Assessment of the status of DNA mismatch repair proteins by immunohistochemistry. Proposal for evaluation with two antibodies.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Leonardo Saul Lino-Silva, Ángeles Galán-Ramírez, Sabrina B Martínez-Villavicencio, Luisa Rivera-Moncada, César Zepeda-Najar, Hanna I Ortega-Martínez
{"title":"Assessment of the status of DNA mismatch repair proteins by immunohistochemistry. Proposal for evaluation with two antibodies.","authors":"Leonardo Saul Lino-Silva, Ángeles Galán-Ramírez, Sabrina B Martínez-Villavicencio, Luisa Rivera-Moncada, César Zepeda-Najar, Hanna I Ortega-Martínez","doi":"10.5114/pjp.2025.148390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determining the status of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is crucial for patients because they may respond differently to specific treatments and have a better prognosis. We proposed a panel with only 2 antibodies to determine the status of the MMR proteins, improving costs, workload, and delivery of results. Patients with adenocarcinoma and MMR determination were reclassified using only the evaluation of PMS2 and MSH6. The diagnostic performance of the 2-antibody test (proposed panel) and 4-antibody (traditional panel) test was compared against the polymerase chain reaction study (reference standard). A total of 202 cases were identified. The predominant histological type was adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, the predominant histological grade was 2, and 60.9% of the cases were found in clinical stage II. When comparing the diagnostic performance of the traditional panel of 4 antibodies against a panel of 2 antibodies, no statistically significant differences were found (sensitivity 95.35% vs. 90.7%; specificity 98.74% vs. 98.11%; positive predictive value 95.35% vs. 92.86%; negative predictive value 98.74% vs. 97.50%; area under the curve 0.970 vs. 0.944; p = 0.419).Analysis of MMR status determination with only 2 antibodies demonstrates that it is as effective as using 4 antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49692,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Pathology","volume":"76 1","pages":"54-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2025.148390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the status of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is crucial for patients because they may respond differently to specific treatments and have a better prognosis. We proposed a panel with only 2 antibodies to determine the status of the MMR proteins, improving costs, workload, and delivery of results. Patients with adenocarcinoma and MMR determination were reclassified using only the evaluation of PMS2 and MSH6. The diagnostic performance of the 2-antibody test (proposed panel) and 4-antibody (traditional panel) test was compared against the polymerase chain reaction study (reference standard). A total of 202 cases were identified. The predominant histological type was adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, the predominant histological grade was 2, and 60.9% of the cases were found in clinical stage II. When comparing the diagnostic performance of the traditional panel of 4 antibodies against a panel of 2 antibodies, no statistically significant differences were found (sensitivity 95.35% vs. 90.7%; specificity 98.74% vs. 98.11%; positive predictive value 95.35% vs. 92.86%; negative predictive value 98.74% vs. 97.50%; area under the curve 0.970 vs. 0.944; p = 0.419).Analysis of MMR status determination with only 2 antibodies demonstrates that it is as effective as using 4 antibodies.

免疫组化评价DNA错配修复蛋白的状态。两种抗体评价方案。
确定DNA错配修复(MMR)蛋白的状态对患者至关重要,因为他们可能对特定治疗有不同的反应,并有更好的预后。我们提出了一个只有2种抗体的小组来确定MMR蛋白的状态,从而改善了成本、工作量和结果的传递。仅使用PMS2和MSH6评估对腺癌患者和MMR检测进行重新分类。将2抗体试验(建议组)和4抗体试验(传统组)的诊断性能与聚合酶链反应试验(参考标准)进行比较。共发现202例病例。主要组织学类型为腺癌,无特殊说明,主要组织学分级为2级,60.9%的病例出现在临床II期。当比较传统的4种抗体和2种抗体的诊断性能时,没有发现统计学上的显著差异(敏感性95.35% vs. 90.7%;特异性98.74% vs. 98.11%;阳性预测值95.35% vs. 92.86%;阴性预测值98.74% vs. 97.50%;曲线下面积0.970 vs. 0.944;P = 0.419)。仅用2种抗体检测MMR状态的分析表明,它与使用4种抗体一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Pathology is an official magazine of the Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology. For the last 18 years of its presence on the market it has published more than 360 original papers and scientific reports, often quoted in reviewed foreign magazines. A new extended Scientific Board of the quarterly magazine comprises people with recognised achievements in pathomorphology and biology, including molecular biology and cytogenetics, as well as clinical oncology. Polish scientists who are working abroad and are international authorities have also been invited. Apart from presenting scientific reports, the magazine will also play a didactic and training role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信