Progression of Loss of Vision From Centre-Involving Macular Atrophy in Eyes Treated for nAMD.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kelvin Y C Teo, Theodorus Leonardus Ponsioen, Sioe Lan, Louise OToole, Carolina Arruabarrena Sanchez, Richard Barry, Helena Brosa Morros, Charmaine Chung, Alessandro Invernizzi, Gemmy Chui Ming Cheung, Daniel Barthelmes, Mark C Gillies
{"title":"Progression of Loss of Vision From Centre-Involving Macular Atrophy in Eyes Treated for nAMD.","authors":"Kelvin Y C Teo, Theodorus Leonardus Ponsioen, Sioe Lan, Louise OToole, Carolina Arruabarrena Sanchez, Richard Barry, Helena Brosa Morros, Charmaine Chung, Alessandro Invernizzi, Gemmy Chui Ming Cheung, Daniel Barthelmes, Mark C Gillies","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to characterise visual acuity (VA) changes in eyes without baseline macular atrophy (MA) that subsequently developed MA during treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control analysis was performed using data from a multicentre real-world AMD registry. We compared VA outcomes in 1998 treatment-naïve eyes without MA at baseline and ≥ 5 years of follow-up. Two matched groups (999 eyes each) were analysed: eyes that developed incident MA and those that never did.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparisons were made between two matched groups of 999 eyes each with incident MA and those that never developed it with at least 5 years of follow-up. Final VA was best in eyes that never developed MA, followed by eyes that developed extrafoveal and sub-foveal MA (68.9 ± 16.7, 67.0 ± 16.9 and 52.1 ± 23.6 letters, p < 0.01). Eyes with incident MA had more inactive disease visits compared to those that never developed MA. Features associated with poor final VA included the presence of sub-foveal MA (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] -16.63 [-18.7 to 14.56], p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of active visits (per 10%) (OR [95% CI] -0.73 [-1.12 to 0.34], p < 0.01). The mean time to lose five letters of vision from first grading of sub-foveal MA was 17.3 ± 4.6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to achieve disease inactivity in nAMD despite its association with incident MA, as neovascular complications play a significant role in VA loss. The long duration between the incidence of MA and clinically significant loss of vision offers an opportunity for potential interventions against atrophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to characterise visual acuity (VA) changes in eyes without baseline macular atrophy (MA) that subsequently developed MA during treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods: A case-control analysis was performed using data from a multicentre real-world AMD registry. We compared VA outcomes in 1998 treatment-naïve eyes without MA at baseline and ≥ 5 years of follow-up. Two matched groups (999 eyes each) were analysed: eyes that developed incident MA and those that never did.

Results: Comparisons were made between two matched groups of 999 eyes each with incident MA and those that never developed it with at least 5 years of follow-up. Final VA was best in eyes that never developed MA, followed by eyes that developed extrafoveal and sub-foveal MA (68.9 ± 16.7, 67.0 ± 16.9 and 52.1 ± 23.6 letters, p < 0.01). Eyes with incident MA had more inactive disease visits compared to those that never developed MA. Features associated with poor final VA included the presence of sub-foveal MA (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] -16.63 [-18.7 to 14.56], p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of active visits (per 10%) (OR [95% CI] -0.73 [-1.12 to 0.34], p < 0.01). The mean time to lose five letters of vision from first grading of sub-foveal MA was 17.3 ± 4.6 months.

Conclusion: It is important to achieve disease inactivity in nAMD despite its association with incident MA, as neovascular complications play a significant role in VA loss. The long duration between the incidence of MA and clinically significant loss of vision offers an opportunity for potential interventions against atrophy.

在nAMD治疗的眼睛中从中心到黄斑萎缩的视力丧失的进展。
背景:本研究旨在描述无基线黄斑萎缩(MA)的眼睛的视力(VA)变化,这些眼睛随后在治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)期间发展为MA。方法:使用来自多中心真实世界AMD注册表的数据进行病例对照分析。我们比较了1998年treatment-naïve无MA的眼睛在基线和≥5年随访时的VA结果。研究人员对两组相匹配的眼睛(每组999只眼睛)进行了分析:一组发生偶发性MA的眼睛和一组从未发生过MA的眼睛。结果:在至少5年的随访中,对两组相匹配的999只眼睛进行了比较,每组眼睛有偶发MA和从未发生MA。未发生MA的眼睛的最终VA最好,其次是发生中央凹外和中央凹下MA的眼睛(68.9±16.7,67.0±16.9和52.1±23.6个字母)。结论:尽管与MA事件相关,但在nAMD中实现疾病不活动是重要的,因为新生血管并发症在VA损失中起重要作用。从MA发病到临床上明显的视力丧失之间的长时间间隔为潜在的干预萎缩提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信