是否与LC-MS一样有效。方法对某工作场所工作人员在工作日午休时间进行尿样采集。总共分析了33名参与者:11名不吸烟者,13名只吸烟的人和9名只使用http的人。采用LC-MS和ELISA检测尿可替宁浓度。使用Pearson相关系数评估这些方法测量值之间的相关性;使用Bland-Altman分析对该协议进行了检验。结果ELISA检测结果与LC-MS检测结果呈高度相关(纯吸烟者:r = 0.84, P < 0.001;纯http用户:r = 0.96, P < 0.001)。Bland-Altman图显示了高度的一致性,两种方法之间90.9%的数据落在一致性的范围内。结论ELISA法可用于评价吸烟者和HTP使用者尿可替宁水平。由于其便捷性和低成本,ELISA有望用于大规模流行病学调查和促进工作场所的吸烟控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信